| dc.contributor.author | Ganguly Swati | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-10T15:15:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-10T15:15:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-12-28 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2083-8530 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/9456 | |
| dc.publisher | Lodz University Press | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance;9 | en |
| dc.rights | This content is open access. | en |
| dc.title | The Turn of the Shrew: Gendering the Power of Loquacity in Othello | en |
| dc.page.number | 1-13 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Reader in English at the Department of English & Other Modern European Languages, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, India | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2300-7605 | |
| dc.references | Aughterson, K., ed. Renaissance Woman: Construction of Femininity in England, ASourcebook. London and New York: Routledge, 1995. | en |
| dc.references | Bakhtin, M. Rabelais and his World. Tr. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984. | en |
| dc.references | Boose, L. “Scolding Brides and Bridling Scoldes: Taming the Woman’s Unruly Member”. Materialist Shakespeare: A History. Ed. I. Kamps. London: Verso, 1995. 239-279. | en |
| dc.references | Braidotti, R.,( Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in ContemporaryFeminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press. 1994) | en |
| dc.references | Erasmus, D. “Lingua” (1525). Tr. E. Fantham. The Collected Works of Erasmus. Eds. E. Fantham and E. Rummel. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1989. | en |
| dc.references | Grennan E. “The Women’s Voices in Othello: Speech, Song, Silence.” ShakespeareQuarterly, Vol. 40, No.3 (1987): 275-292. | en |
| dc.references | Mazzio, C. “Sins of the Tongue”. The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in EarlyModern Europe. Eds. D Hillman and C. Mazzio. London: Routledge, 1997. 53-79. | en |
| dc.references | Neely, C. T. “Constructing the Subject: Feminist Practice and the New Renaissance Discourses.” English Literary Renaissance 18 (1988): 5-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6757.1988.tb00943.x | en |
| dc.references | Parker, P. “Literary Fat Ladies and the Generation of the Text”. Feminism and RenaissanceStudies. Ed. L. Hutson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 249-285. | en |
| dc.references | Parker, P. “Shakespeare and Rhetoric: “dilation” and “delation” in Othello”. Shakespeare andthe Question of Theory. Eds. P. Parker and G. Hartman. New York and London, Methuen, 1985. 54-74. | en |
| dc.references | Stallybrass, P. “Patriarchal Territories: The Body Enclosed”. Rewriting the Renaissance: TheDiscourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe. Eds. M. Ferguson, M. Quilligan et al. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1986. 123-146. | en |
| dc.references | Sinfield, A. “Cultural Materialism, Othello and the Politics of Plausibility”. Literary Theory:An Anthology. Eds. J. Rivkin and M. Ryan. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 804-826. | en |
| dc.references | Russo, M. The Female Grotesque: Risk, Excess and Modernity, New York and London: Routledge, 1995. | en |
| dc.references | Underdown, D.E. “Taming of the Scold: the Enforcement of Patriarchal Authority in Early Modern England”. Order and Disorder in Early Modern England. Eds. A. Fletcher and J. Stevenson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 116-136. | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/v10224-011-0011-8 | en |
