Pokaż uproszczony rekord

DPJ Government and Climate Change Policy

dc.contributor.authorSocha, Marcin
dc.contributor.editorŻakowski, Karol
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T08:29:00Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T08:29:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationM. Socha, DPJ Government and Climate Change Policy, [w:] K. Żakowski (ed.), Changing Determinants of Foreign Policy in East Asian Countries, Contemporary Asian Studies Series, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2017, s. 115-129.pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/20403
dc.descriptionThe monograph provides knowledge on the complex nature of both external and internal determinants influencing foreign policies of East Asian countries. Through a range of case studies on Japan, China, Taiwan and North Korea, the authors analyze international relations in East Asia as a mosaic of intertwining processes of globalization and regionalization, interests of global and regional powers, local social and economic conditions, national institutional arrangements, and even personal factors. They argue that sometimes a sudden change of one small element in this mosaic suffices to influence the whole system. Instead of providing a simplified interpretation of the analyzed processes, the monograph tries to illustrate them in their entire complexity.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractIn 2009 election manifesto Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) leaders voiced their decisive support for stronger engagement in international climate negotiations. The promises were realized by an ambitious climate mitigation proposal presented by Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio at COP 15 in Copenhagen. 25% CO2 levels reduction commitment was heavily criticized by Japanese opposition, METI bureaucrats and business circles. Despite strong domestic opposition Prime Minister Hatoyama decided to place climate mitigation among priorities of his foreign policy. Next DPJ administration quickly backtracked from the position of climate leader. The head of the Japanese delegation at COP 16 in Mexico stated that Japan would not be a part of new Kyoto Protocol commitment period. The aim of the article is to identify changing factors in decision–making process that led to quick change in DPJ’s approach to international climate mitigation efforts.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is a result of research conducted as a part of a project financed by the Polish National Science Centre based on decision No. DEC– 2013/11/B/HS5/04005.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofChanging Determinants of Foreign Policy in East Asian Countries;
dc.relation.ispartofContemporary Asian Studies Series;
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectclimate negotiationspl_PL
dc.subjectJapan’s environmental politicspl_PL
dc.subjectPost–Kyoto Protocol negotiationspl_PL
dc.subjectDemocratic Party of Japanpl_PL
dc.subjectJapan’s foreign policypl_PL
dc.subjectDPJ decision making processpl_PL
dc.titleDPJ Government and Climate Change Policypl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Marcin Socha, Łódź 2017, © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017pl_PL
dc.page.number115-129pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodzpl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-376-5
dc.referencesAburaki, K. 2010, “The politics of climate change in Japan,” in Green M, Searight A (eds.), Green Dragons: The Politics of Climate Change in Asia: A Report of the CSIS Asian Regionalism Initiative, CSIS, pp. 1–11.pl_PL
dc.referencesDemocratic Party of Japan 2009, 2009 election Manifesto, viewed February 12, 2016, http://www.dpj.or.jp/english/manifesto/manifesto2009.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesden Elzen, M., Hof, F. & Mendoza, A. 2009, The Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions, Environmental Science and Policy, No. 14, December 2009.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeWit, A. & Iida, T. 2011, The ‘Power Elite’ and Environmental–Energy Policy in Japan, “The Asia–Pacific Journal”, Vol. 9, Issue 4 No. 4, pp. 1–17.pl_PL
dc.referencesFackler, M. 2009, With Bold Stand, Japan Opposition Wins a Landslide, “New York Times”, September 30, 2009, viewed April 10, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/ world/asia/31japan.html.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeldman, S. 2010, Japan’s Motion to Kill Kyoto Protocol a ‘Slap in the Face’, “Reuters online”, December 2, viewed April 20, 2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/12/02/ idUS219608262920101202.pl_PL
dc.referencesJapan Turns Its Back on Kyoto Protocol, Environmental News Service, viewed April 12, 2012, http://www.ens–newswire.com/ens/dec2010/2010–12–01–02.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesMichaelowa, A. 2010, Copenhagen and the Consequences, “Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy” 2010, Vol. 45, pp. 1–15.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan, J. 2009, Reflections from Copenhagen: The Accord and the Way Forward, World Resources Institute, December 2009, viewed April 20, 2013, http://www.wri.org/stories/ 2009/12/reflections–copenhagen–accord–and–way–forward.pl_PL
dc.referencesObama, B. 2008, Barrack Obama’s speech on climate change (October 18), viewed April 20, 2011, http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/climate/info.service/climate. change.20081104.htm.pl_PL
dc.referencesPajon, C. 2010, Japan’s Ambivalent Diplomacy on Climate Change, “IFRI Health and Environment Reports”, No. 5, pp. 1–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeng Er, L. 2009, The Hatoyama administration and Japan’s climate change initiatives, East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore.pl_PL
dc.referencesRogelj, J.; Chen, C. & Nabel, J. 2010, Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord pledges and its global climatic impacts—a snapshot of dissonant ambitions, “Environmental Research Letters”, No. 5, pp. 1–17.pl_PL
dc.referencesSawa, A. 2009, The High Price Paid for Hatoyama Speech, 21st Public Policy Institute, viewed May 24, 2013, http://www.keidanren.or.jp/21ppi/english/pdf/091030.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesShreurs, M. & Tiberghien, Y. 2010, “Climate Leadership, Japanese Style: Embedded Symbolism and Post–2001 Kyoto Protocol Politics,” in Harrison K, McIntosh Sundstrom L, Sundstrom (eds), Global Commons, Domestic Decisions: The Comparative Politics of Climate Change, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, pp. 139–168.pl_PL
dc.referencesShreurs, M & Tiberghien, Y 2007, “High Noon in Japan: Embedded Symbolism and Post– 2001 Kyoto Protocol Politics,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4, MIT Press, pp. 70–91.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNFCCC 2009a, viewed March 15, 2013, http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_ accord/items/5262.php.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNFCCC 2009b, viewed March 15, 2013, http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/items/5257. php.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNFCCC 2009c, viewed March 15, 2013, http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_ accord/items/5264.php.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNFCCC 2009d, viewed March 15, 2013, http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_ accord/application/pdf/chinacphaccord_app2.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNFCCC 2009e, viewed March 15, 2013, http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_ accord/application/pdf/indiacphaccord_app2.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesVidal, J 2010, “Climate aid threat to countries that refuse to back Copenhagen accord,” The Observer, April 11, viewed April 20, 2013, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/ 2010/apr/11/climate–aid–threats–copenhagen–accord.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-376-5.07


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
[115]_129_Socha.pdf
Rozmiar:
137.1KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
1.203KB
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska