Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBojarska, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorKowalczyk, Wiktoria
dc.contributor.authorDusza, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Wojciech M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-24T09:55:42Z
dc.date.available2026-02-24T09:55:42Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-31
dc.identifier.issn2082-4440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/57510
dc.description.abstractAim: This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the gender pay gap (GPG) in Poland, examined within the national, European, and global contexts. It explores key causes, sectoral disparities, and the broader economic and policy implications. Particular emphasis is placed on the adjusted gender pay gap (GPG), which provides a more accurate measure by controlling for variables such as education, experience, and job position. This method reveals deeper and more persistent wage disparities than those suggested by the unadjusted GPG.Methodology/Data sources: The study adopts a narrative literature review approach supported by secondary data analysis. It draws upon a wide range of national and international data sources, including Eurostat, Poland’s Central Statistical Office (GUS), OECD, and various EU and global reports published between 2015 and 2025.Findings: In 2023, the unadjusted GPG in the EU was 12%, while in Poland it stood at 7.8%. Despite appearing relatively low, Poland’s GPG has stagnated or worsened over the past decade, while the EU has seen a gradual decline. The adjusted GPG – reflecting education, experience, and job type – was 11.4% for the EU and 12.5% for Poland (as of 2018). Sectoral differences in Poland are striking: 24.8% in information and communication and 27.6% in finance and insurance. Misinterpretation of unadjusted vs. adjusted data may distort the public debate and policy response.Conclusions: The GPG remains a persistent challenge in both the EU and Poland. The lack of clarity between adjusted and unadjusted measures risks underestimating systemic inequality. Effective implementation of recent EU regulations, such as the Pay Transparency and Work-Life Balance Directives, will be key to narrowing the gap.Significance/Originality: This is, to our knowledge, the first holistic synthesis of various GPG indicators for Poland, presented alongside EU and global comparisons. The findings underscore the importance of integrated, data-informed policies to advance gender equality as a cornerstone of sustainable development.en
dc.description.abstractCel: W artykule przedstawiamy kompleksową analizę luki płacowej ze względu na płeć (GPG) w Polsce, uwzględniając kontekst krajowy, europejski i globalny. Omawiamy główne przyczyny, różnice sektorowe oraz szersze konsekwencje gospodarcze i społeczne. Szczególny nacisk kładziemy na skorygowaną lukę płacową ze względu na płeć (adjusted GPG), która stanowi dokładniejszy miernik, ponieważ uwzględnia zmienne takie jak wykształcenie, doświadczenie zawodowe oraz zajmowane stanowisko. Metoda ta ujawnia głębsze i trwalsze nierówności płacowe niż te wskazywane przez nieskorygowaną lukę płacową (unadjusted GPG).Metodologia/Źródła danych: Badanie ma charakter narracyjnego przeglądu literatury, wspartego analizą danych wtórnych. Wykorzystaliśmy szeroki zakres źródeł krajowych i międzynarodowych, m.in. Eurostat, GUS, OECD oraz raporty UE i organizacji globalnych z lat 2015–2025.Główne wyniki: W 2023 r. niezrównana (niekorygowana) luka płacowa w UE wynosiła 12%, a w Polsce 7,8%. Choć ten wynik wydaje się korzystny, GPG w Polsce nie ulega poprawie od dekady, w przeciwieństwie do trendów unijnych. Skorygowana GPG (uwzględniająca m.in. wykształcenie, doświadczenie i stanowisko) wynosiła 11,4% w UE i 12,5% w Polsce (dane z 2018 r.). W niektórych sektorach w Polsce różnice są znacznie wyższe: np. 24,8% w sektorze informacji i komunikacji czy 27,6% w finansach. Niezrozumienie różnicy między danymi korygowanymi i niekorygowanymi może prowadzić do błędnych wniosków.Wnioski: Luka płacowa nadal stanowi poważne wyzwanie – zarówno w Polsce, jak i w UE. Klarowne rozróżnienie między metodami pomiaru (GPG skorygowana vs. niekorygowana) jest kluczowe dla skutecznych działań. Nowe regulacje UE, jeśli zostaną właściwie wdrożone, mogą pomóc w zmniejszeniu GPG.Znaczenie/Oryginalność: To, według naszej wiedzy, pierwsza tak kompleksowa synteza różnych wskaźników GPG dla Polski w porównaniu z kontekstem unijnym i globalnym. Wyniki podkreślają potrzebę zintegrowanych, opartych na dokładnych danych działań na rzecz równości płci jako warunku zrównoważonego rozwoju.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEkonomia Międzynarodowa;50pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectgender pay gapen
dc.subjectgender equalityen
dc.subjecteconomyen
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten
dc.subjectlabour marketen
dc.subjectlabor lawen
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectemployee life cycle perspectiveen
dc.subjectluka płacowa między kobietami a mężczyznamipl
dc.subjectrówność płcipl
dc.subjectzrównoważony rozwójpl
dc.subjectsztuczna inteligencjapl
dc.subjectperspektywa cyklu życia pracownikapl
dc.titleGender Pay Gap in European Economy System with Focus on Poland from Global Perspective: in the Pursuit of Sustainabilityen
dc.title.alternativeRóżnica w wynagrodzeniach kobiet i mężczyzn w europejskim systemie gospodarczym ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Polski z globalnej perspektywy: w dążeniu do zrównoważonego rozwojupl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number5-32
