Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGemel, Aleksander
dc.contributor.authorIshii, Tadao
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-09T13:52:16Z
dc.date.available2017-01-09T13:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/20333
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to show that the middle level of mental representations in a conceptual spaces framework is consistent with the OOP paradigm. We argue that conceptual spaces framework together with vague prototype theory of categorization appears to be the most suitable solution for modeling the cognitive apparatus of humans, and that the OOP paradigm can be easily and intuitively reconciled with this framework. First, we show that the prototypebased OOP approach is consistent with Gärdenfors’ model in terms of structural coherence. Second, we argue that the product of cloning process in a prototype-based model is in line with the structure of categories in Gärdenfors’ proposal. Finally, in order to make the fuzzy object-oriented model consistent with conceptual space, we demonstrate how to define membership function in a more cognitive manner, i.e. in terms of similarity to prototype.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris;35
dc.subjectConceptual spacespl_PL
dc.subjectObject-oriented frameworkpl_PL
dc.subjectprototype theory of categorizationpl_PL
dc.subjectvaguenesspl_PL
dc.subjectcognitive architecturepl_PL
dc.subjectPrzestrzenie pojęciowepl_PL
dc.subjectprogramowanie zorientowane obiektowopl_PL
dc.subjectprototypowa teoria kategoryzacjipl_PL
dc.subjectnieostrośćpl_PL
dc.subjectarchitektura poznawczapl_PL
dc.titleConceptual Spaces in Object-Oriented Frameworkpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number1-22pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łodzpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationNiigata University of Information & International Studiespl_PL
dc.referencesBerlin Brent, Kay Paul, 1969, Basic color terms, Berkeley: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoombs Clyde Hamilton, 1964, A theory of data, New York: Wiley.pl_PL
dc.referencesDecock Lieven, Douven Igor, 2014, What Is Graded Membership? “Noûs”, 48, pp. 653–682.pl_PL
dc.referencesDouven Igor, Decock Lieven, Dietz Richard, É gré Paul, 2013, Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach, “Journal of Philosophical Logic” 42(1), pp. 137–160.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans Vyvyan, A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGärdenfors Peter, 2000, Conceptual spaces, Cambridge: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGärdenfors Peter, 2014, Geometry of meaning – Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGärdenfors Peter, 2015, Cognitive science: from computers to ant hills as models of human thought [in:] Gemel A., Łukowski P., Żukowski B., (ed.), Cognition, Meaning and Action. Lodz-Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Lodz-Cracow: Lodz – Jagiellonian University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHampton A. James, 2007, Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness, “Cognitive Science” 31(3), pp. 355-384.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarin Nicolas, Pons Olga, Vila A. Maria, 2000, Fuzzy Types: A New Concept of Type for Managing Vague Structures, “International Journal of Intelligent Systems”, Vol. 15, pp. 1061-1085.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarin Nicolas, Pons Olga, Vila A. Maria, 2001, A Strategy for Adding Fuzzy Types to an Object-Oriented Database System, International Journal Of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 16, pp. 863- 880.pl_PL
dc.referencesMather George, 2001, Object-oriented models of cognitive processing, “Trends in Cognitive Sciences”, 5(5), pp. 182-184.pl_PL
dc.referencesMayhew John, Frisby John, 1984, Computer vision, [in:] O’Shea T., Eisenstadt M., (eds.) Artificial Intelligence: Tools, Techniques, and Applications, New York: Harper & Row pp. 301–357.pl_PL
dc.referencesMervis Catlin, Rosch Eleanor, 1981, Categorization of natural objects, „Annual Review of Psychology” 32, pp. 89-115.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff George, 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesOsherson N. Daniel, Smith, E. Edward, 1981, On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts, “Cognition” 29, pp. 259–288.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosch, Eleanor, 1975, Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories, w: „Journal of Experimental Psychology”, 104, pp. 192-233.pl_PL
dc.referencesShepard N. Roger, 1962, The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part l, „Psychometrika” 27, pp. 125-140.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheetz, Steven, Tegarden David, 2001, Illustrating the cognitive consequences of object-oriented systems development, “The Journal of Systems and Software”, 59, pp. 163-179.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaivalsaari Antero, 1997, Classes vs. Prototypes: Some Philosophical and Historical Observations, “Journal of Object-Oriented Programming” 10(7), pp. 44-50.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume4pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord