Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBhardwaj, Ruby
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T12:56:17Z
dc.date.available2025-08-19T12:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56150
dc.description.abstractCharacterized by the interplay of care and contracts, surrogacy is an exclusive form of gendered work. The paper is based on a micro-level ethnographic study exploring the lived and embodied challenges of commercial gestational surrogates in Gujarat, India, who were undertaking surrogacy work after the ban on transnational surrogacy. The experiential accounts collected through in-depth, face-to-face interviews bear the challenges, stigma, and shame involved in surrogacy work. Not only is surrogacy work devalued, deprived of dignity, and shrouded in secrecy, but it is also corrupted by contracts, complicated by alienation and relinquishment of the gestated child. Surrogates disguise their work and stay in surrogacy hostels. Poverty in India compels many women to engage in surrogacy to eke out a living and improve their living conditions. Surrogate mothers are poorly paid, deprived of health benefits and legal security, they receive only twenty percent of the total cost of the surrogacy arrangement, and are also treated as fungible and disposable. The paper adopts the ethics of care perspective to analyze surrogacy arrangements. Such a perspective is directed toward promoting a responsible and humane attitude toward commercial surrogates. It is motivated by the need to uphold the dignity of the surrogates, their legal rights, and the social recognition of their work. The application of care ethics can alleviate the neglect and oppression of surrogates.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectCommercial Surrogacyen
dc.subjectEthics of Careen
dc.subjectMothersen
dc.subjectContractsen
dc.subjectStigmaen
dc.subjectSecrecyen
dc.titleLabor of Care and Contracts: A Study of Surrogacy after the Transnational Ban in Indiaen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number30-47
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJanki Devi Memorial College, University of Delhi, Indiaen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesBailey, Alison. 2011. Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy. Illinois, IL: Illinois State University.en
dc.referencesBerkhout, Suze. 2008. “Buns in the Oven: Objectification, Surrogacy, and Women’s Autonomy.” Social Theory and Practice 34(1):95-117.en
dc.referencesChokhani, Priyanka. 2021. “Pandemic Pushing More Women into Surrogacy.” Times of India, September 03, p. 14.en
dc.referencesDolezal, Luna. 2017. “Phenomenology and Intercorporeality in the Case of Commercial Surrogacy.” Pp. 311-336 in Body/ Self/Other: The Phenomenology of Social Encounters, edited by L. Dolezal and D. Petherbridge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.en
dc.referencesFirestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Morrow.en
dc.referencesGilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesGilligan, Carol. 2013. The Ethic of Care. Barcelona: Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas.en
dc.referencesGupta, Jyotsna. 2012. “Reproductive Biocrossings: Indian Egg Donors and Surrogates in the Globalized Fertility Market.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5(1):25-51.en
dc.referencesGupta, Jyotsna and Annemiek Richters. 2008. “Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Pbjects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies, and the Right to Self-Determination.” Bioethical Inquiry 5:239-249.en
dc.referencesHeld, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesHochschild, Arlie. 2015. “The Surrogate’s Womb.” Gender and Research 16(2):42-52.en
dc.referencesICMR. 2010. The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill-2010, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), 4(a). Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Governemnt of India.en
dc.referencesKrause, Franziska. 2018. “Caring Relationships: Commercial Surrogacy and the Ethical Relevance of the Other.” In Care in Healthcare Reflections on Theory and Practice, edited by F. Krause and J. Boldt. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved July 05, 2025 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK543739/en
dc.referencesLaw Commission of India, Report 228. 2009. Need for Legislation to Regulate Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics as well as Rights and Obligations of Parties to a Surrogacy. New Delhi: Government of India. Retrieved July 05, 2025 http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.inen
dc.referencesMajumdar, Anindita. 2014. “Nurturing an Alien Pregnancy: Surrogate Mothers, Intended Parents, and Disembodied Relationships.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 21(2):199-224.en
dc.referencesMinistry of Law and Justice, Government of India. 2021. The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act. Retrieved November 16, 2024 https://dhr.gov.in/document/acts-circulars/surrogacy-regulation-act-2021en
dc.referencesPande, Amrita. 2009. “Not an ‘Angel,’ Not a ‘Whore’: Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ Workers in India.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16(2):141-173.en
dc.referencesPande, Amrita. 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker.” Signs 35(4):969-992.en
dc.referencesPande, Amrita. 2011. “Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India: Gifts for Global Sisters? Travelling for Conception and the Global ART Market.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23:618-625.en
dc.referencesPande, Amrita. 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.en
dc.referencesParks, Jennifer. 2010. “Care Ethics and the Global Practice of Commercial Surrogacy.” Bioethics 24(7):333-340.en
dc.referencesQadeer, Imrana. 2009. “Social and Ethical Basis of Legislation on Surrogacy: Need for Debate.” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 6(1):28-31.en
dc.referencesQadeer, Imrana and Mary John. 2009. “The Business and Ethics of Surrogacy.” Economic and Political Weekly 44(2):10-12.en
dc.referencesRagone, Helena. 1996. “Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers and Fathers.” American Ethnologist 23(2):352-364.en
dc.referencesReddy, Sunita. 2016. “Art Bill Still Pending, When Will Surrogates Get Their Due Share in India?” Review of Public Administration and Management 4(1):184.en
dc.referencesRuddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politic of Peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.en
dc.referencesRudrappa, Sharmila. 2015. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.en
dc.referencesRudrappa, Sharmila and Caitlyn Collins. 2015. “Altruistic Agencies and Compassionate Consumers: Moral Framing of Transnational Surrogacy.” Gender and Society 29(6):937-959.en
dc.referencesSelect Committee, Rajya Sabha. 2019. The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill. New Delhi: Government of India.en
dc.referencesSherwin, Susan. 1989. “Feminist and Medical Ethics: Two Different Approaches to Contextual Ethics.” Hypatia 4(2):57-72.en
dc.referencesShetty, Priya. 2012. “India’s Unregulated Surrogacy Industry.” Lancet 380(9854):1633-1634.en
dc.referencesSuryanarayan, Sheela. 2023. “Poverty and Commercial Surrogacy in India: An Intersectional Analytical Approach.” Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence 8(2): Art. 4. Retrieved July 05, 2025 https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol8/iss2/4/en
dc.referencesTanderup, Malene et al. 2015. “Reproductive Ethics in Commercial Surrogacy: Decision-Making in IVF Clinics in New Delhi, India.” Bioethical Inquiry 12(3):491-501.en
dc.referencesTeman, Elly. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesTronto, Joan. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesVora, Kalindi. 2009. “Indian Transnational Surrogacy and the Disaggregation of Mothering Work.” Anthropology News 50(2):9-12.en
dc.referencesWoo, Irene et al. 2017. “Perinatal Outcomes after Natural Conception versus In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) in Gestational Surrogates: A Model to Evaluate IVF Treatment versus Maternal Effects.” Fertility and Sterility 108(6):993-998.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailruby@jdm.du.ac.in
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.21.3.02
dc.relation.volume21


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0