Show simple item record

Ethical Processes and Dilemmas during Research with Youth on Cyber-Risk

dc.contributor.authorCavanagh, Jay
dc.contributor.authorAdorjan, Michael
dc.contributor.authorRicciardelli, Rosemary
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T12:56:18Z
dc.date.available2025-08-19T12:56:18Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56151
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we reflect on the ethical processes and dilemmas we encountered in almost a decade of qualitative research with teenagers about digital technologies and cyber-risk. Our research underscores both the opportunities and challenges of teenagers’ engagements with digital technologies, including cyberbullying and image-based sexual harassment and abuse (i.e., non-consensual sexting), on popular social media platforms. Our current research explores teenagers’ experiences with cyber-risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, including managing homeschooling (due to lockdowns), online addiction, mental health challenges, and encounters with disinformation and misinformation. We discuss our experiences with focus group facilitation and one-to-one semi-structured interviews, specifically our reflections on ethical processes encountered in the field, such as fostering rapport with young participants given the significant age gaps and our lack of knowledge at times, regarding digital technologies or topics like image-based sexual abuse. We also discuss our experiences conducting research with teenagers under the new capacity to consent ethical framework, which positions children and youth as often having agency to consent to research independently from their parents or legal guardians. Here, we detail reflections on navigating a new approach and highlight some of the considerations arising from ascertaining assent and consent. Centralizing issues of developing rapport, trust, and ethical processes related to interactional dynamics during interviews, the paper provides insights and possible strategies for those conducting research with children and youth.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectYouth Researchen
dc.subjectResearch Ethicsen
dc.subjectFocus Groupsen
dc.subjectQualitative Methodologyen
dc.subjectCyber-Risken
dc.titleEthical Processes and Dilemmas during Research with Youth on Cyber-Risken
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number48-70
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCavanagh, Jay - University of Calgary, Canadaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAdorjan, Michael - University of Calgary, Canadaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRicciardelli, Rosemary - Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canadaen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAdorjan, Michael. 2016. “The Ethical Imagination: Reflections on Conducting Research in Hong Kong.” Pp. 36-51 in Engaging with Ethics in International Criminological Research, edited by M. Adorjan and R. Ricciardelli. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesAdorjan, Michael and Rose Ricciardelli. 2019a. Cyber-Risk and Youth: Digital Citizenship, Privacy and Surveillance. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesAdorjan, Michael and Rosemary Ricciardelli. 2019b. “A New Privacy Paradox? Youth Agentic Practices of Privacy Management Despite ‘Nothing to Hide’ Online.” Canadian Review of Sociology 56(1):8-29.en
dc.referencesBillett, Philip. 2012. “Lessons from the Field: Ethics in Youth Social Capital Research.” Youth Studies Australia 31(3):43-50.en
dc.referencesboyd, danah. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. London: Yale University Press.en
dc.referencesBrooks, Rachel. 2012. “Ethical Challenges of Youth Research: Themes and Issues.” Pp. 179-190 in Negotiating Ethical Challenges in Youth Research, edited by K. te Riele and R. Brooks. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesCooley, Charles Horton. 1902. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner’s.en
dc.referencesDempsey, Laura et al. 2016. “Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research.” Research in Nursing & Health 39(6):480-490.en
dc.referencesDuncan, Rosalie E. et al. 2009. “Is My Mum Going to Hear This? Methodological and Ethical Challenges in Qualitative Health Research with Young People.” Social Science & Medicine 69(11):1691-1699.en
dc.referencesEnsign, Josephine. 2003. “Ethical Issues in Qualitative Health Research with Homeless Youths.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 43(1):43-50.en
dc.referencesEriksson, Anna. 2023. “Cross-Cultural and Comparative Research in Northern Ireland: Insider, Outsider, Other.” Pp. 67-79 in Ethical Dilemmas in International Criminological Research, edited by M. Adorjan and R. Ricciardelli. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesGaylin, Willard. 1977. “The Problems of Proxy Consent.” Social Responsibility: Journalism, Law, Medicine 3:59.en
dc.referencesGaylin, Willard and Ruth Macklin. 1982. Who Speaks for the Child: The problem of Proxy Consent. New York: Plenum Press.en
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face-Work.” Psychiatry 18(3):213-231.en
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.en
dc.referencesGuillemin, Marilys and Lynn Gillam. 2006. Telling Moments: Everyday Ethics in Health Care. East Hawthorn: IP Communications.en
dc.referencesGuillemin, Marilys et al. 2016. “‘Doing Trust’: How Researchers Conceptualize and Enact Trust in Their Research Practice.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11(4):370-381.en
dc.referencesHaddon, Leslie and Sonia Livingstone. 2017. “Risks, Opportunities, and Risky Opportunities: How Children Make Sense of the Online Environment.” Pp. 275-302 in Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts, edited by F. C. Blumberg and P. J. Brooks. Elsevier.en
dc.referencesHaggerty, Kevin D. 2004. “Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics.” Qualitative Sociology 27(4):391-414.en
