• polski
    • English
  • English 
    • polski
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
  • Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 40 (1/2018)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
  • Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 40 (1/2018)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Filozoficzne korzenie konfliktu między Marksem a Bakuninem

No Thumbnail [100%x80]
View/Open
H40.11.Robertson.pdf (677.0Kb)
Date
2018
Author
Robertson, Ann
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This essay explores the underlying philosophical differences separating Marxism and anarchism by examining the specific philosophies of Marx and Bakunin. The conflicting philosophical foundations of these two philosophers reveal why there were irreconcilable political and strategic differences between them, even though both were members of the First International and both were equally dedicated to the abolition of capitalism. Bakunin, for example, posited humans as basically natural creatures with permanently fixed natures while for Marx humans have been evolving throughout history, becoming more rational in the process, and thus exhibiting different human natures in different historical periods. Accordingly, both authors adopted starkly different conceptions of freedom, where Bakunin sought to identify freedom with acting according to natural impulses while Marx defined it in terms of conscious, rational collective action. With these contrasting philosophical foundations Marx and Bakunin proceeded to outline incompatible theories of the State and diverging strategies in abolishing it; they disagreed on who would be most likely to lead a revolutionary upheaval; and they differed on what organizational forms would be needed to accomplish their revolutionary aims.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33774
Collections
  • Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 40 (1/2018) [11]

University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 


University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 

NoThumbnail