dc.description.abstract | Text scrutinises the political writings of early XX century Polish Marxist, Kazimierz Kelles-
Krauz in the light of contemporary theories of the political. In specific peripheral
conditions and due to entanglement of different struggles in the Polish Kingdom under
tsarist rule there was no longer possible to refer to any firm political ground: organic unity
of nation, necessary class antagonism or laws of history. Therefore, Kelles-Krauz had to
face a somehow similar situation to this conceptualised by contemporary theories of
hegemonic articulation, and radical democracy, as in Laclau, Mouffe or Rancière.
A realistic, “agonistic” conception of democracy emerges, seen as a constant move
without end, necessary assumption and eternally unfulfilled demand, taken as rivalry for
temporarily occupying necessarily empty space, or agonism canalising regressive drives in
political way and mediating between particularisms. In a constant move of change
Marxism is only one step, right and somehow necessary, but in any case the last; it
certainly do not bring any closure of fully realised society. Although still in a crust of older
structures of thinking and above all philosophical language, we can see in Kelles-Krauz
merging of a new paradigm of political thinking, or kind of disclosure of ultimate brake or
gap in political and social order. Therefore we can look also for the depictions of radical,
necessary contingency present in constituting of society, so to say, moments of the
political. | pl_PL |