dc.contributor.author | Sierociuk, Jerzy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-30T13:31:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-11-30T13:31:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6077 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14646 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article deals with three problems:
Firstly, it discusses the interpretation of the word-formation “stem“
(here the author tries to define what the stem is: whether it is the whole
periphrase, the word-torn or the lexeme if it is the lexeme - what primary
function has it got as a part of speech).
Secondly, interpretations of the derivative are reviewed. Most often the
derivative is interpreted as a lexeme there is also the problem of its primary
function as a category.
Thirdly, the article deals with the problem o£ assigning meaning to formatives. The author, contrary to A. Bogusławski, speaks in favour of assigning
meaning both to formiatives and to other elements of the texts which have
no loose connection with other segments of the texts. | pl_PL |
dc.description.sponsorship | Zadanie pt. Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki nr 885/P-DUN/2014 zostało dofinansowane ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica;2 | |
dc.title | Historia i zasięg form typu doń, weń w języku polskim | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | The development and distribution, of doń and weń forms in the Polish language | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [165]-173 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Warszawski | pl_PL |