| dc.contributor.author | Wojciechowski, Sergiusz | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-26T11:04:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-26T11:04:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-31 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1427-9657 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/57347 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), established in 2001, plays a key role in shaping the political, economic and strategic order in Central and Eastern Asia. However, the outbreak of the war in Ukraine in 2022 exposed the organisation’s limitations arising from internal conflicts of interest among its members and its structural reliance on decision-making by consensus. This article examines the impact of the war in Ukraine on the SCO’s functioning – highlighting its institutional weaknesses, lack of a unified position and the growing power asymmetry between Russia and China. Special attention is paid to the responses of member states such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, India and Pakistan, and their attempts to balance cooperation with Russia against diversifying their international relations. The war in Ukraine has acted as a catalyst for shifts in the balance of power within the SCO, which may ultimately determine the organisation’s future as a platform for regional cooperation. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Szanghajska Organizacja Współpracy (SOW), utworzona w 2001 r., odgrywa kluczową rolę w kształtowaniu porządku politycznego, gospodarczego i strategicznego w regionie Azji Centralnej oraz Wschodniej. Konflikt w Ukrainie w 2022 r. uwidocznił jednak ograniczenia organizacji wynikające z wewnętrznych sprzeczności interesów jej członków oraz strukturalnej zależności od konsensusu decyzyjnego. Artykuł analizuje wpływ wojny w Ukrainie na funkcjonowanie SOW, uwzględniając jej instytucjonalne słabości, brak wspólnego stanowiska oraz narastającą asymetrię sił między Rosją a Chinami. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono reakcjom państw członkowskich, takich jak Kazachstan, Uzbekistan, Indie i Pakistan, oraz ich próbom balansowania między współpracą z Rosją a dywersyfikacją relacji międzynarodowych. Wojna w Ukrainie stała się katalizatorem zmian w równowadze sił w ramach SOW, które mogą zadecydować o przyszłości tej organizacji jako platformy współpracy regionalnej. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | pl | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Eastern Review;2 | pl |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | Szanghajska Organizacja Współpracy (SOW) | pl |
| dc.subject | wojna w Ukrainie | pl |
| dc.subject | Rosja | pl |
| dc.subject | Chiny | pl |
| dc.subject | Kazachstan | pl |
| dc.subject | Uzbekistan | pl |
| dc.subject | Indie | pl |
| dc.subject | Pakistan | pl |
| dc.subject | Białoruś | pl |
| dc.subject | geoekonomia | pl |
| dc.subject | Pas i Szlak | pl |
| dc.subject | suwerenność | pl |
| dc.subject | integralność terytorialna | pl |
| dc.subject | konsensus decyzyjny | pl |
| dc.subject | izolacja międzynarodowa | pl |
| dc.subject | wielobiegunowy porządek światowy | pl |
| dc.subject | dywersyfikacja relacji międzynarodowych | pl |
| dc.subject | sankcje | pl |
| dc.subject | Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) | en |
| dc.subject | war in Ukraine | en |
| dc.subject | Russia | en |
| dc.subject | China | en |
| dc.subject | Kazakhstan | en |
| dc.subject | Uzbekistan | en |
| dc.subject | India | en |
| dc.subject | Pakistan | en |
| dc.subject | Belarus | en |
| dc.subject | geoeconomics | en |
| dc.subject | Belt and Road | en |
| dc.subject | sovereignty | en |
| dc.subject | territorial integrity | en |
| dc.subject | decision-making consensus | en |
| dc.subject | international isolation | en |
| dc.subject | multipolar world order | en |
| dc.subject | diversification of international relations | en |
| dc.subject | sanctions | en |
| dc.title | Stosunek Szanghajskiej Organizacji Współpracy do wojny w Ukrainie | pl |
| dc.title.alternative | The Stance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on the War in Ukraine | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 53-75 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2451-2567 | |
| dc.references | Abdulgaffar, M., Micah, E.E.M., Idris, M.B., Ishaq, A.A., Abdullah, A.K. 2023. The Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for Infrastructure Development and Economic Integration in Eurasia. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(2), s. 50–63. https://doi.org/10.56556/jescae.v2i2.548 | pl |
| dc.references | Allison, R. 2004. Regionalism, Regional Structures and Security Management in Central Asia. International Affairs, 80(3), s. 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00393.x | pl |
| dc.references | Ambrosio, T. 2008. Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), s. 1321–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292143 | pl |
| dc.references | Arghavani Pirsalami, F., Alipour, H. 2022. Chinese Economic Diplomacy in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges. Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22067/irlip.2022.68959.1033 | pl |
| dc.references | Bazylow, L., Wieczorkiewicz, P. 2006. Historia Rosji. Wrocław: Ossolineum. | pl |
| dc.references | Blank, S. 2008. The Strategic Importance of Central Asia: An American View. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2400 | pl |
| dc.references | Campbell, P. 2023. China-Russia Relations and Prospects for Regional Stability: A Historical and Conceptual Investigation (Doctoral dissertation, Bond University). | pl |
| dc.references | Chang-Liao, N.-C. 2023. The Limits of Strategic Partnerships: Implications for China’s Role in the Russia-Ukraine War. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(2), s. 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2174702 | pl |
| dc.references | Christoffersen, G. 2023. Central Asia Over a Decade: The Shifting Balance between Russia and China. W: G. Rozman, G. Christoffersen (red.). Putin’s “Turn to the East” in the Xi Jinping Era. Routledge. | pl |
| dc.references | Czaputowicz, J. 2014. Mapa współczesnego realizmu: realizm klasyczny, neorealizm, realizm neoklasyczny. W: E. Haliżak, J. Czaputowicz (red.). Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Założenia i zastosowania badawcze (s. 25–41). Warszawa: Rambler. | pl |
| dc.references | Garcia, Z., Modlin, K. 2022. Sino-Russian Relations and the War in Ukraine. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3165 | pl |
| dc.references | Gyene, P. 2024. The Geopolitical Implications of the Russo–Ukrainian War for Central Asia. Eurázsia Szemle, 142. | pl |
| dc.references | Haliżak, E. 2012. Geneza geoekonomii – ideowe i materialne przesłanki. W: E. Haliżak (red.). Geokonomia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. | pl |
| dc.references | Harnisch, S., Alibegović, A. 2024. The Roles of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation during Global Crises: Preferences of Illiberal Powers and Functioning of an Authoritarian International Organization. W: International Organizations Amid Global Crises (s. 49–67). Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529242980/ch003.xml (dostęp: 1.06.2025). | pl |
| dc.references | Hitch, R. 2023. Finding Autonomy Under the Russian Bear: Explaining Central Asia’s Response to the Invasion of Ukraine. Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5180 (dostęp: 1.06.2025). | pl |
| dc.references | Hussain, I. 2023. The Indo-US Strategic Nexus: Policy Options for Pakistan. Journal of Globalization Studies, 14(2), s. 129–142. https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2023.02.08 | pl |
| dc.references | Iqbal, B.A., Rahman, M.N. 2023. BRICS and India in the Light of Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 16, s. 159. | pl |
| dc.references | Kelkitli, F.A. 2022. Small State Foreign Policy in Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. Insight Turkey, 24(4), s. 145–166. | pl |
| dc.references | Khan, A., Singh, S., Singh, B., Kaur, A. 2023. India’s Energy Diplomacy in Eurasia: Geopolitical and Geo-economic Perspectives. Springer Nature. | pl |
| dc.references | Khan, D.A.M. 2025. Navigating the China-Russia Alliance: A New Paradigm in International Relations. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1), Article 1. | pl |
| dc.references | Kłysiński, K., Żochowski, P. Focused on Survival the Belarusian Political and Business ELITE POST-2020 OSW. | pl |
| dc.references | Król, P. 2024. Białoruś chce wziąć udział w przyszłych rozmowach pokojowych o Ukrainie. Kresy.pl. https://kresy.pl/wydarzenia/bialorus-chce-brac-udzial-rozmowach-pokojowych-o-ukrainie/ (dostęp: 1.06.2025). | pl |
| dc.references | Liu, D. 2024. Where Are Russia-China Energy Relations Headed? A Regime Analysis. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 65(4), s. 542–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2247405 | pl |
| dc.references | Lo, B. 2009. Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Rowman & Littlefield. | pl |
| dc.references | Makhmutova (Voyko), E. b.d. How SCO Contributes to Security in Eurasia. https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/how-sco-contributes-to-security-in-eurasia/ (dostęp: 6.02.2025). | pl |
