Żarty na bok: Kognitywne mechanizmy w dowcipach

Dynel, Marta

dc.contributor.author	Dynel, Marta
dc.contributor.editor	Kwiatkowska, Alina
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-13T15:54:18Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-13T15:54:18Z
dc.date.issued	2011
dc.identifier.citation	Dynel M., Żarty na bok – kognitywne mechanizmy w dowcipach, [w:] Przestrzenie kognitywnych poszukiwań, Kwiatkowska A. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011, s. 123-137, https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-669-7.10	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-7525-669-7
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42127
dc.description	Celem badaczki w niniejszym artykule jest przedstawienie nowej propozycji kategoryzacji dowcipów zależnie od sposobu, w jaki dokonuje się ich analizy linearnej. Autorka wyróżnia trzy typy dowcipów określonych metaforycznie jako: „czerwone światło”, „skrzyżowanie” oraz „ślepa uliczka”.	pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorship	Udostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Kwiatkowska A. (red.), Przestrzenie kognitywnych poszukiwań, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	dowcipy	pl_PL
dc.subject	kognitywizm	pl_PL
dc.subject	analiza linearna	pl_PL
dc.title	Żarty na bok: Kognitywne mechanizmy w dowcipach	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.rights.holder	© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011	pl_PL
dc.page.number	123-137	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Uniwersytet Łódzki	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-920-4
dc.references	Attardo, S. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York: Mouton.	pl_PL
dc.references	Attardo, S. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.	pl_PL
dc.references	Attardo, S., C. Hempelmann, S. Di Maio. 2002. Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor 15, 3–46.	pl_PL
dc.references	Attardo, S., Raskin, V. 1991. Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor 4, 293–348.	pl_PL
dc.references	Attardo, S., et al. 1994. The linear organization of jokes: Analysis of two thousand texts. Humor 7, 27–54.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bever, T. 1970. The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures. Cognition and the Development of Language, red. J. Hayes, 279–361. London: Wiley.	pl_PL
dc.references	Blank, A. 2003. Polysemy in the lexicon and in discourse. W: Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language, red. B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman i D. Clarke, Berlin: Mouton. 267–293.	pl_PL
dc.references	Brzozowska, D. 2000. O Dowcipach Polskich i Angielskich. Aspekty językowo-kulturowe. Uniwersytet Opolski: Opolskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk.	pl_PL
dc.references	Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.	pl_PL
dc.references	Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps. Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Coulson, S., Urbach, T., Kutas, M. 2006. Looking back: Joke comprehension and the space structuring model. Humor 19, 229–250.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dascal, M. 1985. Language use in jokes and dreams: sociopragmatics vs. psychopragmatics. Language and Communication 5, 95–106.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dolitsky, M. 1992. Aspects of the unsaid in humour. Humor 5, 33–43.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dynel, M. 2009. Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fill, A. 1992. Vision and revisions: A type of pun based on idiomatised complex words. W: Language and civilization: A Concerted Profusion on Essays and Studies in Honour of Otto Heitsch, Vol. 2, red. C. Blank, T. Kirschner, D. Gutch i J. Gilbert, 551–563. Frunkfurt: Peter Lang.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fish, S. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke UP.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fish, S. 1999. Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Forabosco, G. 1992. Cognitive aspects of the humour process: the concept of incongruity. Humor 5, 9–26.	pl_PL
dc.references	Forabosco, G. 2008. Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4, 45–62.	pl_PL
dc.references	Frazier, L. 1978. On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.	pl_PL
dc.references	Frazier, L., Rayner, K. 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movement in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive psychology 14, 178–210.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gloger, Z. 1972. Encyklopedia Staropolska. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.	pl_PL
dc.references	Giora, R. 1991. On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics 16, 465–485.	pl_PL
dc.references	Giora, R. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Grice, P.H. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, red. P. Cole i H. Morgan, New York: Academic Press. 41–58.	pl_PL
dc.references	Grzegorczykowa, R. 2002. Wprowadzenie do Semantyki Językoznawczej. Warszawa: PWN.	pl_PL
dc.references	Just, M., Carpenter, P. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87, 329–354.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kamp, H. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. W: Formal Methods in the Study of Language, red. J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen i M. Stokhof. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, 277–322.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kamp, H., Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kopaliński, W. 1967/1975. Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych. Warszawa http://www.slownik-online.pl/	pl_PL
dc.references	Hockett, C. 1961. Grammar for the hearer. Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, red. R. Jakobson. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 220–36.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hockett, C. 1972/1977. Jokes. W: The View From Language: Selected Essays. Athens: University of Georgia Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Leeper, R. 1932. A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning – the development of sensory organization. Journal of Genetic Psychology 46, 41–75.	pl_PL
dc.references	Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Majewska, M. 2002. Homonimia i homonimy w opisie językoznawczym, Warszawa.	pl_PL
dc.references	Mey, J. 1991. Pragmatic gardens and their magic. Poetics 20, 233–245.	pl_PL
dc.references	Milne, R. 1982. Predicting garden path sentences. Cognitive Science: Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Language 6, 349–373.	pl_PL
dc.references	Norrick, N. 2001. On the conversational performance of narrative jokes: toward an account of timing. Humor 14, 255–274.	pl_PL
dc.references	Partington, A. 1998. Patterns and Meanings. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	Partington, A. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge.	pl_PL
dc.references	Paulos, J. 1980. Mathematics and Humour. Chicago: Chicago University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Pritchett, B. 1992. Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.	pl_PL
dc.references	Raskin, V. 1987. Linguistic heuristics of humor: A script-based semantic approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 65, 11–25.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ritchie, G. 1999. Developing the Incongruity-Resolution Theory. Proceedings of AISB Symposium on Creative Language: Stories and Humour http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~gritchie/papers/aisb99.pdf	pl_PL
dc.references	Ritchie, G. 2002. The Structure of Forced Reinterpretation Jokes. Proceedings of April Fools’ Day Workshop on Computational Humour, red. O. Stock, C. Strapparava, A. Nijholt. Enschede, Netherlands, 47–56.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ritchie, G. 2004. The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. London: Routledge.	pl_PL
dc.references	Shultz, T. 1972. The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 13: 456–477.	pl_PL
dc.references	Suls, J. 1972. A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information processing analysis. W: The Psychology of Humor, red. J. Goldstein, P. McGhee. New York: Academic Press. 81–100.	pl_PL
dc.references	Suls, J. 1983. Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. W: Handbook of Humor Research, Vol. 1, red. P. McGhee, J. Goldstein. New York: Springer Verlag, 39–57.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tabakowska, E. 2001. Kognitywne Podstawy Języka i Językoznawstwa, Kraków: Universitas.	pl_PL
dc.references	Van Dijk, T.A. i W. Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Harcourt Brace.	pl_PL
dc.references	Yamaguchi, H. 1988. How to pull strings with words: Deceptive violations in the garden- path joke. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 323–337.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ziv, A. 1984. Personality and Sense of Humour. New York: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/7525-669-7.10
dc.discipline	językoznawstwo	pl_PL