Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWojciechowski, Sergiusz
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-26T11:04:52Z
dc.date.available2026-01-26T11:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-31
dc.identifier.issn1427-9657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/57347
dc.description.abstractThe Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), established in 2001, plays a key role in shaping the political, economic and strategic order in Central and Eastern Asia. However, the outbreak of the war in Ukraine in 2022 exposed the organisation’s limitations arising from internal conflicts of interest among its members and its structural reliance on decision-making by consensus. This article examines the impact of the war in Ukraine on the SCO’s functioning – highlighting its institutional weaknesses, lack of a unified position and the growing power asymmetry between Russia and China. Special attention is paid to the responses of member states such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, India and Pakistan, and their attempts to balance cooperation with Russia against diversifying their international relations. The war in Ukraine has acted as a catalyst for shifts in the balance of power within the SCO, which may ultimately determine the organisation’s future as a platform for regional cooperation.en
dc.description.abstractSzanghajska Organizacja Współpracy (SOW), utworzona w 2001 r., odgrywa kluczową rolę w kształtowaniu porządku politycznego, gospodarczego i strategicznego w regionie Azji Centralnej oraz Wschodniej. Konflikt w Ukrainie w 2022 r. uwidocznił jednak ograniczenia organizacji wynikające z wewnętrznych sprzeczności interesów jej członków oraz strukturalnej zależności od konsensusu decyzyjnego. Artykuł analizuje wpływ wojny w Ukrainie na funkcjonowanie SOW, uwzględniając jej instytucjonalne słabości, brak wspólnego stanowiska oraz narastającą asymetrię sił między Rosją a Chinami. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono reakcjom państw członkowskich, takich jak Kazachstan, Uzbekistan, Indie i Pakistan, oraz ich próbom balansowania między współpracą z Rosją a dywersyfikacją relacji międzynarodowych. Wojna w Ukrainie stała się katalizatorem zmian w równowadze sił w ramach SOW, które mogą zadecydować o przyszłości tej organizacji jako platformy współpracy regionalnej.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEastern Review;2pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectSzanghajska Organizacja Współpracy (SOW)pl
dc.subjectwojna w Ukrainiepl
dc.subjectRosjapl
dc.subjectChinypl
dc.subjectKazachstanpl
dc.subjectUzbekistanpl
dc.subjectIndiepl
dc.subjectPakistanpl
dc.subjectBiałoruśpl
dc.subjectgeoekonomiapl
dc.subjectPas i Szlakpl
dc.subjectsuwerennośćpl
dc.subjectintegralność terytorialnapl
dc.subjectkonsensus decyzyjnypl
dc.subjectizolacja międzynarodowapl
dc.subjectwielobiegunowy porządek światowypl
dc.subjectdywersyfikacja relacji międzynarodowychpl
dc.subjectsankcjepl
dc.subjectShanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)en
dc.subjectwar in Ukraineen
dc.subjectRussiaen
dc.subjectChinaen
dc.subjectKazakhstanen
dc.subjectUzbekistanen
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectPakistanen
dc.subjectBelarusen
dc.subjectgeoeconomicsen
dc.subjectBelt and Roaden
dc.subjectsovereigntyen
dc.subjectterritorial integrityen
dc.subjectdecision-making consensusen
dc.subjectinternational isolationen
dc.subjectmultipolar world orderen
dc.subjectdiversification of international relationsen
dc.subjectsanctionsen
dc.titleStosunek Szanghajskiej Organizacji Współpracy do wojny w Ukrainiepl
dc.title.alternativeThe Stance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on the War in Ukraineen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number53-75
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzkipl
dc.identifier.eissn2451-2567
dc.referencesAbdulgaffar, M., Micah, E.E.M., Idris, M.B., Ishaq, A.A., Abdullah, A.K. 2023. The Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for Infrastructure Development and Economic Integration in Eurasia. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(2), s. 50–63. https://doi.org/10.56556/jescae.v2i2.548pl
dc.referencesAllison, R. 2004. Regionalism, Regional Structures and Security Management in Central Asia. International Affairs, 80(3), s. 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00393.xpl
dc.referencesAmbrosio, T. 2008. Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), s. 1321–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292143pl
dc.referencesArghavani Pirsalami, F., Alipour, H. 2022. Chinese Economic Diplomacy in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges. Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22067/irlip.2022.68959.1033pl
dc.referencesBazylow, L., Wieczorkiewicz, P. 2006. Historia Rosji. Wrocław: Ossolineum.pl
dc.referencesBlank, S. 2008. The Strategic Importance of Central Asia: An American View. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2400pl
dc.referencesCampbell, P. 2023. China-Russia Relations and Prospects for Regional Stability: A Historical and Conceptual Investigation (Doctoral dissertation, Bond University).pl
dc.referencesChang-Liao, N.-C. 2023. The Limits of Strategic Partnerships: Implications for China’s Role in the Russia-Ukraine War. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(2), s. 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2174702pl
dc.referencesChristoffersen, G. 2023. Central Asia Over a Decade: The Shifting Balance between Russia and China. W: G. Rozman, G. Christoffersen (red.). Putin’s “Turn to the East” in the Xi Jinping Era. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesCzaputowicz, J. 2014. Mapa współczesnego realizmu: realizm klasyczny, neorealizm, realizm neoklasyczny. W: E. Haliżak, J. Czaputowicz (red.). Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Założenia i zastosowania badawcze (s. 25–41). Warszawa: Rambler.pl
dc.referencesGarcia, Z., Modlin, K. 2022. Sino-Russian Relations and the War in Ukraine. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3165pl
dc.referencesGyene, P. 2024. The Geopolitical Implications of the Russo–Ukrainian War for Central Asia. Eurázsia Szemle, 142.pl
dc.referencesHaliżak, E. 2012. Geneza geoekonomii – ideowe i materialne przesłanki. W: E. Haliżak (red.). Geokonomia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.pl
dc.referencesHarnisch, S., Alibegović, A. 2024. The Roles of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation during Global Crises: Preferences of Illiberal Powers and Functioning of an Authoritarian International Organization. W: International Organizations Amid Global Crises (s. 49–67). Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529242980/ch003.xml (dostęp: 1.06.2025).pl
dc.referencesHitch, R. 2023. Finding Autonomy Under the Russian Bear: Explaining Central Asia’s Response to the Invasion of Ukraine. Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5180 (dostęp: 1.06.2025).pl
dc.referencesHussain, I. 2023. The Indo-US Strategic Nexus: Policy Options for Pakistan. Journal of Globalization Studies, 14(2), s. 129–142. https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2023.02.08pl
dc.referencesIqbal, B.A., Rahman, M.N. 2023. BRICS and India in the Light of Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 16, s. 159.pl
dc.referencesKelkitli, F.A. 2022. Small State Foreign Policy in Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. Insight Turkey, 24(4), s. 145–166.pl
dc.referencesKhan, A., Singh, S., Singh, B., Kaur, A. 2023. India’s Energy Diplomacy in Eurasia: Geopolitical and Geo-economic Perspectives. Springer Nature.pl
dc.referencesKhan, D.A.M. 2025. Navigating the China-Russia Alliance: A New Paradigm in International Relations. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1), Article 1.pl
dc.referencesKłysiński, K., Żochowski, P. Focused on Survival the Belarusian Political and Business ELITE POST-2020 OSW.pl
dc.referencesKról, P. 2024. Białoruś chce wziąć udział w przyszłych rozmowach pokojowych o Ukrainie. Kresy.pl. https://kresy.pl/wydarzenia/bialorus-chce-brac-udzial-rozmowach-pokojowych-o-ukrainie/ (dostęp: 1.06.2025).pl
dc.referencesLiu, D. 2024. Where Are Russia-China Energy Relations Headed? A Regime Analysis. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 65(4), s. 542–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2247405pl
dc.referencesLo, B. 2009. Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Rowman & Littlefield.pl
dc.referencesMakhmutova (Voyko), E. b.d. How SCO Contributes to Security in Eurasia. https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/how-sco-contributes-to-security-in-eurasia/ (dostęp: 6.02.2025).pl
dc.referencesMartynenko, S.E., Parkhitko N.P., 2019. Russian-Chinese Cooperation in Central Asia in the Context of ‘Belt and Road Initiative:’ Historical Retrospective and Economic Prospects. RUDN Journal of Russian History, 18(4), Article 4.pl