| dc.references | Martynenko, S.E., Parkhitko N.P., 2019. Russian-Chinese Cooperation in Central Asia in the Context of ‘Belt and Road Initiative:’ Historical Retrospective and Economic Prospects. RUDN Journal of Russian History, 18(4), Article 4. | pl |
| dc.references | Mikkelsen, N.R. 2024. Balancing Behavior in Asia? A Neorealist Analysis of Contemporary International Relations of Asia. Praha. | pl |
| dc.references | Nazarova, K., Dauen, D., Apakhayev, N., Khushkeldiyeva, S. 2025. The New Geopolitical Reality in the SCO Space. Asian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), s. 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2447995 | pl |
| dc.references | Nyshanbayev, N., Tarman, B., Tolen, Z., Samay, A., Agybay, Z. 2024. The Republic of Kazakhstan’s Multi-Vector Foreign Policy: Re-evaluation under President Tokayev. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3). | pl |
| dc.references | Pirani, S. 2012. Central Asian and Caspian Gas Production and the Constraints on Export. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. | pl |
| dc.references | Ramanand, D. (2022). Sino-Russian Cooperation and Competition in Central Asia. Focus, 16(2). | pl |
| dc.references | Sagild, R.Å., Hsiung, C.W. 2024. Chinese Re-Examinations of Russia? The Strategic Partnership in the Wake of Russia’s War Against Ukraine. Journal of Contemporary China, 34(155), s. 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2358876 | pl |
| dc.references | Saidazimova, G. 2006. Kazakhstan: Environmentalists Say China Misusing Cross-Border Rivers. September, 1. | pl |
| dc.references | Saqib, N.U., Naazer, M.A. 2023. Dynamics of Regional Integration in Central Asia: A Case Study of Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of South Asian Studies, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3387/jsas.011.03.4981 | pl |
| dc.references | Šćepanović, J. 2024. Still a Great Power? Russia’s Status Dilemmas Post-Ukraine War. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), s. 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2193878 | pl |
| dc.references | Sergei, L. 2023. Russia-China Relations: An Asymmetrical Partnership? Вестник МГИМО Университета (Wiestnik MGIMO Uniwiersitieta), 16(2), Article 2. | pl |
| dc.references | Sikora-Gaca, M. 2015. Szanghajska Organizacja Współpracy i jej wpływ na kształtowanie globalnego zarządzania. W: M. Rewizorski (red.). Instytucje międzynarodowe w dobie globalnego zarządzania. Warszawa: Elipsa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290303263_Szanghajska_Organizacja_Wspolpracy_i_jej_wplyw_na_ksztaltowanie_globalnego_zarzadzania_Shanghai_Cooperation_Organization_and_its_Influence_on_the_Global_Governance (dostęp: 6.02.2025). | pl |
| dc.references | Singh, S. 2023. The Ukraine-Russia War and Non-Aligned South Asia: A Steady Walk Amidst Great Power Politics. Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), s. 109–120. | pl |
| dc.references | Tang, W., Joldybayeva, E. 2023. Pipelines and Power Lines: China, Infrastructure and the Geopolitical (Re)construction of Central Asia. Geopolitics, 28(4), s. 1506–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2062325 | pl |
| dc.references | Wang, M. 2024. Balancing, Challenges, and Opportunities: Kazakhstanʼs Multi-Vector Foreign Policy after Ukraine Crisis. Harbin Institute of Technology. | pl |
| dc.references | Warren, S.A., Ganguly, S. 2022. India – Russia Relations after Ukraine. Asian Survey, 62(5–6), s. 811–837. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2022.1799235 | pl |
| dc.references | Wishnick, E. 2009. Russia, China, and the United States in Central Asia: Prospects for Great Power Competition and Cooperation in the Shadow of the Georgian Crisis. Strategic Studies Institute. | pl |
| dc.references | Yuan, J. 2023. Forging a New Security Order in Eurasia: China, the SCO, and the Impacts on Regional Governance. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(3), s. 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00223-7 | pl |
| dc.references | Yuldasheva, G.I. 2022. New International Cooperation Trends in Central Asia. W: International Congress-2022 Future Dynamics in Asia (14–15 May 2022) Full Papers Book. | pl |
| dc.references | Ziegler, C.E. 2024. Filling the Void Left by Great-Power Retrenchment: Russia, Central Asia, and the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan. Texas National Security Review. https://tnsr.org/2024/08/filling-the-void-left-by-great-power-retrenchment-russia-central-asia-and-the-u-s-withdrawal-from-afghanistan/ (dostęp: 1.06.2025). | pl |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | sergiusz.wojciechowski@edu.uni.lodz.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1427-9657.13.11 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 13 | |