Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPodedworna-Tarnowska, Dorota
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T10:43:50Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T10:43:50Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-31
dc.identifier.issn2391-6478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/50886
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article/hypothesis. The purpose of the article is to identify and assess the underpricing of initial public offerings in Poland on the regulated and alternative markets, considering the division of total underpricing into primary underpricing and secondary underpricing. The study also takes into account different types of IPOs (cold, neutral and hot). Such an approach to measuring underpricing based on the data coming from both the regulated market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange and the alternative market – NewConnect, is pioneering on the Polish market.Methodology. The statistical analysis covers 271 companies debuting on the regulated market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange between 2005 and 2022 and 585 companies debuting on the alternative market between 2007 and 2022. Total underpricing was divided into primary underpricing and secondary underpricing. All IPOs were split into cold, hot, and neutral offerings according to the secondary underpricing. T-tests for estimating the significance of the rate of returns were conducted for both the regulated and alternative markets. The correlations were estimated using Pearson’s index.Results of the research. The results of the analysis show that in Poland, the IPO underpricing occurring on the primary market is significantly positive, representing the remuneration of subscribers for participating in the initial public offering. Moreover, it is higher for an IPO on the alternative market than on the regulated market. In contrast, returns calculated from opening prices to closing prices on the first day of trading are negative in both markets, with lower returns in the NewConnect market. The average primary underpricing for cold IPOs is higher than for hot IPOs for both the regulated and alternative markets. Average secondary underpricing is negative for cold IPOs and positive for hot IPOs on both the regulated market and NewConnect. Furthermore, there is a significant positive correlation between primary and total underpricing regardless the hotness of the IPOs and a positive significant correlation between primary and secondary underpricing occurs only for hot offers while for cold offers it is negative.en
dc.description.abstractCel artykułu/hipoteza. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja i ocena niedowartościowania pierwszej oferty publicznej w Polsce na rynku regulowanym i alternatywnym z uwzględnieniem podziału całkowitego niedowartościowania na niedowartościowanie pierwotne i niedowartościowanie wtórne. W badaniu uwzględniono również różne rodzaje IPO (zimne, neutralne, gorące). Takie podejście do obliczania underpricingu w oparciu o dane pochodzące zarówno z rynku regulowanego Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie, jak i rynku alternatywnego – NewConnect, jest pionierskie na polskim rynku.Metodyka. Analizą statystyczną objęto 271 spółek debiutujących na rynku regulowanym Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie w latach 2005–2022 oraz 585 spółek debiutujących na rynku alternatywnym NewConnect w latach 2007–2022. Dokonano podziału łącznego niedowartościowania na niedowartościowanie pierwotne i niedowartościowanie wtórne. Podzielono IPO na oferty zimne, gorące i neutralne według poziomu wtórnego niedowartościowania. Istotność poziomu stóp zwrotu na rynku regulowanym i alternatywnym oraz różnic między nimi oceniono na podstawie testów T-studenta. Korelacje oszacowano za pomocą wskaźnika Pearsona.Wyniki/Rezultaty badania. Wyniki analizy pokazują, że w Polsce niedowartościowanie w IPO występujące na runku pierwotnym jest istotnie dodatnie, stanowiąc wynagrodzenie subskrybentów za uczestnictwo w pierwszej ofercie publicznej. Ponadto, jest ono wyższe dla debiutów na rynku alternatywnym niż rynku regulowanym. Natomiast stopy zwrotu wyliczane z cen otwarcia i cen zamknięcia w pierwszym dniu notowań są ujemne na obydwu rynkach, przy czym na rynku NewConnect są one niższe. Zarówno na rynku regulowanym, jak i alternatywnym średnie pierwotne niedowartościowanie dla zimnych IPO jest wyższe, niż dla gorących IPO. Średnie niedowartościowanie wtórne jest ujemne dla zimnych IPO i dodatnie dla gorących IPO zarówno na rynku regulowanym, jak i NewConnect. Co więcej, istnieje znacząca dodatnia korelacja pomiędzy pierwotnym i całkowitym niedowartościowaniem niezależnie od gorącego charakteru IPO, a dodatnia znacząca korelacja pomiędzy pierwotnym i wtórnym niedowartościowaniem występuje tylko w przypadku gorących ofert, podczas, gdy w przypadku zimnych ofert jest ona ujemna.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFinanse i Prawo Finansowe;2pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectinitial public offering (IPO)en
dc.subjecttotal underpricingen
dc.subjectprimary underpricingen
dc.subjectsecondary underpricingen
