Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPodrez, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T13:18:22Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T13:18:22Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/26895
dc.description.abstractThe conception of an act and its evaluation constitute the most interesting and important moral subject which consists of a complex set of theoretical and practical issues. The article includes St. Thomas’ conception of the definition of the goodness of an act, Tatarkiewicz’s theory of rightness of an act as a source of its evaluation as well as Kotarbinski’s considerations which deal with the analysis of an act from an efficiency perspective. They have all contributed to the definitione of an act in its several variants and provided the possibility of classification of evaluation of an act on the ethical and praxeological plane.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Ethics in Economic Life;7
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectgoodnessen_GB
dc.subjectrightnessen_GB
dc.subjectefficiencyen_GB
dc.titleThe ethical and praxeological conceptions of an act and its evaluationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number39-49
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Christian Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesDrabarek, A. (2004). Czyn i jego ocena moralna w poglądach etyków ze szkoły lwowskowarszawskiej. Annales. Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 39(2), 31–49.en_GB
dc.referencesKant, I. (1785/1997). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKotarbiński, T. (1938). O istocie i zadaniach metodologii ogólnej (prakseologii). Przegląd Filozoficzny, 1.en_GB
dc.referencesKotarbiński, T. (1972). Traktat o dobrej robocie (7th Ed.). Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.en_GB
dc.referencesKotarbiński, T. (1999). Cel czynu a zadanie wykonawcy. In Dzieła wszystkie – Prakseologia (Vol. 1). Warszawa: Ossolineum.en_GB
dc.referencesSpaemann, R. (1997). Szczęście a życzliwość. Esej o etyce (J. Merecki SDS, Trans.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.en_GB
dc.referencesSzostek MIC, A. (1980). Normy i wyjątki. Filozoficzne aspekty dyskusji wokół norm ogólnie ważnych we współczesnej teologii. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.en_GB
dc.referencesTatarkiewicz, W. (1971). O bezwzględności dobra. In Droga do filozofii i inne rozprawy filozoficzne. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en_GB
dc.referencesTugendhat, E. (2004). Wykłady o etyce (J. Sidorek, Trans.). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailewapodrez@wp.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.20.7.03
dc.relation.volume20en_GB
dc.subject.jelA13


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.