Pokaż uproszczony rekord

The Hegemonization and Counter-Hegemonization of Polish Copyright Discourses

dc.contributor.authorRadomska, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T13:15:53Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T13:15:53Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52968
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the nature and structure of Polish discourses on copyright, specifically revealing to what extent social conflict over copyright is visible within these discourses and presenting the most important parties in this conflict. Following Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s discursive reconstruction of the hegemony, the article indicates that Polish copyright discourses are structured by an alternating sequence of discursive hegemonic and counter-hegemonic practices. The article specifies the most important logic applied within discursive battles over copyright by deconstructing the central dualities visible in Polish copyright debates. Hegemonization and counter-hegemonization of the discourses are indicated based on the discourse analysis of the Polish public debate on copyright and a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews and focus group interviews with representatives of selected parties in the social conflict over copyright.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectCopyright Discourseen
dc.subjectConflict over Copyrighten
dc.subjectHegemonyen
dc.subjectCounter- Hegemonyen
dc.subjectPolanden
dc.titleThe Hegemonization and Counter-Hegemonization of Polish Copyright Discoursesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number80-106
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAdorno, Theodor W. 2001. The Culture Industry. Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London, New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesAndersen, Niels Åkerstrøm. 2003. Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press.en
dc.referencesBurkart, Patrick. 2018. “Political Economy.” Pp. 122-133 in The Craft of Criticism: Critical Media Studies in Practice, edited by M. Kackman and M. C. Kearney. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesCammaerts, Bart. 2011. “The Hegemonic Copyright Regime vs. the Sharing Copyright Users of Music?” Media, Culture & Society 33(3):491-502.en
dc.referencesCartwright, Madison. 2019. “Business Conflict and International Law: The Political Economy of Copyright in the United States.” Regulation & Governance 15:1-16.en
dc.referencesCoombe, Rosemary J. 2000. “Contingent Articulations: A Critical Cultural Studies of Law.” Pp. 21-64 in Law in the Domains of Culture, edited by A. Sarat and T. R. Kearns. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.en
dc.referencesCraig, Carys J. 2019. “Critical Copyright Law and the Politics of ‘IP.’” Pp. 301-323 in Research Handbook on Critical Legal Theory, edited by E. Christodoulidis, R. Dukes, and M. Goldoni. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.en
dc.referencesCreative Poland. 2014. Statute of the Creative Poland Association. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://www.kreatywnapolska.pl/statut-stowarzyszeniaen
dc.referencesDerrida, Jacques. 1988. “Letter to a Japanese Friend.” Pp. 1-6 in Derrida and Différance, edited by D. Wood and R. Bernasconi. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.en
dc.referencesDobusch, Leonard and Sigrid Quack. 2013. “Framing Standards, Mobilizing Users: Copyright versus Fair Use in Transnational Regulation.” Review of International Political Economy 20(1):52-88.en
dc.referencesEwick, Patricia and Susan S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesEwick, Patricia and Susan S. Silbey. 2009. “Patricia Ewick and Susan Silbey and the Common Place of Law.” Pp. 214-226 in Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices, edited by S. Halliday and P. Schmidt. New York: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesFelczner, Krzysztof et al. 2013. Świadomi twórcy. Badanie kompetencji prawnych artystów [Conscious Creators. Examination of the Legal Competences of Artists]. Research report. Warsaw: Fundacja Międzynarodowe Centrum do spraw Badań i Analiz ICRA. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://www.slideshare.net/Sylwiakiewska/wiadomi-twrcy-badanie-kompetencji-prawnych-artystwen
dc.referencesFiliciak, Mirosław, Justyna Hofmokl, and Alek Tarkowski. 2012. The Circulations of Culture—On Social Distribution of Content. Research report. Centrum Cyfrowe Projekt: Polska. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246508en
dc.referencesFrankel, Susy and Daniel Gervais. 2014. “Evolution and Equilibrium: An Introduction.” Pp. 1-11 in The Evolution and Equilibrium of Copyright in the Digital Age, edited by S. Frankel and D. Gervais. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesFredriksson, Martin. 2014. “Copyright Culture and Pirate Politics.” Cultural Studies 28(5-6):1022-1047.en
dc.referencesGeller, Paul Edward. 2013. “Delimiting Intellectual Property: Distinct Approaches to Spillovers.” Pp. 293-307 in Spory o własność intelektualną: Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorom Januszowi Barcie i Ryszardowi Markiewiczowi [Intellectual Property Disputes: Anniversary Book Dedicated to Professors Janusz Barta and Ryszard Markiewicz], edited by A. Matlak and S. Stanisławska-Kloc. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.en
dc.referencesGordon, Wendy J. and Robert G. Bone. 2000. “Copyright.” Pp. 192-194 in Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Volume II. Civil Law and Economics), edited by B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.en
dc.referencesGracz, Katarzyna. 2013. “Bridging the Gaps Between the Social and Legal Norms Concerning Protection of Intellectual and Artistic Creations: On the Crisis of Copyright Law in the Digital Era.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 16(1-2):39-57.en
dc.referencesGracz, Katarzyna and Primavera De Filippi. 2014. “Regulatory Failure of Copyright Law through the Lenses of Autopoietic Systems Theory.” International Journal of Law And Information Technology 22:334-366.en
dc.referencesGramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.en
dc.referencesHalliday, Simon. 2019. “After Hegemony: The Varieties of Legal Consciousness Research.” Social & Legal Studies 28(6):1-20.en
dc.referencesHalliday, Simon and Bronwen Morgan. 2013. “I Fought the Law and the Law Won?” Legal Consciousness and the Critical Imagination 66:1-32.en
dc.referencesHaunss, Sebastian. 2011. “The Politicisation of Intellectual Property: IP Conflicts and Social Change.” WIPO Journal 3(1):129-138.en
dc.referencesHemmungs Wirtén, Eva. 2006. “Out of Sight and Out of Mind. On the Cultural Hegemony of Intellectual Property (Critique).” Cultural Studies 20(2):282-291.en
dc.referencesHerman, Bill D. 2008. “Breaking and Entering My Own Computer: The Contest of Copyright Metaphors.” Communication Law and Policy 13(2):231-274.en
dc.referencesHertogh, Marc. 2018. Nobody’s Law: Legal Consciousness and Legal Alienation in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesHorkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesHunt, Alan. 1990. “Rights and Social Movements: Counter-Hegemonic Strategies.” Journal of Law and Society 17(3):309-328.en
dc.referencesJurczyszyn, Łukasz et al. 2014. Obywatele ACTA [ACTA Citizens]. Research report. Europejskie Centrum Solidarności. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://www.academia.edu/22143522/Obywatele_ACTAen
dc.referencesLaclau, Ernesto. 1996. “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.” Pp. 49-70 in Deconstruction and Pragmatism, edited by C. Mouffe. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesLaclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York: Verso.en
dc.referencesLegal Culture Foundation. 2011. Statute of the Legal Culture Foundation. Retrieved June 17, 2024 http://fundacja.legalnakultura.pl/o-fundacji/statuten
dc.referencesLessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture. New York: Penguin Press.en
dc.referencesLitman, Jessica. 2006. “War and Peace: The 34th Annual Donald C. Brace Lecture.” Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 53(1):101-121.en
dc.referencesModern Poland Foundation. 2022. Statute of the Fundacja Wolne Lektury. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://fundacja.wolnelektury.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Statut-FNP-7.10.2022.pdfen
dc.referencesMouffe, Chantal. 1979. “Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci.” Pp. 168-204 in Gramsci and Marxist Theory, edited by C. Mouffe. London, Boston, Henley: Routledge, Kegan Paul.en
dc.referencesMouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically. London, New York: Verso.en
dc.referencesMylonas, Yiannis. 2011. “Reżimy praw własności intelektualnej jako źródło cierpień [Intellectual Property Rights Regimes as a Source of Suffering].” Pp. 171-187 in Wieczna radość. Ekonomia polityczna społecznej kreatywności [Eternal Joy. The Political Economy of Social Creativity]. Warsaw: Fundacja Nowej Kultury Bęc Zmiana.en
dc.referencesNiezen, Ronald. 2018. “Why Gramsci’s Time Has Come (Again).” SSRN. Retrieved December 12, 2023 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3150638en
dc.referencesPerry, Mark. 2018. “Copyright and (Dis)Harmonisation: Can Developing Nations Prioritise Their Own Public Good in a Global Copyright Hegemony?” Pp. 89-101 in Copyright, Property and the Social Contract, edited by J. Gilchrist and B. Fitzgerald. Cham: Springer.en
dc.referencesPolish Society of Authors ZAiKS. 2023. Statute of the Society of Authors ZAiKS. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://app.zaiks.org.pl/media/vooppujq/statut_2023-sformatowany-tekst-jednolity-z19062023.pdfen
dc.referencesPolish Society of the Phonographic Industry (ZPAV). 1991. Statute of the Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry. Retrieved June 17, 2024 http://www.zpav.pl/pliki/dopobrania/statut.pdfen
dc.referencesPoort, Joost et al. 2018. Global Online Piracy Study. Research report. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Global-Online-Piracy-Study.pdfen
dc.referencesRodríguez, Igor Sádaba. 2003. “Intellectual Property Issue as a Sociological Conflict: Culture and the Economic Logic in a Globalized World.” Paper presented during the 6th ESA Conference. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://www.um.es/ESApapers/Rn6_6a3.pdfen
dc.referencesSantos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2020. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, New Delhi, Singapore: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesSilbey, Susan S. 2005. “After Legal Consciousness.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:323-368.en
dc.referencesTarkowski, Alek and Ewa Majdecka. 2015. The Scale and Ways of Using the Creative Commons License in Poland. An Analysis of License’s Usage on Web Pages. Executive summary of the research report. Centrum Cyfrowe Projekt: Polska. Retrieved June 17, 2024 https://ngoteka.pl/bitstream/handle/item/318/exec%20summary%20crawl.pdf?sequence=1en
dc.referencesTehranian, John. 2012. “Towards a Critical IP Theory: Copyright, Consecration, and Control.” Brigham Young University Law Review 4:1233-1289.en
dc.referencesVetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka. 2015. “EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making. The Cases of Sound Recordings Term Extension and Orphan Works Provisions.” Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 6:146-162.en
dc.referencesVetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka and Trisha Meyer. 2021. “Power to the People? Evaluating the European Commission’s Engagement Efforts in EU Copyright Policy.” Journal of European Integration 43(8):1025-1043.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailewa.radomska@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.20.3.05
dc.relation.volume20


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
80-106_Radomska.pdf
Rozmiar:
593.5KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0