Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFerrante, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T08:43:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T08:43:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29955
dc.description.abstractWhat happens when people of different cultures, values, religion live together? Sociological studies on immigrative phenomenon often swing between immigration and integration policies. These policies actually reveal the difficulty of the host society to institutionalize new models of social differences accompanying multiculturalism. Immigrants who “arrive” continue their life in a place where they do not passively participate in the passing of time, but become actors. Pressed by the hegemonic culture of the host society to adapt, do not cease to practice their religious and origin cultural expressions, often in conditions of urban spatial and social marginalization, they resist assimilation with ethnic persistence strategies. Considering the impact of religion and origin cultural values on expression of differences, it is important to consider their role in the integration process. And, above all—facilitate or hinder integration? These dynamics have been analyzed in a research study on immigrants’ integration process in Palermo. The main results are presented in this paper. In this case study, the research’s data hypothesizes a theoretical model of integration in which immigrants, free to express their religious and cultural differences, tend to reduce their perception of minorityen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review; 3
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectIntegrationen_GB
dc.subjectReligionen_GB
dc.subjectIdentityen_GB
dc.subjectMulticulturalismen_GB
dc.subjectAdaptationen_GB
dc.subjectAssimilationen_GB
dc.titleReligion and Culture of Origin. Re-Shaping Identity in the Integration Process: A Case Study in Sicilyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number126-147
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Palermo, Italy
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteLorenzo Ferrante is a Professor of Sociology at the Department of Political Sciences and International Relations, University of Palermo, Italy. His research interests lie in biographical paths and discontinuities, multiculturalism, newcomers, and social distance. He has dealt—at both theoretical and empirical levels and through quantitative and qualitative research—with trends of the dynamics of identity and biographical paths in Western societies. Based on this research, carried out within both national and local academic projects, he has published monographs, research reports, and articles in national book collections, as well as national and international journals.en_GB
dc.referencesAlba, Richard and Victor Nee. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review 31(4):826-874.en_GB
dc.referencesAmbrosini, Maurizio. 2007. Isole: minoranze migranti, globalizzazione a cura di Mario G., vol 2. Palermo: Fondazione Ignazio Buttitta.en_GB
dc.referencesAmbrosini, Maurizio. 2014. Non passa lo straniero? Le politiche migratorie tra sovranità nazionale e diritti umani. Assisi: Cittadella.en_GB
dc.referencesAppadurai, Arjun. 2001. Modernità in polvere. Rome: Meltemi.en_GB
dc.referencesBirt, Jonathan. 2009. “Islamophobia in the Construction of British Muslim Identity Politics.” Pp. 210-227 in Muslims in Britain. Race, Place, and Identities, edited by P. Hopkins and R. Gale. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBourdieu, Pierre. 1983. La distinzione. Critica sociale del gusto. Bologna: Il Mulino.en_GB
dc.referencesBruce, Steve. 1992. Religion and Modernisation: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularisation Thesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesChrist, Stephen. 2016. “Matachines in the Midwest: Religion and Identity in the American Heartland.” Qualitative Sociology Review 12(2):44-59.en_GB
dc.referencesCochran, Clarke E. 1998. “Introduction.” Pp. ix-xix in A Wall of Separation? Debating the Public Role of Religion, edited by M Serges, Ted G. Jelene, and C. E. Cochran. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.en_GB
dc.referencesCole, Jeffrey and Sally Booth. 2006. “Domestic Work, Family Life, and Immigration in Sicily.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 11(1):22-36.en_GB
dc.referencesDe La Garza, Antonio T. and Kent Ono A. 2015. “Retheorizing Adaptation: Differential Adaptation and Critical Intercultural Communication.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 8(4):69-289.en_GB
dc.referencesFerrante, Lorenzo. 2011. “New Comers, Confidence and Social Fragmentation in Communities with Strong Cultural Differentiation in Sicily.” International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 2(9):199-203.en_GB
dc.referencesGans, Herbert J. 1992. “Comment: Ethnic Invention and Acculturation, a Bumpy-Line Approach.” Journal of American Ethnic History 11(1):42-52.en_GB
dc.referencesGlaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1971. Status Passage. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.en_GB
dc.referencesGlaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1974. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.en_GB
dc.referencesGordis, David M. and Yoav Ben-Horin. 1991. Jewish Identity in America. Los Angeles, CA: Susan and David Wilstein Institute of Jewish Policy Studies.en_GB
dc.referencesGordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHagan, Jacqueline and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2003. “Calling Upon the Sacred: Migrants’ Use of Religion in the Migration Process.” International Migration Review 37(4):1145-1162.en_GB
dc.referencesHirschman, Charles. 2004. “The Role of Religion in the Origin and Adaptation of Immigrant Groups in the United States.” International Migration Review 38(3):1206-1233.en_GB
dc.referencesLeege, David C. and Lyman A. Kellstedt, eds. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe.en_GB
dc.referencesLevitt, Peggy. 2003. “‘You Know, Abram Was Really the First Immigrant’: Religion and Transnational Migration.” International Migration Review 37(3):847-873.en_GB
dc.referencesLoch, Dietmar. 2009. “Immigrant Youth and Urban Riots: A Comparison of France and Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35:791-814.en_GB
dc.referencesMaréchal, Brigitte. 2003. Muslims in Enlarged Europe, Religion and Society. Leiden, Boston: Brill.en_GB
dc.referencesPenninx, Rinus and Marco Martiniello. 2007. “Processi di integrazione e politiche (locali): stato dell’arte e lezioni di policy.” Mondi Migranti 3:31-59.en_GB
dc.referencesPennix, Rinus, Nicholas Van Hear, and Dimitrina Spencer. 2008. “Migration and Integration in Europe: The State of Research.” Compas Report:1-18.en_GB
dc.referencesPortes, Alejandro. 1985. The Economic Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.en_GB
dc.referencesPortes, Alejandro and Josh DeWind. 2004. “A Cross‐Atlantic Dialogue: The Progress of Research and Theory in the Study of International Migration.” International Migration Review 38(3):828-1302.en_GB
dc.referencesPortes, Alejandro and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies. The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foudation.en_GB
dc.referencesPortes, Alejandro and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2014. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_GB
dc.referencesPortes, Alejandro and Min Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530:74-96.en_GB
dc.referencesSeidler, John. 1986. “Contested Accomodation: The Catholic Church as a Special Case of Social Change.” Social Forces 64(4):847-874.en_GB
dc.referencesSmith, Anthony Douglas. 1998. Le origini etniche delle nazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.en_GB
dc.referencesVertovec, Steven and Susanne Wessendorf. 2010. The Multiculturalism Backlash. London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesYang, Fenggang and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2001. “Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications.” American Sociological Review 66:269-288.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmaillorenzo.ferrante@unipa.it
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.07
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.