Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDylus, Aniela
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-22T14:03:12Z
dc.date.available2013-03-22T14:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/1379
dc.description.abstractIn the context of globalization processes, the social market economy (SME) is in the crisis. Reflection on the features of that model is closely related with the scientific dispute over its designation. It could be perceived as a theory, political program, sort of economic order, structure, model or system of economic and social development. Sometimes it is seemed as an idealistic vision or even political utopia (Niklas Luhmann). Others (eg. Peter Koslowski) argue that this system has come to an end. In favor of this thesis they refer to various arguments: lack of consensus on redistribution, demographic crisis, depletion of solidarity resources, intergenerational imbalance that threatens the retirement systems and many others. Despite the range of these arguments, it appears that the SME still has a specific potential that could be freed. Combating difficulties associated with globalization processes such as: dominance of the economy over politics, ‘tax starvation’ of the welfare state, marginalization of trade unions, dispersion of ownership and its detachment from responsibility, ‘financialization’ of economy, dominance of ‘casino capitalism’, could help to heal SME. The crisis on financial markets might be paradoxically an opportunity to return to the ethical foundations of the SME.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherSalezjańska Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Zarządzaniapl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym;Nr 1
dc.subjectcrisispl_PL
dc.subjectsocial market economypl_PL
dc.subjectglobalizationpl_PL
dc.titleKryzys społecznej gospodarki rynkowej w kontekście procesów globalizacjipl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe Crisis of Social Market Economy in the Context of Globalization Processespl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.referencesAlbert M., Kapitalizm kontra kapitalizm, Wyd. Signum, Kraków 1994.
dc.referencesBergsdorf W., Über den abnehmenden Utopiebedarf des Postmoderne, „Die Neue Ordnung” 2010, H. 1.
dc.referencesDardziński P., Społeczna gospodarka rynkowa [w:] Słownik społeczny, red. B. Szlachta, Wyd. WAM, Kraków 2004.
dc.referencesDembiński P., Finanse – pomoc czy zdrada?, mps 2008.
dc.referencesKern B., Koloß auf tönernen Füßen, „Concilium“ 1997, nr 2.
dc.referencesKoslowski P., Das Ende der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, „Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” 11.11.2006, nr 263.
dc.referencesLuhmann N., Über Kapitalismus und Utopie, „Merkur“ 1994, nr 3.
dc.referencesSadowski A., Upadek fałszywych bogów, „Rzeczpospolita” (dodatek: „Lista 2000. Polskie przedsiębiorstwa”) 31.10–2.11.2008.
dc.referencesSchlecht O., Soziale Marktwirtschaft [w:] Lexikon der Christlichen Demokratie, red. W. Becker, G. Buchstab, A. Doering-Manteuffel, R. Morsey, Wyd. Ferdinand Schöning, Paderborn – München – Wien – Zürich 2002.
dc.referencesVahlens Großes Wirtschafts Lexikon, red. E. Dichtl, O. Issing, t. 2, Wyd. C.H. Beck, F. Vahlen, München 1987.
dc.referencesWas ist und was kann Ordnungsökonomik?, „Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung“ 19.06.2009, nr 139.
dc.relation.volume14


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record