Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorZachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-22T08:50:34Z
dc.date.available2017-05-22T08:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21763
dc.description.abstractUnpaid labour, including care labour is mostly performed by women. Economic theories explain differences in allocation of time between women and men in various ways – neoclassical theories point to the rational choice associated with the varying efficiency of women and men both in the labour market and in the household, while heterodox theories point to the influence of norms, social values and traditions, according to which the man is the breadwinner and the woman the caregiver. Unpaid labour is often called home duties or responsibilities, and even though it is very difficult, tiring and demanding, it is not valued and respected. The main objective of this paper is to present the importance of unpaid care work in the economy and propose the reconsideration of economic policies.en_GB
dc.description.abstractPraca nieodpłatna, wraz z pracą opiekuńczą, jest wykonywana w większości przez kobiety. Teoria ekonomii wyjaśnia taką alokację czasu pomiędzy kobiety i mężczyzn w różny sposób – teorie neoklasyczne wskazują na racjonalny wybór związany ze zróżnicowaną efektywnością kobiet i mężczyzn na rynku pracy oraz w ramach gospodarstwa domowego, podczas gdy teorie heterodoksyjne skupiają się na wpływie norm, wartości społecznych i tradycji, zgodnie z którymi mężczyźni są żywicielami rodziny, a kobiety opiekunkami. Nieodpłatna praca jest trudna, męcząca i wymagająca, jednak nie zawsze jest szanowana i odpowiednio wyceniana. Głównym celem artykułu jest wykazanie znaczenia nieodpłatnej pracy opiekuńczej dla gospodarki.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;326
dc.subjectunpaid labouren_GB
dc.subjectcareen_GB
dc.subjectwomenen_GB
dc.subjectinequalityen_GB
dc.subjecteconomic theoryen_GB
dc.subjectpraca nieodpłatnapl_PL
dc.subjectopiekapl_PL
dc.subjectkobietypl_PL
dc.subjectnierównościpl_PL
dc.subjectteoria ekonomiipl_PL
dc.titleGender, unpaid labour and economicsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeRelacje płci, praca nieodpłatna i ekonomiapl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[121]-132
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute of Economics, Finance and Management
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAkerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. (2000), Economics and Identity, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 115, no. 3, p. 715–753.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlbelda R. (1997), Economics and Feminism – Disturbances in the Field, Twayne Publishers, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesBadgett M.V.L., Folbre N. (1999), Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes, “International Labour Review”, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 311–326.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J., Lynch K., Cantillon S., Walsh J. (2009), Equality: From Theory to Action, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.pl_PL
dc.referencesBecker G.S. (1965), A Theory of the Allocation of Time, “The Economic Journal”, vol. 75, p. 493–517.pl_PL
dc.referencesBecker G.S. (1973), A Theory of Marriage: Part I, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 81, no. 4, p. 813–846.pl_PL
dc.referencesBecker G.S. (1974), A Theory of Marriage: Part II, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 82, no. 2, p. 11–26.pl_PL
dc.referencesBecker G.S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeneria L. (1999), The enduring debate over unpaid labour, “International Labour Review”, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 287–309.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarrasco C., Domínguez M. (2011), Family Strategies for Meeting Care and Domestic Work Needs: Evidence from Spain, “Feminist Economics”, 17(4), p. 159–188.pl_PL
dc.referencesCampillo F. (2003), Unpaid Househlod Labour: A Conceptual Approach, [in:] M. Gutierrez, Macroeconomics: Making Gender Matter: Concepts, Policies and Institutional Change in Developing Countries, New York: Zed Books, London, s. 106–121.pl_PL
dc.referencesCentral Statistical Office (2015), Time Use Survey 2013, Warsaw.pl_PL
dc.referencesEsquivel V. (2011), Sixteen Years After Beijing: What Are New Policy Agendas for Time-Use Data Collection?, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 215–238.pl_PL
dc.referencesFilipowicz K., Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz A. (2015), Analysis of time use data – time allocation between women and men in Poland, [in:] E. Okoń-Horodyńska, A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz (eds.), Statistical profiles of women’s and men’s status in the economy, science and society, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, p. 129–144.pl_PL
