Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorHorodecka, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-05T11:46:38Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T11:46:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/6022
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of this paper is to exhibit the role of the concept of human nature for the ethical orientation of organizational life. Therefore, after presenting some definitions of the concepts of human nature, which depict the complexity of these phenomena, some models of the concepts of human nature are described. Furthermore, the setting of the concepts of human nature in the organizational life is discussed. Those concepts can be perceived as a deep-structure of the organizational life, having an impact not only on the individual behaviour of employees and managers (like sensibility for human emotions, pro-social engagement, communication style), but also affecting their moral competence and influencing whole organizational culture – image of the organization, preferred management strategies and the way of perceiving justice. Those elements play crucial role in ethical attitude of the organization because all those variables support the efficacy of ethical rules and most of them are part of ethical code and corporate ethical code. Therefore, it is necessary for an organization to consider implicit and explicit concepts of human nature on which the organizational culture is based and support those concepts, which enables the ethical conduct of the organization and being alert especially to the consequences of materialistic/egoistic and competitive concepts of human nature. The theses discussed in the paper are supported by some empirical research studies conducted in this field.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Science Centre (UMO-2011/03/D/HS4/00849)pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherLodz University Presspl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym;4
dc.subjectorganizational cultureen
dc.subjectconcepts of human natureen
dc.subjectbusiness ethicsen
dc.titleThe Meaning of Concepts of Human Nature in Organizational Life in Business Ethics Contexten
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number53-64pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWarsaw School of Economicspl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesAdorno T., E. Frenkiel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, N. Sanford, The Authoritarian Personality, Harper, New York 1950.pl_PL
dc.referencesDawkins R., Samolubny gen [The Selfish Gene], translated by M. Skoneczny, Prószyński i S-ka, Warsaw 1996.pl_PL
dc.referencesDuckitt J., A Dual-process Cognitive-motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice [in:] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, eds. M.P. Zanna, Academic Press, San Diego 2001, pp. 41-113.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J. , Die Funktion von Menschenbildern – Forschungsaufgaben der empirischen Psychologie [in:] Die Menschenbilder in der Psychotherapie. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven und die Modelle der Therapieschulen, ed. H.G. Petzold, Krammer Verlag, Wien 2010, pp. 91-131.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J., Annahmen über den Menschen, Asanger, Heidelberg 2004.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J., M. Cheetham, Assumptions about Human Nature and the Impact of Philosophical Concepts on Professional Issues: A Questionnaire-Based Study with 800 Students from Psychology, Philosophy, and Science, “Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology” 2007, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 183-201.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J., M. Cheetham, The Mind-body Problem as Seen by Students of Different Disciplines, “Journal of Consciousness Studies” 2000, vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 47-59.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J., Menschenbilder [in:] Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie, ed. M.A. Wirtz, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern 2014.pl_PL
dc.referencesFahrenberg J., Plädoyer für eine interdisziplinäre Anthropologie auf empirischer Basis [in:] Wissenschaft und Therapeutik des Unbewussten. Band 2. Konversation und Resonanz in der Psychotherapie, eds. G. Gödde, M.B. Buchholz, PsychosozialVerlag, Gießen 2012, pp. 249-278.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorodecka A., D. Turek, A. Wojtczuk-Turek, Relationship between Organizational Justice, Organi-zational Procedures and Counterproductive Work Behavior and Job Satisfaction. The Case of New Zealand and Poland, DePaul University, Chicago 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorodecka A., Funkcje obrazu człowieka w ekonomii [in:] Pomiędzy polityką stabilizacyjną i polityką rozwoju, ed. J. Stacewicz, Szkoła Główna Handlowa, Warsaw 2012, pp. 9-39.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorodecka A., K. Martowska, E. Wrocławska-Warchała, Concepts of Human Nature, Social Effectiveness and Communication in the Workplace, “Journal of Business Leadership” 2014, No. 1, pp. 133-153.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorodecka A., K. Martowska, Humanistic Vision of Man: Hope for Success, Emotional Intelligence and Pro-Social Engaement, “International Journal of Arts and Sciences” 2014, No. 2, pp. 151-166.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorodecka A., Rola obrazów człowieka w koncepcjach zarządzania z uwzględnieniem aspektów metodologicznych, “Studia Ekonomiczne” (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach) 2012, No. 118, pp. 443-464.pl_PL
