Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Financial determinants of mode substitution in residents’ travel behaviour: a case study of public bike-sharing in Lodz, Poland

dc.contributor.authorTrippner-Hrabi, Justyna
dc.contributor.authorPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona
dc.contributor.authorWójcik, Szymon
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-21T06:58:57Z
dc.date.available2024-10-21T06:58:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53474
dc.description.abstractBike-sharing networks have achieved considerable success in many cities worldwide, gaining a growing number of supporters for this mode of transportation. While the existing literature covers various aspects related to bike-sharing, the exploration of the relationship between these networks and the financial benefits for residents when transitioning to cycling has been somewhat limited. Therefore, the main objective of our article is to identify the factors influencing urban residents’ decisions to switch to cycling and to understand the significance of financial considerations in shaping changes in travel behaviour.We assessed the perceived affordability of bike-sharing services by measuring respondent satisfaction (via Computer Assisted Personal Interviews – CAPI) with the rental prices of city bicycles. To examine the relationships between variables, we employed statistical tests, including the Fisher test, the chi-square test of independence, and the Mann-Whitney test. Our research findings confirmed that replacing public transportation with bicycles has the most substantial impact, while substituting car trips has a relatively minor effect. Furthermore, our analysis revealed statistically significant associations between price satisfaction and the decision to abandon car travel in favour of cycling, as well as the motivation to save costs and substituting walking and public transport with bicycle travel.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectbike-sharingen
dc.subjecttravel behaviouren
dc.subjectfinancial and economical determinantsen
dc.subjectmodal substitutionen
dc.titleFinancial determinants of mode substitution in residents’ travel behaviour: a case study of public bike-sharing in Lodz, Polanden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number79-98
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTrippner-Hrabi, Justyna - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economicsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Labour and Social Policyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWójcik, Szymon - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Econometricsen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesABDULLAH, M., ALI, N., HUSSAIN, S. A., ASLAM, A. B. and JAVID, M. A. (2021), ‘Measuring changes in travel behavior pattern due to COVID-19 in a developing country: A case study of Pakistan’, Transport Policy, 108, pp. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.023en
dc.referencesBARBOUR, N., ZHANG, Y. and MANNERING, F. (2019), ‘A statistical analysis of bike sharing usage and its potential as an auto-trip substitute’, Journal of Transport and Health, 12, pp. 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.004en
dc.referencesBARTOSIEWICZ, B. and PIELESIAK, I. (2019), ‘Spatial patterns of travel behaviour in Poland’, Travel Behaviour and Society, 15, pp. 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.01.004en
dc.referencesBASU, R. and FERREIRA, J. (2021), ‘Planning car-lite neighborhoods: Does bikesharing reduce auto-dependence?’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102721en
dc.referencesBECKER, S. and RUDOLF, C. (2018), ‘Exploring the potential of free cargo-bikesharing for sustainable mobility’, GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27 (1), pp. 156−164. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.11en
dc.referencesBIELIŃSKI, T., KWAPISZ, A. and WAŻNA, A. (2019), ‘Bike-Sharing Systems in Poland’, Sustainability, 11 (9), 2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092458en
dc.referencesBIELIŃSKI, T., KWAPISZ, A. and WAŻNA, A. (2021), ‘Electric bike-sharing services mode substitution for driving, public transit, and cycling’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 96, 102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102883en
dc.referencesBOROWSKA-STEFAŃSKA, M., KOWALSKI, M., KURZYK, P., SAHEBGHARANI, A., SAPIŃSKA, P., WIŚNIEWSKI, S., GONIEWICZ, K. and DULEBENETS, M. A. (2023), ‘Assessing the impacts of sunday trading restrictions on urban public transport: An example of a big city in central Poland’, Journal of Public Transportation, 25, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2023.100049en
dc.referencesBOROWSKA-STEFAŃSKA, M., KOWALSKI, M. and WIŚNIEWSKI S. (2020), Funkcjonowanie roweru publicznego w dużym mieście. Przykład Łodzi, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-996-2en