dc.referencesHochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesLaenen, F. Vander. 2009. “‘I Don’t Trust You, You Are Going to Tell.’ Adolescents with Emotional and Behavioural Disorders Participating in Qualitative Research.” Child: Care, Health and Development 35(3):323-329.en
dc.referencesLassiter, Luke. 2005. The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesLesko, Nancy. 1996. “Denaturalizing Adolescence: The Politics of Contemporary Representations.” Youth & Society 28(2):139- 161.en
dc.referencesLillie, Karen and Pere Ayling. 2021. “Revisiting the Un/Ethical: The Complex Ethics of Elite Studies Research.” Qualitative Research 21(6):890-905.en
dc.referencesLohmeyer, Bailey A. 2020. “‘Keen as Fuck’: Youth Participation in Qualitative Research as ‘Parallel Projects.’” Qualitative Research 20(1):39-55.en
dc.referencesMeloni, Francesca, Karine Vanthuyne, and Cécile Rousseau. 2015. “Towards a Relational Ethics: Rethinking Ethics, Agency, and Dependency in Research with Children and Youth.” Anthropological Theory 15(1):106-123.en
dc.referencesMills, Charles Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin.en
dc.referencesNadin, Sarah et al. 2018. “NorthBEAT’s Capacity-to-Consent Protocol for Obtaining Informed Consent from Youth Evaluation Participants: An Alternative to Parental Consent.” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 33(1):135-153.en
dc.referencesPrice, Bob. 2002. “Laddered Questions and Qualitative Data Research Interviews.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 37(3):273-281.en
dc.referencesRaby, Rebecca. 2007. “Across a Great Gulf? Conducting Research with Adolescents.” Pp. 39-69 in Representing Youth: Methodological Issues in Critical Youth Studies, edited by A. L. Best. New York: NYU Press.en
dc.referencesRicciardelli, Rosemary. 2022. “Ethnographic Experiences of Participating in a Correctional Officer Training Program: An Exploration of Values, Ethics, and Role Conflict.” Ethnography 25(3):294-313. Retrieved July 07, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14661381211069045en
dc.referencesRicciardelli, Rosemary and Michael Adorjan. 2019. “‘If a Girl’s Photo Gets Sent Around, That’s a Way Bigger Deal Than If a Guy’s Photo Gets Sent Around’: Gender, Sexting, and the Teenage Years.” Journal of Gender Studies 28(5):563-577.en
dc.referencesRicciardelli, Rosemary and Stacy Haynes. 2020. “Are We Not All Special? Doing Research with Correctional Populations Inside and Outside of Prison.” Pp. 250-257 in Society, Ethics, and the Law: A Text Reader, edited by D. A. Mackey and K. M. Elvey. Burlington, MA: Jones & Barlett Learning.en
dc.referencesRingrose, Jessica et al. 2022. “Young People’s Experiences of Image-Based Sexual Harassment and Abuse in England and Canada: Toward a Feminist Framing of Technologically Facilitated Sexual Violence.” Women’s Studies International Forum 93:1-9.en
dc.referencesRobinson, Oliver C. 2023. “Probing in Qualitative Research Interviews: Theory and Practice.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 20(3):382-397.en
dc.referencesRooney, Vivien M. 2015. “Consent in Longitudinal Intimacy Research: Adjusting Formal Procedure as a Means of Enhancing Reflexivity in Ethically Important Decisions.” Qualitative Research 15(1):71-84.en
dc.referencesSandhu, Ajay. 2023. “Befriending Police Officers: Reflecting on the Ethics of My Deceptive Buddy Researcher Tactics.” Pp. 40- 52 in Ethical Dilemmas in International Criminological Research, edited by M. Adorjan and R. Ricciardelli. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesSchelbe, Lisa et al. 2015. “Youth Participation in Qualitative Research: Challenges and Possibilities.” Qualitative Social Work 14(4):504-521.en
dc.referencesSpencer, Dale C. 2016. “Ethics as Witnessing: ‘Science,’ Research Ethics, and Victimization.” Pp. 106-22 in Engaging with Ethics in International Criminological Research, edited by M. Adorjan and R. Ricciardelli. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesThorstensson Dávila, Lisa. 2014. “Representing Refugee Youth in Qualitative Research: Questions of Ethics, Language, and Authenticity.” Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 8(1):21-31.en
dc.referencesTickle, Sarah. 2017. “Ethnographic Research with Young People: Methods and Rapport.” Qualitative Research Journal 17(2):66-76.en
dc.referencesTodd-Kvam, Mari and David Rodríguez Goyes. 2023. “Dreams and Nightmares: Interviewing Research Participants Who Have Experienced Psychological Trauma.” Pp. 130-148 in Ethical Dilemmas in International Criminological Research, edited by M. Adorjan and R. Ricciardelli. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesvan den Hoonaard, Will. 2001. “Is Research-Ethics Review a Moral Panic?” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 38(1):19-36.en
dc.referencesvan den Hoonaard, Will. 2002. Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.en
dc.referencesWarin, Jo. 2011. “Ethical Mindfulness and Reflexivity: Managing a Research Relationship with Children and Young People in a 14-Year Qualitative Longitudinal Research (QLR) Study.” Qualitative Inquiry 17(9):805-814.en
dc.referencesWoodgate, Roberta L, Pauline Tennent, and Melanie Zurba. 2017. “Navigating Ethical Challenges in Qualitative Research with Children and Youth through Sustaining Mindful Presence.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16:1-11.en
dc.referencesYang, Keming. 2007. “Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 1(1):19-27.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailCavanagh, Jay - jay.cavanagh@ucalgary.ca
dc.contributor.authorEmailAdorjan, Michael - madorjan@ucalgary.ca
dc.contributor.authorEmailRicciardelli, Rosemary - Rose.Ricciardelli@mi.mun.ca
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.21.3.03
dc.relation.volume21


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
48-70_Cavanagh_et_al.pdf
Size:
907.9Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0