Abstract
In the paper I present Donald Davidson’s solution of the problem of freedom against
the background of his complex philosophical system. In spite of the fact that freedom
understood as anomality was justified by Davidson by means of his philosophy
of language I argue that it can be fully appreciated against the background of his
philosophy of action. I argue also that the phenomenon of weak will explained by
Davidson in terms of prima facie judgements and sans-phrase judgement is a necessary
condition of freedom conceived as anomaly. In the end I indicate that in spite of superficial
analogies suggested by Davidson his solution of the problem of freedom is
incomparable with the Kantian one.