dc.referencesBOROWSKA-STEFAŃSKA, M., MIKUSOVA, M., KOWALSKI, M., KURZYK, P. and WIŚNIEWSKI, S. (2021), ‘Changes in urban mobility related to the public bike system with regard to weather conditions and statutory retail restrictions’, Remote Sensing, 13 (18), 3597. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183597en
dc.referencesBULLOCK, C., BRERETON, F. and BAILEY, S. (2017), ‘The economic contribution of public bike-share to the sustainability and efficient functioning of cities’, Sustainable cities and society, 28, pp. 76−87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.024en
dc.referencesCAMPBELL, A., CHERRY, C. R., RYERSON, M. S. and YANG, X. (2016), ‘Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, pp. 399−414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.004en
dc.referencesCAO, Y. and SHEN, D. (2019), ‘Contribution of shared bikes to carbon dioxide emission reduction and the economy in Beijing’, Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101749en
dc.referencesCHEN, B., LI, J., SU, H., LU, K., CHEN, H. and HUANG, J. (2022c), ‘Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emission reduction through bike-sharing for sustainable cities’, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102789en
dc.referencesCHEN, M., CAI, Y., ZHOU, Y., CHEN, L., WAN, H. and LI, Z. (2023), ‘Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment for bike-sharing systems based on a rebalancing emission estimation model’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 191, 106892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106892en
dc.referencesCHEN, Y., ZHANG, Y., COFFMAN, D. M. and MI, Z. (2022a), ‘An environmental benefit analysis of bike sharing in New York City’, Cities, 121, 103475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103475en
dc.referencesCHEN, Z., VAN LIEROP, D. and ETTEMA, D. (2022b), ‘Dockless bike-sharing’s impact on mode substitution and influential factors: Evidence from Beijing, China’, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 15 (1), pp. 71-93. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.1983en
dc.referencesCRISOSTOMI, E., FAIZRAHNEMOON, M., SCHLOTE, A. and SHORTEN, R. (2015), ‘A Markov-chain based model for a bike-sharing system’, International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), pp. 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVE.2015.12en
dc.referencesDUAN, Y., WANG, J., LI, H., YAN, Y. and ZHANG, X. (2023), ‘A Comparison in Travel Characteristics of Bike-Sharing between College Students and Office Workers Based on Theory of Planned Behavior’, Behavioral Sciences, 13 (4), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040329en
dc.referencesDZIĘCIELSKI, M., WOŹNIAK, M. and RADZIMSKI, A. (2020), ‘Exploring bike-sharing systems in Poland co-financed from the European Union funds’, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 23 (4), pp. 7−18. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.023.13125en
dc.referencesFISHMAN, E., WASHINGTON, S. and HAWORTH, N. (2013), ‘Bike share: a synthesis of the literature’, Transport reviews, 33 (2), pp. 148−165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.775612en
dc.referencesFISHMAN, E., WASHINGTON, S. and HAWORTH, N. (2014), ‘Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, pp. 13−20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013en
dc.referencesGUO, Y. and ZHANG, Y. (2021), ‘Understanding factors influencing shared e-scooter usage and its impact on auto mode substitution’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 99, 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102991en
dc.referencesJAVAID, A., CREUTZIG, F. and BAMBERG, S. (2020), ‘Determinants of low-carbon transport mode adoption: systematic review of reviews’, Environmental Research Letters, 15 (10), 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba032en
dc.referencesJÄPPINEN, S., TOIVONEN, T. and SALONEN, M. (2013), ‘Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: An open data approach’, Applied Geography, 43, pp. 13−24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.010en
dc.referencesJĘDRZEJEWSKI, A. (2022), ‘Rower miejski na nowo. Jakich zmian wymaga w Polsce bike sharing?’ https://smartride.pl/rower-miejski-na-nowo-jakich-zmian-wymaga-w-polsce-bike-sharing/ [accessed on: 15.12.2023].en
dc.referencesJI, Y. (2023), ‘Research on Pricing of Parent-Child Shared Bicycles Based on Biogeme’, Proceedings of the 4th Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference MSIEID 2022, Chongqing, China, 9-11 December, 2022.en
dc.referencesJIN, H., JIN, F., WANG, J. E., SUN, W. and DONG, L. (2019), ‘Competition and cooperation between shared bicycles and public transit: A case study of Beijing’, Sustainability, 11 (5), 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051323en
dc.referencesJOHANSSON, F., HENRIKSSON, G. and ENVALL, P. (2019), ‘Moving to private-car-restricted and mobility-served neighborhoods: The unspectacular workings of a progressive mobility plan’, Sustainability, 11 (22), 6208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226208en
dc.referencesKU, D.-G., UM, J.-S., BYON, Y.-J., KIM, J.-Y. and LEE, S.-J. (2021), ‘Changes in passengers’ travel behavior due to COVID-19’, Sustainability, 13 (14), 7974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147974en
dc.referencesKUŹMA J., POŁOM, M. and ŻUKOWSKA, S. (2022), ‘Rozwój mobilności współdzielonej w Polsce na tle tendencji europejskich’, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 25 (1), pp. 7−22. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.22.003.15963en
dc.referencesKWIATKOWSKI, M. A. and BIEGAŃSKA, J. (2021), ‘Rower publiczny 1. generacji w XXI w. – studium przypadku Krotoszyna’, Rozwój regionalny i polityka regionalna, 14 (57), pp. 207−219. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2021.57.14en
dc.referencesKWIATKOWSKI, M. A. (2018), ‘Bike-sharing-boom – rozwój nowych form zrównoważonego transportu w Polsce na przykładzie roweru publicznego’, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21 (3), pp. 60−69. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.18.017.10142en
dc.referencesKWIATKOWSKI, M. A. (2021), ‘Metropolitan bicycle-sharing system in the context of various needs of cities, towns, and villages’, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 54, pp. 97−111. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2021-0036en
dc.referencesLI, H., ZHANG, Y., ZHU, M. and REN, G. (2021), ‘Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 150, pp. 140−155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.010en
dc.referencesLÓPEZ-CASASNOVAS, G. (2009), ‘El Bicing no es tan buena idea’, El Periódico de Cata-lunya, https://www.elperiodico.com/es/opinion/20090415/el-bicing-no-es-tan-buena-idea-125973 [accessed on: 18.12.2023].en
dc.referencesLU, M., HSU, S.-C., CHEN, P.-C. and LEE, W.-Y. (2018), ‘Improving the sustainability of integrated transportation system with bike-sharing: A spatial agent-based approach’, Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, pp. 44−51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.023en
dc.referencesMAAS, S., NIKOLAOU, P., ATTARD, M. and DIMITRIOU, L. (2021), ‘Examining spatio-temporal trip patterns of bicycle sharing systems in Southern European Island cities’, Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100992en
dc.referencesMACIOSZEK, E., ŚWIERK, P. and KUREK, A. (2020), ‘The bike-sharing system as an element of enhancing sustainable mobility - A case study based on a city in Poland’, Sustainability, 12 (8), 3285. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083285en
dc.referencesMETROPOLIA GZM (2023), Metrorower zaprezentowany! Powstaje największy system roweru miejskiego w Polsce, https://metropoliagzm.pl/2023/10/31/metrorower-zaprezentowany-powstaje-najwiekszy-system-roweru-miejskiego-w-polsce/ [accessed on: 15.12.2023].en
dc.referencesMIDGLEY, P. (2011), ‘Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas’, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 8, pp. 1−12.en
dc.referencesMOBILNE MIASTO (2020), Ostre hamowanie roweru miejskiego. Bikesharing w Polsce 2019/2020 https://mobilne-miasto.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Mobilne_Miasto_raport_bikesharing_final.pdf [accessed on: 18.12.2023].en
dc.referencesMOBILNE MIASTO (2023), RAPORT: Rekordowa podaż pojazdów. Mikromobilność w Polsce 2022, https://mobilne-miasto.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/RAPORT_MIKROSHARING_2022_final.pdf [accessed on: 15.12.2023].en
dc.referencesNARAYANAN, S., MAKAROV, N., MAGKOS, E., SALANOVA GRAU, J. M., AIFADOPOULOU, G. and ANTONIOU, C. (2023), ‘Can Bike-Sharing Reduce Car Use in Alexandroupolis? An Exploration through the Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models’, Smart Cities, 6 (3), pp. 1239−1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030060en
dc.referencesNIEUWENHUIJSEN, M. J. and ROJAS-RUEDA, D. (2020), ‘Chapter Ten – Bike-sharing systems and health’, [in:] NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M. J. and KHREIS, H. (eds), Advances in Transportation and Health, Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 239−250. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819136-1.00010-3en
dc.referencesOTERO, I., NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M. J. and ROJAS-RUEDA, D. (2018), ‘Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe’, Environment International, 115, pp. 387−394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014en
dc.referencesPAMUŁA, A. and GONTAR, B. (2017), ‘Rower miejski w Łodzi – ocena użytkowników’, Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 52 (4), pp. 490−499. https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2017.4.36en
dc.referencesPAWŁOWSKA, J. (2019), ‘Systemy roweru miejskiego jako przejaw ekonomii współdzielenia’, Zeszyty Studenckie „NASZE STUDIA”, 9, pp. 27−38.en
