Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrohman, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-04T11:32:03Z
dc.date.available2019-04-04T11:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2450-4491
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/27422
dc.description.abstractThe wave of changes in teaching approaches due to the introduction of the 21 century skills – including creativity and problem solving – has affected not only K through 12 classrooms, but also colleges and universities. Thompson (2014) suggests that when designing courses and curricula college educators should consider not only the content knowledge, skills and dispositions their students need to learn, but also what capacities ought to be developed and through what type of pedagogies. In this article, I propose that pedagogies of engagement are developed and used to teach content and skills in a college level course on Psychology of Creativity. In the main section of the article, I present three groups of creative assignments developed in collaboration with Dr. Heather Snyder: journal activities, creative project assignments, and creative problem-solving workshops. I argue that these assignments not only affect students’ motivation, engagement, and deep learning, but they also facilitate the development of mini-c and little-c creativity.en_GB
dc.description.abstractPrzemiany w pedagogice wywołane wprowadzeniem tak zwanych umiejętności XXI wieku wywarły wpływ na nauczanie na poziomie od podstawowego po wyższe. Zgodnie z tym, co pisze Thompson (2014), nauczyciele akademiccy planujący kursy i programy nauczania powinni odpowiednio dostosować podejście metodyczne, aby takie umiejętności skutecznie rozwijać. W niniejszym artykule proponuję, aby do nauczania wiedzy i umiejętności z zakresu psychologii twórczości wykorzystać podejście zwane pedagogiką zaangażowania (por. z kształceniem podmiotowym, Stasiak 2005). Celem tego podejścia jest rozwój umiejętności twórczych oraz umiejętności skutecznego i głębokiego uczenia się poprzez zaangażowanie, rozwijanie motywacji oraz tworzenie. Główna część artykułu poświęcona jest opisowi trzech grup zadań zaprojektowanych na potrzeby kursu Psychologia Twórczości, przy współpracy Dr Heather Snyder. Zadania te obejmują prowadzenie dziennika, zadania związane z twórczym projektem oraz warsztaty twórczego rozwiązywania problemów. W dalszej części artykułu staram się pokazać, że te zadania – odpowiadające założeniom pedagogiki zaangażowania – nie tylko ułatwiają przyswajanie wiedzy i umiejętności akademickich, ale przede wszystkim rozwijają kreatywność na poziomie płynnym i skrystalizowanym.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne; 2
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectcreativityen_GB
dc.subjectmini-cen_GB
dc.subjectlittle-cen_GB
dc.subjecteducationen_GB
dc.subjectexperiential learningen_GB
dc.subjectpedagogyen_GB
dc.subjectkreatywnośćpl_PL
dc.subjectmini-cpl_PL
dc.subjectlittle-cpl_PL
dc.subjectedukacjapl_PL
dc.subjectnauczaniepl_PL
dc.subjectuczenie przez doświadczeniepl_PL
dc.titleTeaching for Creativity: Mini-c, Little-c and Experiential Learning in College Classroomen_GB
dc.title.alternativeNauczanie dla twórczości: Rozwijanie kreatywności poprzez doświadczenie w tworzeniu wśród studentów psychologii i innych kierunkówpl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number106-132
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationThe University of Texas at Dallas, Center for Values in Medicine, Science, and Technology
dc.referencesAssociation of American Colleges and Universities (2013, April) It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success, http://www.aacu.org/leap/public_opinion_research.cfmpl_PL
dc.referencesBeghetto R. A. (2006) Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students, “Creativity Reasearch Journal”, 18: 447–457.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeghetto R. A., Kaufman J. C. (2010) Broadening conceptions of creativity in the classroom in: Nurturing creativity in the classroom, R. A. Beghetto, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), Cambridge University Press: 191–205.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarkenord D. M. (1994) Promoting human factors psychology thinking through designassignments, “Teaching of Psychology”, 21: 235–237.pl_PL
dc.referencesCisero C. A. (2006) Does reflective journal writing improve course performance?, “CollegeTeaching”, 54: 231–236.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnor-Greene P. A. (2000) Making connections: Evaluating the effectiveness of journal writing in enhancing student learning, “Teaching of Psychology”, 27: 44–46.pl_PL
dc.referencesConnor-Greene P. A., Young A., Paul C., Murdoch J. W. (2005) Poetry: It’s not just for English class anymore, “Teaching of Psychology”, 32: 215–221.pl_PL
dc.referencesCraft A. (2011) Creativity and education futures. Learning in a Digital Age, Sterling, Trentham.pl_PL
dc.referencesDewey J. (1933 [1998]) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.pl_PL
dc.referencesDewey J. (1938) Experience and education, Kappa Delta Pi.pl_PL
dc.referencesDomino G., Wechter V. T. (1976) Joint teaching of undergraduate courses in creativity, “Teaching of Psychology”, 3: 123–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesEdgerton R. (1997) Education white paper, Unpublished report for the Pew Charitable Trust.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarson Jr. A., Pianta R. C. (2017, September) Colleges need to be much more innovative with their curricula, https://www.insidehighered.compl_PL
dc.referencesGrigorenko E. L., Jarvin L., Tan M., Sternberg R. J. (2008) Something new in the garden: Assessing creativity in academic domains, “Psychology Science Quarterly”, 50: 295–307.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrohman M. G., Szmidt K. J. (2013) Teaching for creativity: How to shape creative attitudes and skills in students and teachers in: Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity, M. B. Gregorson, H. T. Snyder, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company: 16–36.pl_PL
dc.referencesHodges L. C. (2015) Teaching undergraduate science: A guide overcoming obstacles to student learning, Starling, VA: Sylus Publishing, LLC.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoward J. R. (2015) Discussion in the college classroom. Getting your students engaged and participating in person and online, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuston T. (2009) Teaching what you don’t know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesItin C. M. (Fall, 1999) Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century, “The Journal of Experiential Education”, 22: 91–98.pl_PL
dc.referencesIsaksen S. G., Dorval K. B., Treffinger D. J. (2011) Creative approaches to problem solving. A framework for innovation and change (3rd Edition), SAGE Publications, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesJeffrey B., Craft A. (2004) Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships, “Educational Studies”, 30 (1): 77–87.pl_PL
dc.referencesKaufman J. C., Beghetto R. A. (2009) Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity, “Review of General Psychology”, 13: 1–12.pl_PL
dc.referencesLang J. M. (2016) Small teaching. Everyday lessons from the science of learning, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand.pl_PL
dc.referencesMalouff J. M., Hall L., Schutte N. S., Rooke S. E. (2010) Use of motivational teaching techniques and psychology student satisfaction, “Psychology Learning & Teaching”, 9: 39–44.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller S. (1997) Self-knowledge as an outcome of application journal keeping in socialpsychology, “Teaching of Psychology”, 24: 124–125.pl_PL
dc.referencesMills R. (2008) ʻIt’s just a nuisance’: Improving college student reflective journal writing, “College Student Journal”, 42: 684–690.pl_PL
dc.referencesNęcka E. (2001) Psychologia Twórczości, Gdańsk, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.pl_PL
dc.referencesPartnership for 21 Century Skills (2008), http://www.p21.org Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., Perry R. P. (2002) Academic emotions in students’ selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research, “Educational Psychologist”, 37: 91–106.pl_PL
dc.referencesSawyer R. K. (2010) Learning for creativity in: Nurturing creativity in the classroom, R. A. Beghetto, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), Cambridge University Press: 172–190.pl_PL
dc.referencesSawyer R. K. (2012) Explaining Creativity. The Science of Innovation, (2nd edition), Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSawyer K. (2013) Zig Zag: The surprising path to greater creativity, CA: Jossey-Bass.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchneider C. G. (2009) Practicing liberal education: Formative themes in the reinvention of liberal learning, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.pl_PL
dc.referencesScott G., Leritz L., Mumford M. (2004) The effectiveness of creativity in training, A quantitative Review, “Creativity Research Journal”, 16: 261–388.pl_PL
dc.referencesSnyder H. T., Grohman M. G., Tomlinson M., Payette R. (2012, April) Creative selfefficacy and the creative project, Paper presented at APA Annual Convention. Orlando, FL.pl_PL
dc.referencesSnyder H. T. (2013) Designing creative assignments: Example of journal assignments and a creative project in: Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity, M. B. Gregerson, H. T. Snyder, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), NY: Springer Science + Business Media: 163–173.pl_PL
dc.referencesStasiak M. K. (2005) Prawo studenta Wyższej Szkoły Humanistyczno-Ekonomicznej w Łodzi do dodatkowej wolności in: Trening twórczości w szkole wyższej, K. J. Szmidt (red.), Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi: 59–80.pl_PL
dc.referencesSternberg R. J., Dess N. K. (eds. Special Section) (2001) Creativity, “American Psychologist”, 56 (4): 332–362.pl_PL
dc.referencesTatarkiewicz W. (1982), Dzieje sześciu pojęć, Wrocław, Ossolineum.pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson Jr. R. J. (2014) Beyond reason and tolerance: The purporse of higher education, Oxford, Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTowsend E. (2018) Journal Entry #10. Psychology of Creativity, PSY3355, UT Dallas, April 30.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2016, January), The future of jobs, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs; (20.03.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesYoder J. D., Hochevar C. M. (2005) Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations, “Teaching of Psychology”, 32 (2): 91–95.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmggrohman@utdallas.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2450-4491.07.06
dc.relation.volume7en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.