dc.referencesKahneman D., Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant I., Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, Meiner, Hamburg 2003.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant I., Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by T.K. Abbott, edited by L. Denis, Broadview Press, Peterborough, Ont. 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesŁukaszewski W., Prywatne koncepcje natury ludzkiej i ich funkcje regulacyjne [in:] Psychologia poznawcza w Polsce, eds. E. Nęcka, A. Tokarz, IP PAN, Warsaw 1997, pp. 69-83.pl_PL
dc.referencesMandler G., Human Nature Explored, Oxford University Press, New York 1997.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGregor D., Theory X and Theory Y, “Workforce” 2002, vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 32-35.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcMahon J.T., J.M. Ivancevich, A Study of Control in a Manufac-turing Organization: Managers and Non-managers, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1976, vol. 21, pp. 66-83.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinoura Y., A Plea for a Hypothesis-Generating Approach to Link the Individual’s World of Meaning and Society’s Cultural Orientation: A Commentary on Oerter et al., “Culture & Psychology” 1996, vol. 2, pp. 53-61. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9621003.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan G., Images of Organization, SAGE Publications, London 1986.pl_PL
dc.referencesOerter R., R. Oerter, H. Agostiani, H.-O. Kim, S. Wibowo, The Concept of Human Nature in East Asia: Etic and Emic Characteristics, “Culture & Psychology” 1996, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 9-51. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9621002.pl_PL
dc.referencesOuchi W.G., Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, “Business Horizons” 1981, No. 6, pp. 82-83, doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(81)90031-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesPhalet K., E. Poppe, Competence and Morality Dimensions of National and Ethnic Stereotypes: A Study in Six Eastern European Countries, “European Journal of Social Psychology” 1997, vol. 27, pp. 703-723.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker S., Tabula rasa. Spory o naturę ludzką [The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature], GWP, Gdańsk 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesRadkiewicz P. , K. Skarzynska, K. Hamer, The Influence of the Big Two. The Perception of People in Relation to Negativistic Beliefs about the Social World, “Social Psychology” 2013, No. 2, pp. 75-83.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchein E., Organizational Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1970.pl_PL
dc.referencesScheler M., Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos, Bouvier, Bonn 1991.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchwartz M.S., Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2004, vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 323-343. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004- 2169-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchwartz M.S., The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2001, No. 3, pp. 247-262.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchwartz M.S., Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2005, vol. 59, No. 1-2, pp. 27-44. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-3403-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkarżyńska K., Człowiek a polityka. Zarys psychologii politycznej, Scholar, Warsaw 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkarżyńska K., P. Radkiewicz, Co wzmacnia/osłabia społeczny darwinizm? O roli do- świadczeń z ludźmi, osobowości, wartości osobistych i przywiązania do wspólnoty, „Psychologia Społeczna” 2011, No 1, pp. 7-23.pl_PL
dc.referencesSullivan J.J., Human Nature, Organizations, and Management Theory, “The Academy of Management Review” 1986, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 534-549. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1986 .4306210.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomer J.F., Beyond the Machine Model of the Firm, toward a Holistic Human Model, “Journal of Socio-Economics” 1998, No. 3, pp. 323-340.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomer J.F., Economic Man vs. Heterodox Men: the Concepts of Human Nature in Schools of Economic Thought, “Journal of Socio-Economics” 2001, vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 281- 293.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurek D., “Koncepcje człowieka” a modele pracownika. Inspiracje dla ZZL, “Edukacja Ekonomistów i Menedżerów” 2010, No. 16, pp. 11-25.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurek D., A. Wojtczuk-Turek, „Koncepcje natury ludzkiej” a kompetencja moralna – analiza zależności, „Edukacja Ekonomistów i Menedżerów” 2011, vol. 21, pp. 83-102.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurek D., Czy postawy etyczne sa dobrymi predyktorami nieetycznych zachowań pracowników?, „Zarzadzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi” 2011, No. 1, pp. 84-96.pl_PL
dc.referencesWojciszke B., W. Baryła, J. Różycka, Wiara w życie jako grę o sumie zerowej [in:] Miedzy przeszłością a przyszłością. Szkice z psychologii politycznej, eds. U. Jakubowska, K. Skarżyńska, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw 2009, pp. 179-188.pl_PL
dc.referencesZupancic M., M. Svetina, Relations between Moral Judgement and the Concept of HumanNature – a Study of Slovenian Young Adults, “Studia Psychologica” 1993, vol. 35, No. 4-5, pp. 425-430.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailahorod@sgh.waw.plpl_PL
dc.relation.volume17


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord