Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Building Liveable Futures: Dwelling as Collaborative Survival After Climate Change

dc.contributor.authorChaberski, Mateusz
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-16T12:25:14Z
dc.date.available2024-12-16T12:25:14Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-28
dc.identifier.issn2083-2931
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53972
dc.description.abstractTaking a cue from Tim Ingold’s post-humanist reflection on building and dwelling as more-than-human practices, the article aims to revisit dwelling as a strategy of “collaborative survival” (Tsing) in the context of the ongoing climate emergency. Drawing on the findings of more-than-human geography and environmental (post)humanities, the article scrutinizes three examples of contemporary speculative projects at the intersection of architecture, design and performative arts that imagine different strategies of building with and for more-than-humans as a climate change adaptation strategy. Firstly, the installation Refuge for Resurgence (2021) by the Los Angeles-based design studio Superflux, a banquet table designed for humans and various species of animals, is analyzed in order to interrogate the relation between dwelling and multispecies interdependence. Secondly, the article scrutinizes the multimedia project Pending Xenophora (2020–22) by Mari Bastashevski, an architecture created with an endangered species of snail, to show more-than-human care (Puig de la Bellacasa) as key to surviving climate change. Finally, the article looks into the project The Anthropocene Museum (2020–ongoing) by the Kenyan collective Cave_bureau to unravel decolonial aspects of dwelling as collaborative survival.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture;14en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectdwellingen
dc.subjectspeculative designen
dc.subjectcollaborative survivalen
dc.subjectclimate changeen
dc.subjectmore-than-humanen
dc.subjectthe Anthropoceneen
dc.titleBuilding Liveable Futures: Dwelling as Collaborative Survival After Climate Changeen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number168-185
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University in Krakówen
dc.identifier.eissn2084-574X
dc.referencesBakke, Monika. “Introduction: The Sheltering Sky of the City.” Refugia. The Survival of Urban Transspecies Communities, edited by Monika Bakke, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2021, pp. 17–23.en
dc.referencesBastashevski, Mari. Pending Xenophora. Mari Bastashevski, 2020–22, https://www.maribastashevski.com/pending-xenophora accessed 10 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesBastashevski, Mari. “Unwhorl.” Vimeo, https://vimeo.com/546195072 accessed 10 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesCave_bureau. Anthropocene Museum 1.0–10.0. Cave_bureau, https://www.cave.co.ke/cave-canon accessed 20 Jan. 2024.en
dc.referencesCostanza, Robert, et al. “Twenty Years of Ecosystem Services: How Far Have We Come and How Far Do We Still Need to Go?” Ecosystem Services, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008en
dc.referencesCrutzen, Paul, and Eugene Stoermer. “The Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter, vol. 41, 2000, pp. 17–18.en
dc.referencesEscobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke UP, 2016.en
dc.referencesEuropean Commission. “Nature-Based Solutions & Re-Naturing Cities” (full version). Publications Office, 2015, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/479582 accessed 20 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesFerdinand, Malcom. Decolonial Ecology. Thinking from the Caribbean World. Polity, 2021.en
dc.referencesHaraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25qen
dc.referencesIngold, Tim. The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Taylor and Francis, 2000.en
dc.referencesJacque, Andrés, Marina Otero Verzier, and Lucia Pietroiusti. Editorial. More-Than-Human, edited by Andrés Jacque, Marina Otero Verzier and Lucia Pietroiusti, Het Nieuwe Instituut, 2017, pp. 6–9.en
dc.referencesKaranja, Kabage, and Stella Mutegi. “In Practice: Cave Bureau on a Museum for the Anthropocene.” The Architectural Review, 15 Apr. 2021, https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/in-practice/in-practice-cave-bureau-on-a-museum-for-the-anthropocene accessed 20 Sept. 2023.en
dc.references“Nature-Based Solutions.” European Commission, https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en accessed 20 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesNeyrat, Frédéric. The Unconstructible Earth. An Ecology of Separation. Fordham UP, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823282609en
dc.referencesPuig de la Bellacasa, Maria. Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. U of Minnesota P, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700002096en
dc.referencesSanter, Steve. “The Difficulty of Leaving Human Dominance in More-than-Human Contexts.” Medium, 18 Sept. 2021, https://medium.com/future-human-by-design-philosophy-of-design/the-difficulty-of-leaving-human-dominance-in-more-than-human-contexts-ffefe40bfde accessed 19 Jan. 2024.en
dc.referencesSarkis, Hashim. “Statement.” La Biennale Di Venezia, 2021, https://www.labiennale.org/en/architecture/2021/statement-hashim-sarkis accessed 20 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesShah, Devanshi. “STIRring Together: ‘Refuge for Resurgence’ Offers Glimpse into a New Way of Living.” STIRworld, 9 May 2021, https://www.stirworld.com/see-features-stirring-together-refuge-for-resurgence-offers-glimpse-into-a-new-way-of-living accessed 20 Sept. 2023.en
dc.referencesStengers, Isabelle, and Didier Debaise. Gestes spéculatifs. Les presses du réel, 2015.en
dc.referencesSuperflux. Refuge for Resurgence. 2021. Biennale Architettura, La Biennale Di Venezia.en
dc.referencesTsing, Anna. “A Threat to Holocene Resurgence is a Threat to Liveability.” The Anthropology of Sustainability: Beyond Development and Progress, edited by Marc Brightman and Jerome Lewis, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_3en
dc.referencesTsing, Anna. The Mushroom at the End of the World. On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton UP, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873548en
dc.referencesVan Dooren, Thom. A World in a Shell: Snail Stories for a Time of Extinctions, MIT P, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14579.001.0001en
dc.referencesWakkary, Ron. Things We Could Design. For More Than Human-Centered Worlds. MIT P, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13649.001.0001en
dc.referencesYusoff, Kathryn. “Broken Earth & Built Earths: Architectures at an Inhuman Impasse.” YouTube, uploaded by Yale School of Architecture, 7 June 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE7N8Xf1eXk accessed 10 Sept. 2023.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmateusz.chaberski@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2083-2931.14.11


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
168-185_Chaberski.pdf
Rozmiar:
323.8KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0