dc.contributor.author | Podrez, Ewa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-26T13:18:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-26T13:18:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1899-2226 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/26895 | |
dc.description.abstract | The conception of an act and its evaluation constitute the most interesting and important moral subject which consists of a complex set of theoretical and practical issues. The article includes St. Thomas’ conception of the definition of the goodness of an act, Tatarkiewicz’s theory of rightness of an act as a source of its evaluation as well as Kotarbinski’s considerations which deal with the analysis of an act from an efficiency perspective. They have all contributed to the definitione of an act in its several variants and provided the possibility of classification of evaluation of an act on the ethical and praxeological plane. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Publication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Annales. Ethics in Economic Life;7 | |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | en_GB |
dc.subject | goodness | en_GB |
dc.subject | rightness | en_GB |
dc.subject | efficiency | en_GB |
dc.title | The ethical and praxeological conceptions of an act and its evaluation | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.page.number | 39-49 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Christian Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2353-4869 | |
dc.references | Drabarek, A. (2004). Czyn i jego ocena moralna w poglądach etyków ze szkoły lwowskowarszawskiej. Annales. Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 39(2), 31–49. | en_GB |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1785/1997). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. | en_GB |
dc.references | Kotarbiński, T. (1938). O istocie i zadaniach metodologii ogólnej (prakseologii). Przegląd Filozoficzny, 1. | en_GB |
dc.references | Kotarbiński, T. (1972). Traktat o dobrej robocie (7th Ed.). Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna. | en_GB |
dc.references | Kotarbiński, T. (1999). Cel czynu a zadanie wykonawcy. In Dzieła wszystkie – Prakseologia (Vol. 1). Warszawa: Ossolineum. | en_GB |
dc.references | Spaemann, R. (1997). Szczęście a życzliwość. Esej o etyce (J. Merecki SDS, Trans.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego. | en_GB |
dc.references | Szostek MIC, A. (1980). Normy i wyjątki. Filozoficzne aspekty dyskusji wokół norm ogólnie ważnych we współczesnej teologii. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego. | en_GB |
dc.references | Tatarkiewicz, W. (1971). O bezwzględności dobra. In Droga do filozofii i inne rozprawy filozoficzne. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. | en_GB |
dc.references | Tugendhat, E. (2004). Wykłady o etyce (J. Sidorek, Trans.). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa. | en_GB |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | ewapodrez@wp.pl | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1899-2226.20.7.03 | |
dc.relation.volume | 20 | en_GB |
dc.subject.jel | A13 | |