Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFrąckiewicz, Ewa
dc.contributor.authorRębacz-Maron, Ewa
dc.contributor.authorCzyżycki, Rafał
dc.contributor.authorPellat, Ghislaine
dc.contributor.authorMarasová, Jana
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T12:13:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-21T12:13:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-07
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56499
dc.description.abstractGeneration Z, unlike any generation before them, lives in an era of rapid and global technological change, where most activities take place online. This lifestyle has significant implications for the well-being and health of internet users. The question is whether the contemporary socio-economic status (SES) and biological profile of Generation Z ‘immersed’ in new technologies is a universal phenomenon, independent of the country of residence. This study sets out to identify similarities and differences in the socio-economic and biological characteristics of Generation Z students from three European Union countries. Data were collected directly in France, Slovakia, and Poland. We used a survey questionnaire and non-invasive anthropometric measurements in Generation Z respondents (n=157). Our results show that there is a significant relationship between country of residence and three SES indicators: income, self-rated financial situation and time spent online, as well as three biological measures: body mass index (BMI), relative fat mass (RFM) and waist circumference (WC). Country of residence only partly explains the similarities and differences in the socio-economic status and biological characteristics of Generation Z students. In terms of SES, the participants’ profile is significantly influenced by financial situation, i.e. the student’s monthly disposable income and self-assessed financial situation, as well as time spent online. In turn, for biological factors, the significant measures are: BMI, RFM and WC.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectSESen
dc.subjectwaist circumferenceen
dc.subjectBMIen
dc.subjectRFMen
dc.subjectdynamometryen
dc.subjectEU countriesen
dc.subjectwaist adipositypl
dc.subjectBMIfr
dc.subjectdynamometrylt
dc.titleSocio-economic Status and Biological Characteristics of Students from Generation Z in France, Slovakia and Polanden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number1-18
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFrąckiewicz, Ewa - Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRębacz-Maron, Ewa - Department of Ecology and Anthropology, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCzyżycki, Rafał - Institute of Spatial Management and Socio-Economic Geography, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPellat, Ghislaine - Institut Universitaire de Technologie 2, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, Franceen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMarasová, Jana - Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakiaen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesArseni N, Reitmayer HE, Pirjol DI. 2020. Relationship Between Smartphone Addiction and Physical Activity Among Students in Timisoara. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Universitaria Consortium FEFSTIM: Physical Education, Sports and Kinesiotherapy – Implications in Quality of Life. Page 350–355 Timisoara Romania.en
dc.referencesAshwell M, Cole TJ, Dixon AK. 1996. Ratio of waist circumference to height is strong predictor of intra-abdominal fat. BMJ 313(7056): 559–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7056.559den
dc.referencesAshwell M, Gibson S. 2014. A proposal for a primary screening tool: ‘Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. BMC Med 12: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0207-1en
dc.referencesAzhar M, Nadeem S, Naz F, Perveen F, Sameen A. 2014. Impact of parental education and socio-economic status on academic achievements of university students. Europ J Psychol Res 1(1).en
dc.referencesBapat R, van Geel M, Vedder P. 2017. Socio-economic status, time spending, and sleep duration in Indian children and adolescents. J Child Fam Studies 26:80–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0557-8en
dc.referencesBarron P, Leask A. 2017. Visitor engagement at museums: Generation Y and ʼLatesʼ events at the National Museum of Scotland. Mus Manag Curator 32(5):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2017.136725en
dc.referencesBoutari C, Mantzoros CS. 2022. A 2022 update on the epidemiology of obesity and a call to action: as its twin COVID-19 pandemic appears to be receding, the obesity and dysmetabolism pandemic continues to rage on. Metabol 133:155217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155217en
dc.referencesBrown P, Guy M, Broad J. 2005. Individual socio-economic status. community socio-economic status and stroke in New Zealand: A case control study. Soc Sci Med 61(6): 1174–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.003en
dc.referencesColhoun HM, Hemingway H, Poulter NR. 1998. Socio-economic status and blood pressure: an overview analysis. J Hum Hyper 12:91–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000558en
dc.referencesEurostat Everyday use of the Internet. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_CI_IFP_FU__custom_7984572/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 20 October 2023].en
dc.referencesEurostat on Internet use by people aged 16–24 years. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_ci_ifp_iu__custom_7964137/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 19 October 2023].en
