Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMichalski, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-02T13:04:35Z
dc.date.available2012-06-02T13:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/668
dc.description.abstractAfter the introduction of the 1999's pension reform disadvantages of the system are starting to be visable. Important element in this process played a financial crisis that tightened the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of elements of the reformed system. There is growing interest in the problems of operation and possible adjustments of the structure known as „the Polish pension system.” Four main plane of the growing interest can be defined as follows: 1. Course preparation of the reform of 1999. 2. The problem of demographic decline – a reference to the changes of one of the basic pa rameters of what is called, statutory retirement age. 3. The second pillar (capital – mandatory), ie pension funds (public funds, private manage ment, low efficiency) – transparency, improving efficiency. 4. The first pillar (PAYG), ie, Social Security (ZUS) – the need to improve the efficiency of the accounts.pl_PL
dc.language.isootherpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica;
dc.subjectsystem emerytalnypl_PL
dc.subjectOtwarte Fundusze Emerytalne (OFE)pl_PL
dc.subjectPowszechne Towarzystwa Emerytalne (PTE)pl_PL
dc.subjectFundusz Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (FUZ)pl_PL
dc.subjectZakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (ZUS)pl_PL
dc.subjectreforma reformy emerytalnejpl_PL
dc.title"Polski system emerytalny" – co to za konstrukcja, gdzie i co poprawiać?pl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number5-35
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSzkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie; Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów; Instytut Bankowości i Ubezpieczeń Gospodarczych


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record