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBojarska, Joanna - Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of General and Ecological Chemistryen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKowalczyk, Wiktoria - Lodz University of Technology, Advanced Biobased and Bioinspired Materialsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDusza, Dominik - Lodz University of Technology, Advanced Biobased and Bioinspired Materialsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWolf, Wojciech M. - Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of General and Ecological Chemistryen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6005
dc.referencesAltonji J.G., Blank R.M. (1999), Race and gender in the labor market, [in:] O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labour Economics, vol. 3: 3143–3259, North-Holland, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30039-0.en
dc.referencesAnnual Report 2023–2024. (2024), World Economic Forum, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Annual_Report_2023_2024.pdf.en
dc.referencesArt. 11. (1979), UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (18 grudnia 1979).en
dc.referencesBiasi F., Sarsoon A. (2022), Flexible wages, bargaining, and the gender gap, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 137(1): 215–266, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab026.en
dc.referencesBlinder A.S. (1973), Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates, “Journal of Human Resources”, 8(4): 436–455, https://doi.org/10.2307/144855.en
dc.referencesBoll C., Rossen A., Wolf K. (2017), The EU gender earnings gap: Job segregation and working time as driving factors, “Journal of Economics and Statistics”, 237(5): 407–452, https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-0100.en
dc.referencesBukowski A., Chrostek A., Novokmet K., Skawiński J. (2024), Income inequality in the 21st century Poland, “INE PAN Working Paper Series”, Paper No. 58, https://inepan.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/working-paper-58.pdf.en
dc.referencesBuzmaniuk S. (2023, 6 marca), Gender parity in Europe: A – still imperfect – model in the world, Robert Schuman Foundation Newsletter, No. 1013, https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/questions-d-europe/659-gender-parity-in-europe-a-still-imperfect-model-in-the-world.en
dc.referencesC100 – Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100). (n.d.), International Labour Organization, https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORML-EXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312245:NO.en
dc.referencesCharmes J. (2019), The unpaid care work and the labour market: An analysis of time use data based on the latest World Compilation of Time-use Surveys, International Labour Organization, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---gender/documents/publication/wcms_732791.pdf.en
dc.referencesCukrowska-Torzewska M. (2019), Gender wage gap in the workplace: Does the age of the firm matter? IBS Working Paper, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680118825071.en
dc.referencesDe Castro Romero X., Barroso C., Rosa Santero-Sánchez J. (2023), Does gender equality in managerial positions improve the gender wage gap? Comparative evidence from Europe, “Economies”, 11: 301, https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11120301.en
dc.referencesDe Poli F., Maier T. (2024), Enforcing ‘equal pay for equal work’ in the EU: What would it take? “The Journal of Economic Inequality”, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-024-09654-5.en
dc.referencesDirective (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms, Official Journal of the European Union.en
dc.referencesDzwigoł-Barosz, M. (2024), The problem of the gender pay gap in Poland in the face of the challenges of today’s labour market, “Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology”, 206, https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.206.8.en
dc.referencesEurope Sustainable Development Report 2025. (2025), https://eu-dashboards.sdgindex.org/.en
dc.referencesFortin N.M., Lemieux T., Firpo S. (2011), Decomposition methods in economics, [in:] O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4: 1–102, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)00407-2.en
dc.referencesGallen Y. (2019), The effect of maternity leave extensions on firms and coworkers, Working Paper, https://harris.uchicago.edu/files/gallen_parentalleave_2019.pdf.en
dc.referencesGamage K., Kavetsos G., Mallisck W., Sevila B. (2023), Pay transparency intervention and the gender pay gap: Evidence from research-intensive universities in the UK, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12778.en
dc.referencesGoldin C. (2014), A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter, “American Economic Review”, 104: 1091–1119, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1091.en
dc.referencesGrabowska M., Czaczasty Ł., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., Bolesta K. (2020), Report on national case study: Poland, SGH Warsaw School of Economics.en
dc.referencesGrajek M. (2003), Gender pay gap in Poland, “Economics of Planning”, 36: 23–44, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECOP.0000005729.71467.38.en