dc.referencesEurostat, calculations on the percentage of people aged 15–24 years in 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00010/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 19 October 2023].en
dc.referencesGoh E, Lee C. 2018. A workforce to be reckoned with: The emerging pivotal Generation Z hospitality workforce. Int J Hospital Manag 73:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.016en
dc.referencesHemmerechtsa K, Agirdagb O, Kavadiasa D. 2017. The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Education Rev 69(1):85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667en
dc.referencesHuikari S, Junttila H, la-Mursula L, Jamsa T, Korpelainen R, Miettunen J, Korhonen M. 2021. Leisure-time physical activity is associated with socio-economic status beyond income – Cross-sectional survey of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. Econom Hum Biol 41:100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100969en
dc.referencesKall J. 2015. Branding na smartfonie. Komunikacja mobilna marki. Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa 2015, 236 (in Polish).en
dc.referencesLevickaite R. 2010. Generations H, Y, Z: How Social Networks Form the Concept of the World Without Borders (The Case of Lithuania). LIMES: Cult Regional 3(2):170– 83. https://doi.org/10.3846/limes.2010.17en
dc.referencesLin Y, Zhang Q, Chen W, Ling L. 2017. The social income inequality. social integration and health status of internal migrants in China. Int J Equit Health 16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9en
dc.referencesMannheim K. 1952. The Problem of Generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on The Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276– 322). Routledge.en
dc.referencesMartin R, Saller K. 1958. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellung. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag Stuttgart.en
dc.referencesMladkova L. 2017. Generation Z in the literature. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE) 2017 (ERIE) Book Series Efficiency and Responsibility in Education. Prague. Czech Republic. 255–261.en
dc.referencesRantanen T, Volpato S, Ferrucci L, Heikkinen E, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. 2003. Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(5):636–41. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00207.xen
dc.referencesSahni S, Talwar A, Khanijo S, Talwar A. 2017. Socioeconomic status and its relationship to chronic respiratory disease. Adv Resp Med 85:97–108. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.2017.0016en
dc.referencesSainz M, Martinez R, Moya M, Rodriguez- Bailon R, Vaes J. 2021. Lacking socio- economic status reduces subjective well-being through perceptions of meta- dehumanization. British J Soc Psychol 60(2):470–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12412en
dc.referencesSasaki H, Kasagi F, Yamada M, Fujita S. 2007. Grip strength predicts cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly persons. Am J Med 120(4):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.018en
dc.referencesStark O. 2023. On a tendency in health economics to dwell on income inequality and underestimate social stress. Econ Hum Biol. 49:101232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101232en
dc.referencesTeddlie Ch, Yu F. 2017. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mix Met 77: 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430en
dc.referencesTurner A. 2015. Generation Z: technology and social interest. J Ind Psychol 71(2):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021en
dc.referencesWHO. 2022. World Obesity Day 2022 – Accelerating action to stop obesity. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2022-world-obesity-day-2022-accelerating-action-to-stop-obesity [Accessed 23 October 2023].en
dc.referencesWHO. 2023a. Body mass index (BMI). Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index [Accessed 23 October 2023].en
dc.referencesWHO. 2023b. A healthy lifestyle – WHO recommendations. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations [Accessed 19 October 2023].en
dc.referencesWoolcott OO, Bergman RN. 2018. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage – A cross-sectional study in American adult individuals. Sci Rep 8:10980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1en
dc.referencesWoolcott OO, Seuring T. 2022. Prevalence trends in obesity defined by the Relative Fat Mass (RFM) index among adults in the United States: 1999-2018. Metab-Clin Experiment 128:S25-S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2021.155027en
dc.referencesWorld Economic Forum. 2023. Jak będzie wyglądał rynek pracy za kilka lat? Available at: https://coderslab.pl/pl/blog/jak-bedziewygladal-rynek-pracy-za-kilka-lat [Accessed 9 October 2023].en
dc.referencesWorld Populations Prospects. 2022. Population Facts. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2015_factsheet1.pdf [Accessed 19 October 2023].en
dc.referencesYadav GP, Rai J. 2017. The Generation Z and their social media usage: a review and a research outline. Glob J Entere Inf System 9(2):110–6. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2017/15748en
dc.contributor.authorEmailFrąckiewicz, Ewa - ewa.frackiewicz@usz.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailRębacz-Maron, Ewa - ewa.rebacz-maron@usz.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailCzyżycki, Rafał - rafal.czyzycki@usz.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailPellat, Ghislaine - ghislaine.pellat@iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr
dc.contributor.authorEmailMarasová, Jana - jana.marasova@umb.sk
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.88.3.01
dc.relation.volume88


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0