dc.referencesMikkelsen, N.R. 2024. Balancing Behavior in Asia? A Neorealist Analysis of Contemporary International Relations of Asia. Praha.pl
dc.referencesNazarova, K., Dauen, D., Apakhayev, N., Khushkeldiyeva, S. 2025. The New Geopolitical Reality in the SCO Space. Asian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), s. 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2447995pl
dc.referencesNyshanbayev, N., Tarman, B., Tolen, Z., Samay, A., Agybay, Z. 2024. The Republic of Kazakhstan’s Multi-Vector Foreign Policy: Re-evaluation under President Tokayev. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3).pl
dc.referencesPirani, S. 2012. Central Asian and Caspian Gas Production and the Constraints on Export. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.pl
dc.referencesRamanand, D. (2022). Sino-Russian Cooperation and Competition in Central Asia. Focus, 16(2).pl
dc.referencesSagild, R.Å., Hsiung, C.W. 2024. Chinese Re-Examinations of Russia? The Strategic Partnership in the Wake of Russia’s War Against Ukraine. Journal of Contemporary China, 34(155), s. 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2358876pl
dc.referencesSaidazimova, G. 2006. Kazakhstan: Environmentalists Say China Misusing Cross-Border Rivers. September, 1.pl
dc.referencesSaqib, N.U., Naazer, M.A. 2023. Dynamics of Regional Integration in Central Asia: A Case Study of Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of South Asian Studies, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3387/jsas.011.03.4981pl
dc.referencesŠćepanović, J. 2024. Still a Great Power? Russia’s Status Dilemmas Post-Ukraine War. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), s. 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2193878pl
dc.referencesSergei, L. 2023. Russia-China Relations: An Asymmetrical Partnership? Вестник МГИМО Университета (Wiestnik MGIMO Uniwiersitieta), 16(2), Article 2.pl
dc.referencesSikora-Gaca, M. 2015. Szanghajska Organizacja Współpracy i jej wpływ na kształtowanie globalnego zarządzania. W: M. Rewizorski (red.). Instytucje międzynarodowe w dobie globalnego zarządzania. Warszawa: Elipsa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290303263_Szanghajska_Organizacja_Wspolpracy_i_jej_wplyw_na_ksztaltowanie_globalnego_zarzadzania_Shanghai_Cooperation_Organization_and_its_Influence_on_the_Global_Governance (dostęp: 6.02.2025).pl
dc.referencesSingh, S. 2023. The Ukraine-Russia War and Non-Aligned South Asia: A Steady Walk Amidst Great Power Politics. Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), s. 109–120.pl
dc.referencesTang, W., Joldybayeva, E. 2023. Pipelines and Power Lines: China, Infrastructure and the Geopolitical (Re)construction of Central Asia. Geopolitics, 28(4), s. 1506–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2062325pl
dc.referencesWang, M. 2024. Balancing, Challenges, and Opportunities: Kazakhstanʼs Multi-Vector Foreign Policy after Ukraine Crisis. Harbin Institute of Technology.pl
dc.referencesWarren, S.A., Ganguly, S. 2022. India – Russia Relations after Ukraine. Asian Survey, 62(5–6), s. 811–837. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2022.1799235pl
dc.referencesWishnick, E. 2009. Russia, China, and the United States in Central Asia: Prospects for Great Power Competition and Cooperation in the Shadow of the Georgian Crisis. Strategic Studies Institute.pl
dc.referencesYuan, J. 2023. Forging a New Security Order in Eurasia: China, the SCO, and the Impacts on Regional Governance. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(3), s. 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00223-7pl
dc.referencesYuldasheva, G.I. 2022. New International Cooperation Trends in Central Asia. W: International Congress-2022 Future Dynamics in Asia (14–15 May 2022) Full Papers Book.pl
dc.referencesZiegler, C.E. 2024. Filling the Void Left by Great-Power Retrenchment: Russia, Central Asia, and the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan. Texas National Security Review. https://tnsr.org/2024/08/filling-the-void-left-by-great-power-retrenchment-russia-central-asia-and-the-u-s-withdrawal-from-afghanistan/ (dostęp: 1.06.2025).pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailsergiusz.wojciechowski@edu.uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1427-9657.13.11
dc.relation.volume13


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0