dc.subjectpierwsza oferta publiczna (IPO)pl
dc.subjectniedowartościowanie pierwotnepl
dc.subjectniedowartościowanie wtórnepl
dc.titleA New Approach to Underpricing Phenomenon in Polanden
dc.title.alternativeNowe ujęcie zjawiska underpricingu w Polscepl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number123-144
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSzkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawieen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-5601
dc.referencesAcedo-Ramírez, M.Á. and Ruiz-Cabestre, F.J. (2019). Total and Primary Underpricings in the IPO Market: Are They Explained by the Same Variables? Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, no. 48(2), pp. 134–159.en
dc.referencesAcedo-Ramírez, M.Á., and Ruiz-Cabestre, F.J. (2014). Secondary Price Formation of IPOs on the First Trading Day in the Spanish Market. Revista de Economía Aplicada, no. 22(65), pp. 71–97.en
dc.referencesAggarwal, R. (2000). Stabilization Activities by Underwriters after Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(3), pp. 1075–1103, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00241en
dc.referencesAggarwal, R. (2003). Allocation of Initial Public Offerings and Flipping Activity. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 68(1), pp. 111–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00250-7en
dc.referencesAggarwal, R. and Conroy, P. (2000). Price Discovery in Initial Public Offerings and the Role of the Lead Underwriter. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(6), pp. 2903–2922, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00312en
dc.referencesAggarwal, R., Krigman, L. and Womack, K. (2002). Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 66(1), pp. 105–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00152-6en
dc.referencesAllen, F. and Faulhaber, G.R. (1989). Signaling by Underpricing in the IPO Market, Journal of Financial Economics, no. 23(2), pp. 303–324, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3en
dc.referencesBarry, Ch.B. and Jennings, R.H. (1993). The Opening Price Performance of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock. Financial Management, no. 22(1), pp. 54–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/3665965en
dc.referencesBear, R.M. and Curley, A.J. (1975). Unseasoned Equity Financing. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 10(2), pp. 311–325, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2979038en
dc.referencesBhagat, S., Lu, J. and Rangan, S. (2018). IPO Valuation: The International Evidence. In: D. Cumming, S.A. Johan ed., The Oxford Handbook of IPO, pp. 108–145. New York: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesBradley, D.J., Gonas, J.S., Highfield, M.J. and Roskelley, K.D. (2009). An Examination of IPO Secondary Market Returns. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 15(3), pp. 316–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.003en
dc.referencesCarpentier, C., Cumming, D. and Suret J.M. (2012). The Value of Capital Market Regulation: IPOs Versus Reverse Mergers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, no. 9(1), pp. 56–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01247.xen
dc.referencesChan, K., Wang, J. and Wei, K. (2004). Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 10(3), pp. 409–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00023-3en
dc.referencesChan, Y. (2010). Retail Trading and IPO Returns in the Aftermarket. Financial Management, no. 39(4), pp. 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01119.xen
dc.referencesChang, E., Chen, Ch., Chi, J. and Young, M. (2008). IPO Underpricing in China: New Evidence from the Primary and Secondary Markets. Emerging Markets Review, no. 9(1), pp. 1–16.en
dc.referencesDavies, J.A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.en
dc.referencesDerrien, F. (2005). IPO Pricing in “Hot” Market Conditions: Who Leaves Money on the Table? The Journal of Finance, no. 60(1), pp. 487–521, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00736.xen
dc.referencesDudycz, T. and Brycz B. (2017). What Drives the Amount of Capital Raised at IPO? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Argumenta Oeconomica, no. 2(39), pp. 61–89, https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2017.2.03en
dc.referencesEllis, K. (2006). Who trades IPOs? A close look at the first days of trading. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 79(2), pp. 339–363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.006en
dc.referencesEllis, K., Michaely R. and O’Hara M. (2000). When the Underwriter Is the Market Maker: An Examination of Trading in the IPO Aftermarket. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(3), pp. 1039–1074, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00240en
dc.referencesGale, I. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1989). The Informational Content of Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, no. 44(2), pp. 469–477, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb05066.xen
dc.referencesHadro, D. and Pauka, M. (2019). Underpricing on the Selected European Alternative Investment Markets. Financial Internet Quarterly “e-Finanse”, no. 15(2), pp. 87–94, https://doi.org/10.2478/fiqf-2019-0014en
dc.referencesHe, P. (2007). A Theory of IPO Waves. The Review of Financial Studies, no. 20(4), pp. 983–1020, https://doi.org/10.1093/revfin/hhm004en
dc.referencesHelwege, J. and Liang, N. (2004). Initial Public Offerings in Hot and Cold Markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 39(3), pp. 541–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004026en
dc.referencesIbbotson, R.G. (1975). Price Performance of Common Stock New Issues. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 2(3), pp. 235–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(75)90015-Xen
dc.referencesIbbotson, R.G. and Jaffe, J. (1975). ‘Hot issue’ markets. Journal of Finance, no. 30(4), pp. 1027–1042, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(75)90015-Xen
dc.referencesIbbotson, R.G., Sindelar, J.L. and Ritter, J.R. (1988). Initial public offerings. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, no. 1(2), pp. 37–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1988.tb00164.xen
dc.referencesIbbotson, R.G., Sindelar, J.L. and Ritter, J.R. (1994). The Market’s Problems with the Pricing of Initial Public Offering. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, no. 7(1), pp. 66–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00395.xen
dc.referencesJohan, S.A. (2010). Listing standards as a signal of IPO preparedness and quality. International Review of Law and Economics, no. 30(2), pp. 128–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.12.001en
dc.referencesKrigman, L., Shaw, W.H. and Womack, K.L. (1999). The Persistence of IPO Mispricing and the Predictive Power of Flipping. The Journal of Finance, no. 54(3), pp. 1015–1044, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00135en
dc.referencesLizińska, J. and Czapiewski, I. (2015). Determinanty underpricingu w Polsce i na innych rynkach wschodzących. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 386, s. 112–125.en
dc.referencesLizińska, J. and Czapiewski, L. (2014). Performance of Polish IPO Firms: Size and Proitability Effect. Gospodarka Narodowa, no. 1, pp. 53–71, https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100877en
dc.referencesLjungquvist, A. (2007). IPO Underpricing. In: B.E. Eckbo ed., Handbook of Corporate Finance, pp. 375–422. North Holland: Elsevier.en
dc.referencesLjungqvist, A.P. (1997). Pricing initial public offerings: Further evidence from Germany. European Economic Review, no. 41(7), pp. 1309–1320, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00035-9en
dc.referencesLoughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (1995). The New Issues Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, no. 50(1), pp. 23–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.xen
dc.referencesLoughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (2002). Why Don’t Issuers Get Upset about Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs? The Review of Financial Studies, no. 15(2), pp. 413–443, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.413en
dc.referencesLoughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (2004). Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? Financial Management, no. 3(4), pp. 5–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.331780en
dc.referencesLoughran, T., Ritter, J.R. and Rydqvist, K. (1994). Initial Public Offerings: International Insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, no. 2, pp. 165–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-538X(94)90016-7en
dc.referencesLowry, M. (2003). Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? Journal of Financial Economics, no. 67(1), pp. 3–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00230-1en
dc.referencesLowry, M., Officer, M.S. and Schwert, G.W. (2010). The Variability of IPO Initial Returns. The Journal of Finance, no. 65(2), pp. 425–465, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01540.xen
dc.referencesMąka, M. (2008). Stabilizowanie kursów akcji i praw do akcji w świetle prawa polskiego i prawa wspólnotowego. Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego, nr 1, s. 19–31.en
dc.referencesMcDonald, J.G. and Fisher, A.K. (1972). New-Issue Stock Price Behavior. The Journal of Finance, no. 27(1), pp. 97–102, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00624.xen
dc.referencesMiller, E.E. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, no. 32(4), pp. 1151–1168, https://doi.org/10.2307/2326520en
dc.referencesMiller, R.E. and Reilly, F.K. (1987). An Examination of Mispricing, Returns, and Uncertainty for Initial Public Offerings. Financial Management, no. 16(2), pp. 33–38, https://doi.org/10.2307/3666001en
dc.referencesMizerka, J. i Lizińska, J., red. (2017). Pierwsze oferty publiczne w Polsce i na świecie. Kontrowersje wokół anomalii rynkowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.en
dc.referencesNeuberger, B.M. and Hammond, C.T. (1974). A Study of Underwriters’ Experience with Unseasoned New Issues. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 9(2), pp. 165–177, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2330092en
dc.referencesPerera, W. and Kulendran, N. (2016). New evidence of short-run underpricing in Australian IPOs. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, no. 13(2), pp. 99–108, http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2).2016.11en
dc.referencesPodedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2020). Niedowartościowanie spółek debiutujących na rynku głównym i alternatywnym Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. W: P. Antonowicz, P. Galiński, P. Pisarewicz, red., Perspektywa ekonomiczna, finansowa i prawna kreowania wartości w gospodarce, s. 267–281. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.en
dc.referencesPodedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2022). Costs of IPO in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, no. 56(4), pp. 135–160, http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2022.56.4.135-160en
dc.referencesPomykalski, P. and Domagalski, M. (2015). IPO Underpricing and Financial Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy in Poland. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, no. 1(310), pp. 117–132, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.09en
dc.referencesPuławski, M. (2013). Koszt pierwszej oferty publicznej na rynku akcji w Polsce w latach 2008–2012. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, nr 63, s. 435–447.en
dc.referencesReilly, F.K. (1973). Further Evidence on Short-Run Results for New Issue Investors. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 8(1), pp. 83–90, https://doi.org/10.2307/2329750en
dc.referencesReilly, F.K. (1977). New Issues Revisited. Financial Management, no. 6(4), pp. 28–42, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3664963en
dc.referencesReilly, F.K. and Hatfield, K. (1969). Investor Experience with New Stock Issues. Financial Analysts Journal, no. 25(5), pp. 73–80, http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v25.n5.73en
dc.referencesRitter, J.R. (1984). The “Hot Issue” Market of 1980. The Journal of Business, no. 57(2), pp. 215–240, http://doi.org/10.1086/296260en
dc.referencesRitter, J.R. (1987). The Costs of Going Public. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 19(2), pp. 269–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90005-5en
dc.referencesRitter, J.R. (2003). Differences between European and American IPO Markets. European Financial Management, no. 9(4), pp. 421–434, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00230en
dc.referencesRitter, J.R. and Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. The Journal of Finance, no. 57(4), pp. 1795–1828, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00478en
dc.referencesRock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced? Journal of Financial Economics, no. 15, pp. 187–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1en
dc.referencesRydqvist, K. and Hogholm, K. (1995). Going public in the 1980s: Evidence from Sweden. European Financial Management, no. 1(3), pp. 287–315, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.1995.tb00021.xen
dc.referencesSchultz, P.H. and Zaman, M.A. (1994). After Market Support and Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 35(2), pp. 199–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90004-3en
dc.referencesShiller, R.J. (1990). Speculative Prices and Popular Models. Journal of Economics Perspectives, no. 4(2), pp. 55–65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.55en
dc.referencesSieradzki, R. (2016). Niedowartościowanie pierwotnych ofert publicznych na przykładzie akcji notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Rozprawa doktorska. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie.en
dc.referencesSiwek, P. (2005). Praktyka pierwszych ofert publicznych w Polsce. Warszawa: CeDeWu.en
dc.referencesStoll, H.R. and Curley, A.J. (1970). Small Business and the New Issues Market for Equities. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 5(3), pp. 309–322, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2329998en
dc.referencesStoughton, N.M., Wong, K.P. and Zechner, J. (2001). IPOs and Product Quality. The Journal of Business, no. 74(3), pp. 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1086/321931en
dc.referencesSukacz, D. (2005). Pierwsze oferty publiczne na rynkach kapitałowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.en
dc.referencesWelch, I. (1992). Sequential Sales, learning, and Cascades. The Journal of Finance, no. 47(2), pp. 695–732, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04406.xen
dc.referencesVismara, S., Paleari, S. and Ritter, J.R. (2012). Europe’s Second Markets for Small Companies. European Financial Management, no. 18(3), pp. 352–388, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00641.xen
dc.referencesZarzecki, D. and Wołoszyn, A. (2013). The impact Impact of the January Eeffect on the IPO Underpricing in Poland. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, no. 13(1), pp. 121–135, https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-28en
dc.contributor.authorEmaildpoded@sgh.waw.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-6478.S2.2023.06


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/