dc.referencesGreselin F., Jędrzejczak A. (2020), Analyzing the gender gap in Poland and Italy, and by regions, “International Advances in Economic Research”, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-020-09810-3.en
dc.referencesHunt J. (2002), The transition in East Germany: When is a ten-point fall in the gender gap bad news? “Journal of Labor Economics”, 20(1): 148–169, https://doi.org/10.1086/323935.en
dc.referencesImbens G.W. (2015), Matching methods in practice: Three examples, “Journal of Human Resources”, 50: 373–419, https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.373.en
dc.referencesImbens G.W., Rubin D.B. (2015), Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751.en
dc.referencesIwasaki T., Satogami K. (2023), Gender wage gap in European emerging markets: A meta-analytic perspective, “Journal for Labour Market Research”, 57: 9, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00333.en
dc.referencesLandmesser J.M. (2019), Decomposition of gender wage gap in Poland using counterfactual distribution with sample selection, “Statistics in Transition New Series”, 20(3): 171–186, https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2019-030.en
dc.referencesLeythienne O., Pérez-Julián M. (2021), Gender pay gaps in the European Union – a statistical analysis, Eurostat.en
dc.referencesLutz B. (2022), Gender equality and artificial intelligence in Europe: Addressing direct and indirect impacts of algorithms on gender-based discrimination, “ERA Forum”, 23: 33–52, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00709-6.en
dc.referencesMeara E., Pastore F., Webster M. (2020), The gender pay gap in the USA: A matching study, “Journal of Population Economics”, 33: 271–305, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00743-8.en
dc.referencesMincer J. (1974), Schooling and earnings, [in:] Schooling, Experience and Earnings, pp. 41–63, National Bureau of Economic Research.en
dc.referencesMincer J., Polachek S. (1977), An exchange: The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: Women’s earnings re-examined, “The Journal of Human Resources”, 13(1): 118–134, https://doi.org/10.2307/145305.en
dc.referencesMunarini M. (2022), New perspectives on the mitigation of gender bias in AI by EU regulations, “Peace Human Rights Governance”, 6(2): 111–136, https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-PHRG-2022-2-2.en
dc.referencesOaxaca R. (1973), Male–female wage differentials in urban labour markets, “International Economic Review”, 14(3): 693–709, https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981.en
dc.referencesOrazem P., Vodopivec M. (2000), Male–female differences in labor market outcomes during the early transition to market: The cases of Estonia and Slovenia, “Journal of Population Economics”, 13(2): 283–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050139.en
dc.referencesPizzinelli M., Panton R., Tavares P., Cazzaniga F., Li R. (2023), Labor market exposure to AI: Cross-country differences and distributional implications, International Monetary Fund, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400254802.001.en
dc.referencesRaffiotta E.C. (2024), Artificial intelligence and the protection of gender equality, “California Western International Law Journal”, 54(2): 489–516, https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwilj/vol54/iss2/5.en
dc.referencesReport of the Women’s Congress Association „Kobiety, rynek pracy i równość płac”. (2023), Warszawa, https://kongreskobiet.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/RAPORT.pdf.en
dc.referencesRoediger D. (2015), Slave emancipation and liberty for all, Verso.en
dc.referencesStatista. (n.d.), Gender pay gap in Poland from 2002 to 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1441436/poland-gender-pay-gap.en
dc.referencesStatistics Poland. (2025, 5 marca), Distribution of wages and salaries in the national economy in September 2024, https://stat.gov.pl/.en
dc.referencesThe gender gap at work is closing – but slowly. (2025, 7 marca), European Central Bank, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/2025/html/ecb.blog20250307~85fd774bd3.pl.html.en
dc.referencesThe gender pay gap: Definition and causes. (2023, 5 kwietnia), European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/pl/article/20200109STO69925/luka-placowa-miedzy-kobietami-a-mezczyznami-definicja-i-przyczyny.en
dc.referencesWomen in Work 2025. (2025), https://www.pwc.pl/pl/media/2025/polska-na-7-pozycji-women-in-work-index-ranking.html.en
dc.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2024), Global gender gap 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2024.pdf.en
dc.referencesZachorowska-Mazurkiewicz B., Gomółka P. (2023), Gender wage gap: Occupation and industries analysis for Poland, “Eastern Journal of European Studies”, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2023-0105.en
dc.referencesZając M., Bożykowski M., Chłoń-Domińczak A., Jasiński M. (2025), Gender pay gaps across STEM fields of study, “Studies in Higher Education”, 50(1): 126–139, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2330667.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailBojarska, Joanna - joanna.bojarska@p.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailKowalczyk, Wiktoria - 258324@edu.p.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailDusza, Dominik - dominik_dusza@outlook.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailWolf, Wojciech M. - wojciech.wolf@p.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2082-4440.50.01


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0