| dc.contributor.author | Wasiński, Marek Jan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-30T13:50:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-30T13:50:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | M. Wasiński, The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute. Tiny Islets and Immense Legal Problems, [w:] The Quandaries and Foreign Development, ed. D. Mierzejewski, “Contemporary Asian Studies Series”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2014, s. 204–215. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-7969-385-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11269 | |
| dc.description | Rozdział z: The Quandaries and Foreign Development, ed. D. Mierzejewski, “Contemporary Asian Studies Series” | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Contemporary Asian Studies Series; | |
| dc.title | The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute. Tiny Islets and Immense Legal Problems | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | [204]–215 | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Łódź | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Agreement concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands, Washington, 17 June 1971, “United Nations Treaty Series”, Vol. 841. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Arbitral Award on the Subject of the Difference Relative to the Sovereignty over Clipperton Island (France v. Mexico), Decision of 28 January 1931, “American Journal of International Law”, Vol. 26, No. 2. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Blum Y. Z. (1965), Historic Titles in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff, Hague 1965. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Brownlie I. (1998), Principles of Public International Law, Oxford 1998. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cheng T. (1974), The Sino-Japanese Dispute Over the Tiao-yu-tai (Senkaku) Islands and the Law of Territorial Acquisition, “Virginia Journal of International Law”, Vol. 14. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Chiu H. (1996–1997), An Analysis of the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the T’iaoyutai Islets (SenkakuGunto), “Chinese Yearbook of International Law”, Vol. 15. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Detter I. (1966), The Problem of Unequal Treaties, “International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, Vol. 15, No. 4. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hagström L. (2012), ‘Power Shift’ in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Incident in 2010, “The Chinese Journal of International Politics”, Vol. 5. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | ICJ, Continental Shelf (Tunisia v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Judgment of 24 February 1982, “ICJ Reports”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | ICJ, Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada v. United States of America), Judgment of 12 October 1984, “ICJ Reports”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | ICJ, Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v. Mali), Judgment of 22 December 1986, “ICJ Reports”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | ICJ, Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway), Judgment of 14 June 1993, “ICJ Reports”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Inoguchi T. (2013), Introduction to Special Issue: Japan–China Fragile Partnership: At Fortieth Anniversary of Diplomatic Normalization, “Japanese Journal of Political Science”, Vol. 14, No. 1. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | International Court of Justice (ICJ), Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. Malta), Judgment of 3 June 1985, “ICJ Reports”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kaikobad K. H. (1983), Some Observation on the Doctrine of Continuity and Finality of Boundaries, “British Yearbook of International Law”, Vol. 54, No. 1. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Karl D. E. (1977), Islands and the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf: A Framework for Analysis, “American Journal of International Law”, Vol. 71, No. 4. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kozłowski A. (2010), The Legal Construct of Historic Title to Territory in International Law – An Overview, “Polish Yearbook of International Law”, Vol. XXX. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Lohmeyer M. (2008), The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Dispute Questions of Sovereignty and Suggestions for Resolving the Dispute, Canterbury 2008. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Manyin M. E. (2013), Senkaku (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Islands Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations, Congressional Research Service, 7–5700, R42761. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Masuo C. T. (2013), Governing a Troubled Relationship: Can the Field of Fisheries Breed Sino-Japanese Cooperation?, “Japanese Journal of Political Science”, Vol. 14, No. 1. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Pan Z. (2007), Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective, “Journal of Chinese Political Science”, Vol. 12. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | People’s Daily Online, 11 September 2012, Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China of 10 September 2012. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Permanent Court of Arbitration, Island of Palmas Case (Netherlands v. USA), Award of 4 April 1928, “Reports of International Arbitral Awards”, Vol. II. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Permanent Court of International Justice, Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway), Merits, Judgment of 5 April 1933, “PCIJ Series AB”. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Suganuma U. (2000), Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relation, University of Hawaii Press 2000. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Taiwan Documents Project, Treaty of Peace between the Republic of China and Japan, Taipei, 28 April 1952. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Taiwan Documents Project, Treaty of Peace with Japan, San Francisco, 8 September 1951. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Taiwan Documents Project, Treaty of Peace, Shimonoseki, 17 April 1895. URL: http://www.taiwan documents.org. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Montego Bay, 10 December 1982, “United Nations Treaty Series”, Vol. 1833. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Wei Su S. (2004), The Tiaoyu Islands and Their Possible Effect on the Maritime Boundary Delimitation between China and Japan, “The Chinese Journal of International Law”, Vol. 3. | pl_PL |
