The quality of inter-organizational relations and the intention of commercialization of knowledge by academic entrepreneurs – a theoretical approach and outline of research

Kobylińska, Urszula

dc.contributor.author	Kobylińska, Urszula
dc.contributor.editor	Michałkiewicz, Anna
dc.contributor.editor	Mierzejewska, Wioletta
dc.date.accessioned	2021-02-05T18:54:06Z
dc.date.available	2021-02-05T18:54:06Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	Kobylińska U., The quality of inter-organizational relations and the intention of commercialization of knowledge by academic entrepreneurs – a theoretical approach and outline of research, [w:] Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020, s. 461-477, doi: 10.18778/8220-333-2.29	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-333-2
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33344
dc.description.abstract	The main purpose of this article is to develop a framework to study the impact of high-quality inter-organizational relationships (between scientists and supporting institutions) on academic entrepreneurs’ willingness to commercialize research results. The concept of the theoretical model was developed on the basis of a literature review and available empirical research results. The specific objectives of the article include the identification of key institutions supporting academic entrepreneurs, and the identification of factors building the quality of inter-organizational relations. The developed model is only a preliminary and partial proposal to measure the intent of commercializing research results by academic entrepreneurs, taking into account one of the important aspects of this process, namely the quality of relationships.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	academic entrepreneurship	pl_PL
dc.subject	inter-organizational relations	pl_PL
dc.subject	quality of relationships	pl_PL
dc.title	The quality of inter-organizational relations and the intention of commercialization of knowledge by academic entrepreneurs – a theoretical approach and outline of research	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	461-477	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Bialystok University of Technology	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-334-9
dc.references	Ashai B., Smirnova M., Kouchtch S., Yu Q., Barnes B. R., Naudé P., Assesing relationship quality in four business‐to‐business markets, “Marketing Intelligence & Planning” 2009, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 86–102.	pl_PL
dc.references	Athanasopoulou P., Relationship quality: a critical literature review and research agenda, “European Journal of Marketing” 2009, vol. 43, no. 5–6, pp. 583–610.	pl_PL
dc.references	Autio E., Kenney M., Mustar P., Siegel D., Wright M., Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context, “Research Policy” 2014, vol. 43, pp. 1097–1108.	pl_PL
dc.references	Baker T. L., Simpson P.M., Siguaw J. A., The impact of suppliers’ perceptions of reseller market orientation on key relationship constructs, “Journal of the Academy Marketing Science” 1999, vol. 27, pp. 50–57.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barry J. M., Doney P.M., Cross-Cultural Examination of Relationship Quality, “Journal of Global Marketing” 2011, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 305–323.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bowen J. T., Shoemaker S., Loyalty: A Strategic Commitment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant, “Administration Quarterly” 1998, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 12–25.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bozeman B., Gaughan M., Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry, “Research Policy” 2007, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 694–707.	pl_PL
dc.references	Crosby L., Evans K., Cowles D., Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective, “Journal of Marketing” 1990, vol. 54, pp. 68–81.	pl_PL
dc.references	Danik L., Wpływ kultury na jakość relacji w międzynarodowej współpracy przedsiębiorstw, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	De Cannie’re M. H., De Pelsmacker P., Geuens M., Relationship Quality and Purchase Intention and Behavior: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Strength, “Journal of Business Psychology” 2010, vol. 25, pp. 87–98.	pl_PL
dc.references	Doaei H., Rezaei A., Khajei R., The Impact of Relationship Marketing Tactics on Customer Loyalty: The Mediation Role of Relationship Quality, “International Journal of Business Administration” 2011, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 83–93.	pl_PL
dc.references	Emami J., Layevardi M., Fakharmanesh S., An Integrated Model in Customer Loyalty Context: Relationship Quality and Relationship Marketing View, “Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences” 2013, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 399–407.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ghzaiel K., Akrout F., Dimensions and Antecedents of Relationship Quality in a Business-to-Business Context: An Exploratory Study, “Journal of Supply Chain and Customer Relationship Management” 2012, vol. 2012, pp. 1–17.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hechavaria D. M., Ingram A., A Review of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and the Entrepreneurial Society in the US: An Exploration with the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Dataset, “Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship” 2014, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–35.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner K. P., Gremler D. D., Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes: An Integration of Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality, “Journal of Service Research” 2002, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 230–247.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hoppner J. J., Griffith D. A., White R. C., Reciprocity in Relationship Marketing: A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Effects of Equivalence and immediacy on Relationship Quality and Satisfaction with Performance, “Journal of International Marketing” 2015, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 64–83.	pl_PL