dc.referencesPODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A., PRZYWOJSKA, J. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2022), ‘A Public Value-Based, Multilevel Evaluation Framework to Examine Public Bike-Sharing Systems. Implications for Cities’ Sustainable Transport Policies’, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 23 (2), pp. 180–194. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2022-0016en
dc.referencesPODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2021), ‘Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9, pp. 651−662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003en
dc.referencesPUCHER, J., BUEHLER, R. and SEINEN, M. (2011), ‘Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and reappraisal of cycling trends and policies’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45 (6), pp. 451−475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001en
dc.referencesQIU, L.-Y. and HE, L.-Y. (2018), ‘Bike sharing and the economy, the environment, and health-related externalities’, Sustainability, 10 (4), 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041145en
dc.referencesRADZIMSKI, A. and DZIĘCIELSKI, M. (2021), ‘Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 145, pp. 189−202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.003en
dc.referencesRICCI, M. (2015), ‘Bike sharing: A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation’, Research in Transportation Business and Management, 15, pp. 28−38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.003en
dc.referencesRODRIGUEZ-VALENCIA, A., ROSAS-SATIZABAL, D., UNDA, R. and HANDY, S. (2021), ‘The decision to start commuting by bicycle in Bogota, Colombia: Motivations and influences’, Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, pp. 57−67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.02.003en
dc.referencesROWEROWA ŁÓDŹ (2022), ‘Rower publiczny ciągle zawodzi’, https://rowerowalodz.pl/rower-publiczny/rower-publiczny-ciagle-zawodzi [accessed on: 15.12.2023].en
dc.referencesSHAHEEN, S. and CHAN, N. (2016), ‘Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections’, Built Environment (1978-), 42 (4), pp. 573−588.en
dc.referencesSHAHEEN, S., COHEN, A. and ZOHDY, I. (2016), ‘Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles’, Shared Mobility Primer, https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42193 [accessed on: 20.12.2023].en
dc.referencesSHELAT, S., HUISMAN, R. and VAN OORT, N. (2018), ‘Analysing the trip and user characteristics of the combined bicycle and transit mode’, Research in Transportation Economics, 69, pp. 68−76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.017en
dc.referencesTAN, L. and MA, C. (2021), ‘Choice behavior of commuters’ rail transit mode during the COVID-19 pandemic based on logistic model’, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 8 (2), pp. 186−195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.002en
dc.referencesWATSON, M. and SHOVE, E. (2008), ‘Product, competence, project and practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption’, Journal of consumer culture, 8 (1), pp. 69−89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507085en
dc.referencesWIŚNIEWSKI, S., BOROWSKA-STEFAŃSKA, M., DULEBENETS, M., KOWALSKI, M. and MASIEREK, E. (2023), ‘Changeability of transport behaviour in a large city from the perspective of working days and Sundays: The case of Łódź, Poland’, Moravian Geographical Reports, 31 (1), pp. 14−26. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2023-0002en
dc.referencesWOLNY-KUCIŃSKA, A. (2020), ‘Rower podmiejski – koncepcja roweru publicznego na obszarach codziennych dojazdów do miast na przykładzie Polski’, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 23 (1), pp. 41−57. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.012.12114en
dc.referencesZHANG, Z., GUO, Y. and FENG, L. (2022), ‘Externalities of dockless bicycle-sharing systems: Implications for green recovery of the transportation sector’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, pp. 410−419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.009en
dc.referencesZHAO, P. and LI, S. (2017), ‘Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, pp. 46−60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.003en
dc.referencesZHI, D., SUN, H., LV, Y. and XU, G. (2022), ‘Quantifying the comprehensive benefit of the bike-sharing system under cycling behavior differences’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134660en
dc.contributor.authorEmailTrippner-Hrabi, Justyna - justyna.hrabi@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona - aldona.podgorniak@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailWójcik, Szymon - szymon.wojcik@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.31.1.07
dc.relation.volume31


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
79-98_Trippner_i_in..pdf
Rozmiar:
512.9KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0