Scientific reasoning in management. The role of abduction in research process design

Szydło, Joanna

dc.contributor.author	Szydło, Joanna
dc.contributor.editor	Michałkiewicz, Anna
dc.contributor.editor	Mierzejewska, Wioletta
dc.date.accessioned	2021-02-03T13:48:33Z
dc.date.available	2021-02-03T13:48:33Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	Szydło J., Scientific reasoning in management. The role of abduction in research process design, [w:] Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020, s. 115-129, doi: 10.18778/8220-333-2.07	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-333-2
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33297
dc.description.abstract	Management as a science that studies the social and economic sphere exists, by definition, on the borderline of many disciplines, which predisposes it to undertake considerations relating to the choice of the right way of thinking. The subject discussed in the text is hardly explored in management sciences, but it is very important due to the consequences resulting from the adoption of wrong methodological assumptions. Although the article is theoretical by nature, it raises significant issues concerning the preparation of the research process. The aim of the article is to broaden researchers’ awareness of the application of scientific reasoning. The empirical nature of management sciences makes deductive reasoning not always adequate for the description and evaluation of occurring phenomena, whereas inductive reasoning does not allow for drawing conclusions that can be generalised. Therefore, attention was focused on abduction. The author presents arguments for the complementarity of abduction as opposed to induction and deduction as well as a scheme of abductive reasoning. It has been recognised that the number of cognitive and practical problems in the world of organisations forces the absorption of new instruments.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	scientific reasoning	pl_PL
dc.subject	deduction	pl_PL
dc.subject	induction	pl_PL
dc.subject	abduction	pl_PL
dc.subject	abduction diagram	pl_PL
dc.title	Scientific reasoning in management. The role of abduction in research process design	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	115-129	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Bialystok University of Technology	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-334-9
dc.references	Ajdukiewicz K., Język i poznanie, vol. 2, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006.	pl_PL
dc.references	Aliseda A., Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation, Springer, Dordrecht 2006.	pl_PL
dc.references	Aliseda A., The Logic of Abduction: An Introduction, Springer Handbooks, Heidelberg – Berlin 2017.	pl_PL
dc.references	Arystoteles, Dzieła wszystkie, vol. 1, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2003.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bacon F., Novum Organum, serie: Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii, PWN, Warszawa 1955.	pl_PL
dc.references	Błaszczyk P., Mrówka K., Euklides, “Elementy”. Księgi V–VI, http://www.eudoxos.pl/wp-content /uploads/2013/04/Euklides_V_VI.pdf (accessed: 15.07.2019).	pl_PL
dc.references	Bocheński J. M., Współczesne metody myślenia, Wydawnictwo W drodze, Poznań 1992.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bueno O., Styles of reasoning: A pluralist view, “Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A” 2012, vol. 43(4), pp. 657–665.	pl_PL
dc.references	Campos D. G., On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the best explanation, “Synthese” 2011, vol. 180(3), pp. 419–442.	pl_PL
dc.references	Carnap L., Logiczna struktura świata, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2011.	pl_PL
dc.references	Cichowicz E., Rollnik-Sadowska E., Inclusive growth in CEE countries as a determinant of sustainable development, “Sustainability” 2018, vol. 10, no. 11, 3973.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ciesielski M., Abdukcja w naukach o zarządzaniu, “Przegląd Organizacji” 2014, no. 11, pp. 3–6.	pl_PL
dc.references	Frankfort-Nachmias C., Nachmias D., Hornowska E., Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2001.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gasparski W., Wiedza o organizacji i zarządzaniu oraz jej poznawcze ugruntowanie, “Współczesne Zarządzanie” 2017, no. 1, pp. 34–47.	pl_PL
dc.references	Glińska E., Siemieniako D., Binge drinking in relation to services – bibliometric analysis of scientific research directions, “Engineering Management in Production and Services” 2018, vol. 10(1), pp. 45–54.	pl_PL
dc.references	Greeno J. G., Concepts in activities and discourses, “Mind, Culture and Activity” 2012, vol. 19, issue 3, pp. 310–313.	pl_PL
dc.references	Grobler A., Metodologia nauk, Wydawnictwo Aureus, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków 2008.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gudanowska A. E., Modern research trends within technology management in the light of selected publications, “Procedia Engineering” 2017, vol. 182, pp. 247–254.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hajduk Z., Ogólna metodologia nauk, Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, Lublin 2001.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hartshorne Ch., Weiss P. (eds), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1931.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hintikka J., What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology, “Trans-actions of Charles S. Peirce Society” 1998, vol. 34(3), pp. 503–533.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hume D., A Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1965, http://snd.hegemonikon .pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/David-Hume-Traktat-o-naturze-ludzkiej3.pdf (accessed: 8.07.2019).	pl_PL
dc.references	Jeszka A. M., Problemy badawcze i hipotezy w naukach o zarządzaniu, “Organizacja i Kierowanie/Organization and Management” 2013, no. 5(158), pp. 31–39.	pl_PL
dc.references	Josephson J. R., Josephson S. G. (eds), Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kant I., Krytyka czystego rozumu, https://wolnelektury.pl/media/book/pdf/krytyka-czystego-ro zumu.pdf (accessed: 6.05.2019).	pl_PL
dc.references	Khan S., Krell M., Scientific Reasoning Competencies: a Case of Preservice Teacher Education, “Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education” 2019, vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 446–464.	pl_PL
dc.references	Krajewski K., Prawa nauki. Przegląd zagadnień metodologicznych i filozoficznych, Wydawnictwo Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1998.	pl_PL
dc.references	Leake D. B., Abduction, Experience and Goals: A Model of Everyday Abductive Explanation, “The Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Inteligence” 1995, no. 7, pp. 407–428.	pl_PL
dc.references	Mill J. S., System logiki dedukcyjnej i indukcyjnej, vol. 1, serie: Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii, PWN, Warszawa 1962.	pl_PL
dc.references	Minnameier G., Forms of abduction and an inferential taxonomy, [in:] L. Magnani, T. Bertolotti (eds), Handbook of model-based science, Springer, Berlin 2017, pp. 175–195.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nazarko J., Regionalny foresight gospodarczy. Metodologia i instrumentarium badawcze, Związek Pracodawców Warszawy i Mazowsza, Warszawa 2013.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nazarko Ł., Responsible Research and Innovation – a Conceptual Contribution to Theory and Practice of Technology Management, “Business: Theory and Practice” 2019, no. 20, pp. 342–351.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nelson A., Descartes on the limited usefulness of mathematics, “Synthese” 2019, vol. 196, issue 9, pp. 3483–3504.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nowak S., Metodologia badań społecznych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2007.	pl_PL
dc.references	Paavola S., Fibers of Abduction, [in:] T. Thellefsen, B. Sorensen (eds), Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition, Walther de Gruyter, Berlin 2014, pp. 365–372.	pl_PL
dc.references	Popper K., Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London 2002.	pl_PL
dc.references	Siderska J., Jadaa K. S., Cloud manufacturing: a service-oriented manufacturing paradigm. A review paper, “Engineering Management in Production and Services” 2018, vol. 10(1), pp. 22–31.	pl_PL
dc.references	Stachak S., Podstawy metodologii nauk ekonomicznych, Difin, Warszawa 2013.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sułkowski Ł, Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2012.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sułkowski Ł., Paradygmaty i teorie w naukach o zarządzaniu, [in:] W. Czakon (ed.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2013, pp. 268–290.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tammik V., Appraisal of Research Depends Upon its Conceptualization, “Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science” 2014, vol. 48, issue 4, pp. 384–392.	pl_PL
dc.references	Thagard P., Computational Philosophy Science, MIT Press, Cambridge 1998.	pl_PL
dc.references	Urbański M., Paula Thagarda konepcja rozumowania, “Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofii Umysłu” 2012, vol. 6(1), pp. 97–120.	pl_PL
dc.references	Vanharanta H., Markopoulos E., Visualization of the Wisdom Cube Scientific Knowledge Space for Management and Leadership, “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” 2020, vol. 961, pp. 14–25.	pl_PL
dc.references	Vitti Rodrigues M., Emmeche C., Abduction and styles of scientific thinking, “Synthese” 2019, https://www.cle.unicamp.br/index.php/sites/default/files/2019_MVR_CE_Styles_Abd.pdf (accessed: 6.05.2019).	pl_PL
dc.references	Ziembiński Z., Logika praktyczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-333-2.07