dc.contributor.author | Dylus, Aniela | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-22T14:03:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-22T14:03:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1899-2226 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/1379 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the context of globalization processes, the social market economy (SME) is in the crisis. Reflection on the features of that model is
closely related with the scientific dispute over its designation. It could be perceived as a theory, political program, sort of economic order,
structure, model or system of economic and social development. Sometimes it is seemed as an idealistic vision or even political utopia
(Niklas Luhmann). Others (eg. Peter Koslowski) argue that this system has come to an end. In favor of this thesis they refer to various
arguments: lack of consensus on redistribution, demographic crisis, depletion of solidarity resources, intergenerational imbalance that
threatens the retirement systems and many others. Despite the range of these arguments, it appears that the SME still has a specific potential
that could be freed. Combating difficulties associated with globalization processes such as: dominance of the economy over politics, ‘tax
starvation’ of the welfare state, marginalization of trade unions, dispersion of ownership and its detachment from responsibility,
‘financialization’ of economy, dominance of ‘casino capitalism’, could help to heal SME. The crisis on financial markets might be
paradoxically an opportunity to return to the ethical foundations of the SME. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Salezjańska Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Zarządzania | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym;Nr 1 | |
dc.subject | crisis | pl_PL |
dc.subject | social market economy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | globalization | pl_PL |
dc.title | Kryzys społecznej gospodarki rynkowej w kontekście procesów globalizacji | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | The Crisis of Social Market Economy in the Context of Globalization Processes | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.references | Albert M., Kapitalizm kontra kapitalizm, Wyd. Signum, Kraków 1994. | |
dc.references | Bergsdorf W., Über den abnehmenden Utopiebedarf des Postmoderne, „Die Neue Ordnung”
2010, H. 1. | |
dc.references | Dardziński P., Społeczna gospodarka rynkowa [w:] Słownik społeczny, red. B. Szlachta, Wyd.
WAM, Kraków 2004. | |
dc.references | Dembiński P., Finanse – pomoc czy zdrada?, mps 2008. | |
dc.references | Kern B., Koloß auf tönernen Füßen, „Concilium“ 1997, nr 2. | |
dc.references | Koslowski P., Das Ende der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, „Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”
11.11.2006, nr 263. | |
dc.references | Luhmann N., Über Kapitalismus und Utopie, „Merkur“ 1994, nr 3. | |
dc.references | Sadowski A., Upadek fałszywych bogów, „Rzeczpospolita” (dodatek: „Lista 2000. Polskie
przedsiębiorstwa”) 31.10–2.11.2008. | |
dc.references | Schlecht O., Soziale Marktwirtschaft [w:] Lexikon der Christlichen Demokratie, red.
W. Becker, G. Buchstab, A. Doering-Manteuffel, R. Morsey, Wyd. Ferdinand
Schöning, Paderborn – München – Wien – Zürich 2002. | |
dc.references | Vahlens Großes Wirtschafts Lexikon, red. E. Dichtl, O. Issing, t. 2, Wyd. C.H. Beck, F. Vahlen,
München 1987. | |
dc.references | Was ist und was kann Ordnungsökonomik?, „Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung“ 19.06.2009, nr
139. | |
dc.relation.volume | 14 | |