Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKomusińska, Jagoda
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T09:28:41Z
dc.date.available2016-01-19T09:28:41Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/16654
dc.description.abstractThe article is built around the analysis of The critique of instrumental reason by Horkheimer, applied to issues connected with the philosophy of economics. Positive economics is under-stood as an example of a discipline where the pragmatic paradigm has been implemented. Therefore, economics functions within the boundaries of what Horkheimer called instrumental rationality. The starting point is the intellectual source shared by economics and the Frankfurt School, namely Kant’s philosophy of rationality. In the first part of the article, three of Kant’s ideas that are fundamental to economics are presented, and then the development of their application in philosophy of science, as seen by Horkheimer in 1947, is laid out. The second part of the article consists of enumerating various distinctive features of economics that set it apart from other social sciences and which constitute factors for which it can be considered a realm of the reign of ‘instrumental rationality’, with all the threats such an approach provokes. The above-mentioned features concentrate on treating humans in economics as a means, not as a goal. This aspect of the philosophy of science of the Frankfurt School (unlike its critique of capitalism as an economic system) has not been widely received.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherLodz University Press
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym;4
dc.subjectFrankfurt School of Philosophypl_PL
dc.subjecteconomicspl_PL
dc.subjectHorkheimerpl_PL
dc.titleEconomics as a Discipline of Instrumental Reason. Looking at Economics as a Science from the Perspective of the Frankfurt School of Philosophypl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number73–83pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCracow University of Economicspl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesDzionek-Kozłowska J., Ekonomia jako nauka pozytywna. Refleksje na marginesie “Ekonomii dobra i zła” Tomasa Sedlacka, “Annales, Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym” 2013, No. 16, pp. 335–344.pl_PL
dc.referencesDzionek-Kozłowska J., R. Matera, Ethics in Economic Thought. Selected Issues and Various Perspectives, Lodz University Press & Jagiellonian University Press, Lodz-Cracow 2015, pp. 81–89.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorkheimer M., Krytyka instrumentalnego rozumu, Scholar, Warsaw 2007.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorkheimer M., T. Adorno, Dialektyka Oświecenia. Fragmenty filozoficzne, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warsaw 1994.pl_PL
dc.referencesKeynes J.M., Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren [in:] Essays in Persuasion, Macmillan, London 1931, pp. 358–374.pl_PL
dc.referencesKorsgaard C., The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology, Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford 2009, pp. 25–99.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuderowicz Z., Czy Kant wierzył w postęp? [in:] Kant wobec problemów współczesnego świata, eds. J. Miklaszewska, P. Spryszak, Jagiellonian University Press, Cracow 2006, pp. 13–17.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcLuhan M., Zrozumieć media: przedłużenia człowieka, Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warsaw 2004.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiklaszewska J., Kantowska utopia racjonalności [in:] Kant wobec problemów współczesnego świata, eds. J. Miklaszewska, P. Spryszak, Jagiellonian University Press, Cracow 2006, pp. 75–86.pl_PL
dc.referencesStewart H., A Critique of Instrumental Reason in Economics, “Economics and Philosophy” 1995, Vol. 11, pp. 57–83.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailj.komusinska@interia.plpl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.18.4.05
dc.relation.volume18pl_PL
dc.subject.jelB40
dc.subject.jelB41


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord