Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorRutkowska, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T12:18:32Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T12:18:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24736
dc.description.abstractHumansare not able to change their nature other than through their own actions and with the participation of others. The full development of personal life can therefore only be achieved in society. Managing the available resources, through his activity, man delineates the boundaries between the private, the individual, and the public spheres. The decisive factor in the right to private property is the individual’s own work. In economic theory, public goods are a manifestation of market failure, as market mechanisms for regulating supply and demand do not apply to the market for the quantity of goods supplied to the market. The theory of public goods is therefore primarily the subject of economic research and analysis, and the idea of the common good is the domain of philosophical reflection, especially of political philosophy. Considering the dynamic progress of civilization and the associated process of exploiting the natural environment in human economic activity, the policy of proper use of natural resources, taking into account the respect for the common good of the general public, is increasingly important. The answer to the challenges of the present day is the theory of sustainable development developed, in particular, in the green economy. It is considered to be a socio‑philosophical idea, the direction of economic development, as well as the direction of scientific research, and it comprehensively deals with the problem of the long‑term ability of the modern economy to develop upon the criterion of intergenerational justice. The article addresses issues of public goods theory and sustainable development in the context of Locke’s philosophical thought. The emancipation of Locke’s philosophical achievements manifests itself not only in the sphere of political philosophy, but also in the socio‑economic context, forming the skeleton of modern democratic states. Locke’s reflections, especially in the Two Treaties on Government, are an endorsement of individualism, economic freedom and economic liberalism, as well as the idea of a natural environment in the context of economic human activity. The practical realization of the common good in social, political and economic life suffers many difficulties in the conditions of the globalized world. Hence, interdisciplinary and deeper reflection on the real good perceived both by the individual and by the community is necessary. It also seems reasonable to discuss the ways of perceiving the common good and the public interest of present and future generations.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe “Annales. Ethics in Economic Life” is affiliated and co-financed by the Faculty of Economics and Sociology of the University of Lodz.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym;1
dc.subjectpublic goodsen_GB
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten_GB
dc.subjecteconomic liberalismen_GB
dc.subjectJ. Lockeen_GB
dc.titleTeorie dóbr publicznych i zrównoważonego rozwoju w myśli filozoficznej Johna Locke’apl_PL
dc.title.alternativeTheories of Public Goods and Sustainable Development in the Philosophical Thought of John Lockeen_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2018; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2018pl_PL
dc.page.number[57]-68
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4896
dc.referencesBrol M., Globalne dobra publiczne, „Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu” 2008, nr 1191.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeneulin S., N. Townsend, Public Goods, Global Public Goods and Common Goods, WeD Working Paper 18, University of Bath, Bath 2006.pl_PL
dc.referencesFoldvary F., Public Goods and Private Communities: The Market Provision of Social Services, Edward Elgar, Aldershot 1994.pl_PL
dc.referencesHobbes T., Lewiatan, czyli materia, forma i władza państwa kościelnego i świeckiego, przeł. Cz. Znamierowski, PWN, Warszawa 1954.pl_PL
dc.referencesKargol‑Wasiluk A., Teoria dóbr publicznych a paradygmat ekonomii sektora publicznego, „Zarządzanie Publiczne” 2008, nr 3, s. 91–117.pl_PL
dc.referencesKiełczewski D., Konsumpcja a perspektywy trwałego i zrównoważonego rozwoju, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok 2004.pl_PL
dc.referencesKleer J., Identyfikacja rodzajów dóbr wytwarzanych przez sektor publiczny [w:] Sektor publiczny w Polsce i na świecie. Między upadkiem a rozkwitem, red. Kleer J., CeDeWu, Warszawa 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesKról M., Historia myśli politycznej. Od Machiavellego po czasy współczesne, Arche, Gdańsk 2001.pl_PL
dc.referencesLocke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, tłum. Z. Rau, PWN, Warszawa 1992.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatwiejczuk R., Zarządzanie marketingowo‑logistyczne. Wartość i efektywność, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2006.pl_PL
dc.referencesMirońska D., Zachowania nabywców na rynku – trendy i wpływ na działanie przedsiębiorstw, „International Journal of Management and Economics” 2010, Vol. 27, s. 114–132.pl_PL
dc.referencesPearce D.W., R.K. Turner, Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 1990.pl_PL
dc.referencesPopkin R.H., A. Stroll, Filozofia, tłum. J. Karłowski, N. Leśniewski, A. Przyłębski, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S‑ka, Poznań 1994.pl_PL
dc.referencesProviding Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization, red. I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, R.U. Mendoza, Oxford University Press, New York 2003.pl_PL
dc.referencesRawls J., Wykłady z historii filozofii polityki, tłum. S. Szymański, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa 2010.pl_PL
dc.referencesRostek A., T. Zalega, Konsumpcja kolaboratywna wśród młodych polskich i amerykańskich konsumentów (cz. 1), „Marketing i Rynek” 2015, nr 5.pl_PL
dc.referencesSamuelson P. A., The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, “Review of Economics and Statistic” 1954, Vol. 36, nr 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesStiglitz J.E., Ekonomia sektora publicznego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2007.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzahaj A., M.N. Jakubowski, Filozofia polityki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesSztompka P., Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków 2002.pl_PL
dc.referencesŚwiatowa Strategia Ochrony Przyrody. Ochrona Żywych Zasobów dla Trwałego Rozwoju, IUCN, UNEP, WWF, Liga Ochrony Przyrody, Warszawa 1985.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeimer D.L., A.R. Vining, Policy Analysis, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1999.pl_PL
dc.referencesZalega T., Nowe trendy i makrotrendy w zachowaniach konsumenckich gospodarstw domowych w XXI wieku, „Konsumpcja i Rozwój” 2013, nr 2 (5).pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailanna.rutkowska@uwm.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.21.1.05
dc.relation.volume21pl_PL
dc.subject.jelB11
dc.subject.jelH41
dc.subject.jelP16
dc.subject.jelQ57


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord