Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWajszczyk, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T12:18:34Z
dc.date.available2017-03-30T12:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21066
dc.description.abstractVarious scholars of ethics and economics conduct research on the best modes of decision making which guarantee good outcome and moral behaviour of the individuals involved. Either of the modes considered, rules with regulations or discretion and judgment, find applicability in diversified professional circumstances. The paper investigates how discretion can be used in professional activity by using the Aristotelic-Thomistic framework. Results indicate that such a framework can be used by engineers in their working environments and by other working professionals with the main proposition that only in discretionary decision making is the person able to take full responsibility for the outcomes and to premeditate their moral worth in conscience before resolving to commit the act itself.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.subjectpersonalistic professionalism in engineering ethicsen_GB
dc.subjectdiscretionen_GB
dc.subjecthuman decision makingen_GB
dc.subjectconscienceen_GB
dc.subjecttruthen_GB
dc.titleThe Role of Discretion in Professional Practiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[113]-121
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationŁódź University of Technology
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4896
dc.referencesAngelis J., G. Parry, M. Macintyre, Discretion and Complexity in Customer Focused Environments, “European Management Journal” 2012, Vol. 30, pp. 466–472.en_GB
dc.referencesAragón-Correa J.A., F. Matías-Reche, M.E. Senise-Barrio, Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment, “Journal of Business Research” 2004, Vol. 57, pp. 964–975.en_GB
dc.referencesArnaud S., D.M. Wasieleski, Corporate Humanistic Responsibility: Social Performance through Managerial Discretion of the HRM, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2014, Vol. 120, pp. 313–334.en_GB
dc.referencesBowen T.R., D.M. Kreps, A. Skrzypacz, Rules with Discretion and Local Information, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” 2013, pp. 1273–1320.en_GB
dc.referencesCooter R.D., T. Ginsburg, Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models, “International Review of Law and Economics” 1996, Vol. 16, pp. 295–313.en_GB
dc.referencesDavis M., A Plea for Judgment, “Science and Engineering Ethics” 2012, Vol. 18, pp. 789–808.en_GB
dc.referencesEinat T., Sentencing rationales, judicial discretion, and the practice of criminal fines in Israel, “Journal of Criminal Justice” 2008, Vol. 36, pp. 444–452, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.07.007.en_GB
dc.referencesHunt G., The Human Condition of the Professional: Discretion and Accountability, “Nursing Ethics” 1997, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 519–526.en_GB
dc.referencesHutzschenreuter T., I. Kleindienst, (How) Does discretion change over time? A contribution toward a dynamic view of managerial discretion, “Scandinavian Journal of Management” 2013, Vol. 29, pp. 264–281.en_GB
dc.referencesKunreuther H., M. Pauly, Rules Rather Than Discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina,“Journal of Risk and Uncertainty” 2006, Vol. 33, pp. 101–116.en_GB
dc.referencesMelé D., Ethical Education in Accounting: Integrating Rules, Values and Virtues, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2005, Vol. 57, pp. 97–109.en_GB
dc.referencesMerriam-Webster Dictionary (2000).en_GB
dc.referencesNaveh E., Formality and discretion in successful RD projects, “Journal of Operations Management” 2007, Vol. 25, pp. 110–125.en_GB
dc.referencesRoychowdhury S., X. Martin, Understanding Discretion in Conservatism: An Alternative Viewpoint, “Journal of Accounting and Economics” 2013, Vol. 56, pp. 134–146.en_GB
dc.referencesSahaym A., L.J. Treviño, H.K. Steensma, The influence of managerial discretion, innovation and uncertainty on export intensity: A real options perspective, “International Business Review” 2012, Vol. 21, pp. 1131–1147.en_GB
dc.referencesSt. T. Aquinas, Summa Theologica Literally Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Burns, Oates Washbourne, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago 1922.en_GB
dc.referencesWajszczyk P., Discretion in professional practice and in engineering ethics, “Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym” 2015, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 129–136.en_GB
dc.referencesWaldron T.L., S.D. Graffin, J.F. Porac, J.B. Wade, Third-party Endorsements of CEO Quality, Managerial Discretion, and Stakeholder Reactions, “Journal of Business Research” 2013, Vol. 66, pp. 2592–2599.en_GB
dc.referencesYan Y., Ch.Ch. Yan, S. Mak, An Exploration of Managerial Discretion and Its Impact on Firm Performance: Task Autonomy, Contractual Control, and Compensation, “International Business Review” 2010, Vol. 19, pp. 521–530.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.19.4.08
dc.relation.volume19en_GB
dc.subject.jelA13
dc.subject.jelD81


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record