Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Game-Based Technique for Studying Identity Change in Disturbed Communities

dc.contributor.authorKovtiak, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-04T06:26:30Z
dc.date.available2024-12-04T06:26:30Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53865
dc.description.abstractStudying social identity change in non-standard contexts is always challenging. This article presents a new research technique that allows researchers to obtain rich and ethical data even in adverse and fragile conditions. It is based on the popular associative card game and combines projective and game-based data generation methods. The game component adds a playful atmosphere to the research environment and encourages interaction, while the projective aspect allows participants to express identity elements more easily. The features of the new technique presented in this paper are demonstrated through a case study of the post-2020 Belarusian diaspora. In addition to data generation, I describe a coding process that blends deductive and inductive approaches and show how textual and visual data can be analyzed together. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of this innovative technique are assessed, including creative expression, a safe space for dialogue, and the ability to capture nuanced perspectives.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;4en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectAuthoritarian Regimesen
dc.subjectEthical Considerationsen
dc.subjectGame-Based Researchen
dc.subjectIdentity Transformationen
dc.subjectProjective Techniquesen
dc.subjectSensitive Topicsen
dc.titleGame-Based Technique for Studying Identity Change in Disturbed Communitiesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number60-76
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCharles University, Czech Republicen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAskins, Kye and Rachel Pain. 2011. “Contact Zones: Participation, Materiality, and the Messiness of Interaction.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(5):803-821.en
dc.referencesAstapova, Anastasiya. 2017. “Rumor, Humor, and Other Forms of Election Folklore in Non-Democratic Societies: The Case of Belarus.” Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 69:15-48.en
dc.referencesBailey, Peter, Graeme Pritchard, and Hugh Kernohan. 2015. “Gamification in Market Research.” International Journal of Market Research 57(1):17-28.en
dc.referencesBarker, David. 1979. “Appropriate Methodology: An Example Using a Traditional African Board Game to Measure Farmers’ Attitudes and Environmental Images.” The IDS Bulletin 10(2):37-40.en
dc.referencesBlumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesBranthwaite, Alan. 2002. “Investigating the Power of Imagery in Marketing Communication: Evidence‐Based Techniques.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 5(3):164-171.en
dc.referencesCoemans, Sara and Karin Hannes. 2017. “Researchers Under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of Using Arts-Based Methods in Community-Based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations.” Educational Research Review 22:34-49.en
dc.referencesCohenMiller, Anna. 2018. “Creating a Participatory Arts-Based Online Focus Group: Highlighting the Transition from DocMama to Motherscholar.” The Qualitative Report 23(7): Article 17.en
dc.referencesDunn, Victoria and Tom Mellor. 2017. “Creative, Participatory Projects with Young People: Reflections over Five Years.” Research for All 1(2):284-299.en
dc.referencesFereday, Jennifer and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1):80-92.en
dc.referencesGlasius, Marlies et al. 2018. Research, Ethics, and Risk in the Authoritarian Field. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesHarper, Douglas. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17(1):13-26.en
dc.referencesHájek, Martin et al. 2019. “Uneasy Neoliberal Governance in Low-Trust Society: Barriers to Responsibilisation in the Czech Republic.” Sociological Research Online 25(2):201-218.en
dc.referencesJanenova, Saltanat. 2019. “The Boundaries of Research in an Authoritarian State.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919876469en
dc.referencesKoch, Natalie. 2013. “Introduction—Field Methods in ‘Closed Contexts’: Undertaking Research in Authoritarian States and Places.” Area 45(4):390-395.en
dc.referencesLee, Raymond M. 1993. Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesMartin, Roger and Yolande Strengers. 2022. “Playing Games with the Weather: A Card Game Method for Engaging Households in Conversations about Renewable Energy Generation and Everyday Practice.” Geographical Research 60(4):575-588.en
dc.referencesMorgenbesser, Lee and Meredith L. Weiss. 2018. “Survive and Thrive: Field Research in Authoritarian Southeast Asia.” Asian Studies Review 42(3):385-403.en
dc.referencesParker, Lee D. 2009. “Photo‐Elicitation: An Ethno‐Historical Accounting and Management Research Prospect.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 22(7):1111-1129.en
dc.referencesPorr, Caroline et al. 2011. “The Evocative Power of Projective Techniques for the Elicitation of Meaning.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10(1):30-41.en
dc.referencesRohava, Maryia. 2018. “Identity in an Autocratic State. Or What Belarusians Talk about When They Talk about National Identity.” East European Politics and Societies 32(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417741343en
dc.referencesRowley, Jennifer et al. 2012. “Using Card-Based Games to Enhance the Value of Semi-Structured Interviews.” International Journal of Market Research 54(1):93-110.en
dc.referencesRudnik, Lesia. 2021. “Naskol’ko bezopasno osusaut seba belarusy za granicej? – Centr novyh idej [How Safe Do Belarusians Feel Abroad? Center for New Ideas].” Retrieved August 25, 2023 https://newbelarus.vision/belarusians-safety-abroad/en
dc.referencesSmith, Laura G. E., Emma F. Thomas, and Craig McGarty. 2014. “‘We Must Be the Change We Want to See in the World’: Integrating Norms and Identities through Social Interaction.” Political Psychology 36(5):543-557.en
dc.referencesSmithson, Janet. 2000. “Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3(2):103-119.en
dc.referencesVila, Pablo. 2013. “The Importance of Photo-Interviewing as a Research Method in the Study of Identity Construction Processes: An Illustration from the U.S.–Mexico Border.” Visual Anthropology 26(1):51-68.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailelisabeth.kovtiak@fsv.cuni.cz
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.20.4.03
dc.relation.volume20


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
60-76_Kovtiak.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.087MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0