dc.references	Huang H. H., Wan-Ping P., Effects of promotion on relationship quality and customer loyalty in the airline industry: The relationship marketing approach, “African Journal of Business Management” 2011, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 4403–4414.	pl_PL
dc.references	Huntley J. K., Conceptualization and measurement of relationship quality: Linking relationship quality to actual sales and recommendation intention, “Industrial Marketing Management” 2006, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 703–714.	pl_PL
dc.references	Isenberg D. J., How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution, “Harvard Business Review” 2010, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2–11.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kobylińska U., Barriers and Factors Influencing the Level of Cooperation of Businesses with Public Administration Institutes: Poland as a Case Study, [in:] V. Potocan, P. Kalinic, A. Vuletic (eds), 26th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – “Building Resilient Society”: Book of Proceedings, Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, Zagreb 2018, pp. 222–231	pl_PL
dc.references	Lages C., Lages C. R., Lages L. F., The RELQUAL scale: a measure of relationship quality in export market ventures, “Journal of Business Research” 2005, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1040–1048.	pl_PL
dc.references	Leonidou L., Palihawadana D., Theodosiou M., An integrated model of the behavioural dimensions of industrial buyer-seller relationship, “European Journal of Marketing” 2006, vol. 40, no. 1–2, pp. 145–174.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lin C. P., Ding C. G., Evaluating group differences in gender during the formation of relationship quality and loyalty in ISP service, “Journal of Organizational and End User Computing” 2005, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 38–62.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lockett A., Wright M., Siegel D., Ensley M. D., The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications, “Research Policy” 2005, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 918–933.	pl_PL
dc.references	Maia C., Claro J., The role of a Proof of Concept Center in a university ecosystem: An exploratory study, “Journal of Technology Transfer” 2013, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 641–650.	pl_PL
dc.references	Moore J. F., A new ecology of competition, “Harvard Business Review” 1993, May – June, pp. 75–86.	pl_PL
dc.references	North D., Institutions, Institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nyaga G. N., Whipple J. M., Lynch D. F., Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ?, “Journal of Operational Management” 2010, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 101–114.	pl_PL
dc.references	Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W., To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer, “The Journal of Technology Transfer” 2001, vol. 26, pp. 99–114.	pl_PL
dc.references	Perkmann M., Tartari V., Mckelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., D’Este P., Academic Engagement and Commercialization: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations, “Research Policy” 2003, vol. 42, pp. 423–442.	pl_PL
dc.references	Radosevich R., A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources, “International Journal of Technology Management” 1995, vol. 10, pp. 879–893.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ramaseshan B., Yip L. S.C., Pae J. H., Power, satisfaction and relationship commitment in Chinese store – tenant relationship and their impact on performance, “Journal of Retailing” 2006, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 63–70.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sherwood A., University and the entrepreneurship ecosystem, [in:] S. Globerman, J. Clemens (eds), Demographics and Entrepreneurship: Mitigating the Effects of an Aging Population, Fraser Institute, Canada 2018, pp. 239–283.	pl_PL
dc.references	Siegel D. S., Phan P., Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education, [in:] G. Libecap (ed.), University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, “Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth” 2005, vol. 16, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 1–38.	pl_PL
dc.references	Siegel D. S., Waldman D., Link A., Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, “Research Policy” 2003, vol. 32, pp. 27–48.	pl_PL
dc.references	The Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurial ecosystem diagnostic toolkit, Aspen Institute, UK 2013.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tijssen J. W., Universities and industrially relevant science: toward measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation, “Research Policy” 2006, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1569–1585.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tung B., Carlson J., Modeling a Formative Measure of Relationship Quality and Its Effects: Evidence From the Hong Kong Retail Banking Industry, “Services Marketing Quarterly” 2013, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 139–158.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ulaga W., Eggert A., Relationship Value and Relationship Quality: Broadening the Nomological Network of Business-to-Business Relationships, “European Journal of Marketing” 2006, vol. 40, pp. 311–327.	pl_PL
dc.references	Wieselquist J., Rusbult C. E., Foster C. A., Agnew C. R., Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1999, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 942–966.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-333-2.29