dc.referencesFloro M. (1995), Women’s Well-Being, Poverty, and Work Intensity, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 1–25.pl_PL
dc.referencesFolbre N. (1991), The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought, “Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society”, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 463–484.pl_PL
dc.referencesFolbre N. (2006), Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy, “Journal of Human Development”, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 183–199.pl_PL
dc.referencesFolbre N. (2009), Greed, Lust and Gender, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFoldvary F.E. (1996), Comparative economic theory, [in:] F.E. Foldvary (ed.) Beyond Neoclassical Economics; Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p. 1–21.pl_PL
dc.referencesGálvez-Muñoz L., Rodríguez-Monroño P., Domínguez-Serrano M. (2011), Work and Time Use by Gender: A New Clustering of European Welfare Systems, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 17, no. 2, October, p. 125–157.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrapard U. (1996), Feminist economics: let me count the ways, [in:] F.E. Foldvary (ed.) Beyond Neoclassical Economics; Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p. 100–114.pl_PL
dc.referencesHimmelweit S. (1995), The Discovery of “Unpaid Work”: The Social Consequences of the Expansion of “Work”, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1–19.pl_PL
dc.referencesHimmelweit S. (2002), Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 49–70.pl_PL
dc.referencesHimmelweit S. (2005), Can We Afford (not)To Care: Prospects and Policy, “New Working Paper Series, Gender Institute” Issue 15, July.pl_PL
dc.referencesHewitson G.J. (2003). Domestic labour and gender identity: are all women careers?, [in:] D.K. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 266–284.pl_PL
dc.referencesHozer-Koćmiel M. (2010), Statystyczna analiza podziału czasu i wartości pracy kobiet, [in:] Wybrane zagadnienia gospodarowania i zarządzania w pracach doktorskich obronionych na Wydziale Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, „Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania”, no. 20, p. 69–84.pl_PL
dc.referencesHumphries J. (1998), Towards a Family-Friendly Economics, “New Political Economy”, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 223–240.pl_PL
dc.referencesJochimsen M.A. (2003), Integrating vulnerability: on the impact of caring on economic theorizing, [in:] D.K. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 231–246.pl_PL
dc.referencesLundberg S., Pollak R.A. (1996), Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 139–158.pl_PL
dc.referencesLynch K., Baker J., Lyons M. (2009), Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.pl_PL
dc.referencesNelson J.A. (1995), Feminism and Economics, “Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 131–148.pl_PL
dc.referencesPicchio A. (1992), Social Reproduction: The Political Economy of the Labour Market, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPujol M. (1995), Into the Margin, [in:] E. Kuiper, J. Sap, S. Feiner, N. Ott, Z. Tzannatos (eds.), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 17–34.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeiz J.E. (2007), Feminist Economics, [in:] W.J. Samuels, J.E. Biddle, J.B. Davis (eds.), A Companion to The History of Economic Thought, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, p. 454–462.pl_PL
dc.referencesSirianni C., Negrey C. (2000), Working Time as Gendered Time, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 59–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesStanding G. (2001), Care work: Overcoming insecurity and neglect, [in:] M. Daly (ed.) Care Work; The quest for security, International Labour Organization, Geneva, p. 15–32.pl_PL
dc.referencesStanding G. (2009), Work after globalization; Building Occupational Citizenship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorld Bank (1995), Advancing Gender Equality: From Concept to Action, World Bank, Washington D.C.pl_PL
dc.referencesZachorowska-Mazurkiewicz A., Mroczek K. (2015), Time Allocation and the Life Cycle of Women and Men in Poland, [in:] S. Moore (ed.) Contemporary Global Perspectives on Gender Economics, IGI Global, Hershey, p. 293–314.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailanna.zachorowska@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.326.08
dc.relation.volume6en_GB
dc.subject.jelB5
dc.subject.jelJ7


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord