Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJasiński, Andrzej H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-28T13:30:20Z
dc.date.available2024-02-28T13:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/50482
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this paper is to answer the following question: Can any interdependencies be identified between technological innovation in the Polish industry and science & technology (S&T) policy in the past decade? For this purpose, a model of the innovation scene with three main actors (industry, science and government) may be useful. The overall picture of technological change processes in Poland is ambiguous: neither bad, nor good; both negative and positive tendencies can be identified. A principle components analysis has been applied to describe a course of innovation performance. An interesting regularity can then be seen: innovation performance reacted in the same direction but with a one-year delay to macro-economic dynamics. So, the innovation activity followed a cyclical development of the national economy. In turn, S&T policy often was delayed (drifted with the cycle) and was pro cyclical. Thus, in the period under analysis (1989-2000), real processes of technological change proceeded independently of the measures being undertaken by the government for science and technology but in accordance with phases of business cycle. ft is difficult to observe any elear correlations between innovation activity and S&Tpolicy. Concluding, technological progress was taking place in Poland under the influence of (a) macro-economic regulations, (b) market forces and (c) the inflow of foreign technical thought rather than being influenced by public policypl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;1-2
dc.titlePublic S&T Policy and Technological Innovation in Poland, 1989-2000pl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number150-166pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Warsawpl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesEtzkowitz H. and Leydesdorff L. (1995), The Triple Helix: University - Jndustry - Government Relations, EASST Review, No 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesGUS (1998), Innovation Activities of Polish Industrial Enterprises in 1994-1996, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesJasinski A. H. (1999), Main Actors and their Roles on the Scene of Innovation, paper for Summer Academy on Technology Studies, Deutschlandsberg, Austria, 11-16 July.pl_PL
dc.referencesJasinski A. H. (2000), Technology Transfer in Poland: A Poor State of Affairs and a Wavering Policy, Science and Public Policy, No 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesJasinski A. H. (2001), Public Policy and Technological Change in Poland, 1989-1999, report within „Macrotec project", Warsaw, December.pl_PL
dc.referencesKBN (1993), The Basis for the National Science and Technology Policy, State Committee for Scientific Research, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesKBN (1995), Guidelines for Innovation Policy in Poland, State Committee for Scientific Research, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesKBN (1997), The Supplement to The Basis for the National Science and Technology Policy, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesKBN (1999), Directions of National Innovation Policy till 2002, State Committee for Scientific Research, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesLundvall B. A., ed. (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesMorrison D. F. (1976), Multivariate Statistical Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesNelson R. and Rosenberg N. (1993), National Jnnovation Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesTidd J., Bessant J. and Pavitt K. (1997), Managing Jnnovation, Wiley, Chichester.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume5pl_PL
dc.disciplineekonomia i finansepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record