Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Authenticity of the “Interrogatio” Iohannis in the Light of Contemporary Deconstructionist Source Criticism

dc.contributor.authorCzarnecki, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T10:14:32Z
dc.date.available2024-03-06T10:14:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/50675
dc.description.abstractScholars of Catharism representing the deconstructionist current in the recent years continue their struggle with the traditional interpretation of this heresy which underlines its dualistic character and strong connections with Eastern dualisms – especially with Bogomilism. Their tactics is focused primarily on questioning the authenticity of the sources confirming Cathar dualism and its Eastern roots. Such sources are presented as forgeries invented by the Catholics trying to discredit the “dissidents”. This tactic is directed primarily against the sources of heretical provenience, which are the strongest arguments against the deconstructionist interpretation. Previously, the deconstructionist scholars questioned the acts of the Cathar council in Saint-Felix-De-Caraman, and the so-called “Manichaean treatise” – a Cathar theological work aimed at proving ontological dualism based on the specific interpretation of numerous biblical passages. Currently the deconstructionists speak about the need for verification of another Cathar dualistic treatise – Liber De Duobus pricipiis. Considering this we may expect that soon also the Interrogatio Iohannis will be questioned, as it is a crucial source confirming both the dualism of the Cathars and their dependence on the Bogomils. Before it happens I decided to take a closer look at this apocryphal text. Through the analysis of its doctrine in the light of the Eastern sources concerning the Bogomils I am going to answer the question of whether this work, known only from the Latin manuscripts, indeed could have been created by the Bogomils and if it is possible to question its authenticity using the patterns used by the deconstructionist scholars.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceraneaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectInterrogatio Iohannisen
dc.subjectBogomilismen
dc.subjectCatharismen
dc.subjectdualist doctrineen
dc.titleAuthenticity of the “Interrogatio” Iohannis in the Light of Contemporary Deconstructionist Source Criticismen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number99-123
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute for the Study of Religionsen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesAccipite nobis vulpes parvulas, que demoliuntur vineas Domini, ed. B. Delmaire, “Heresis” 17, 1991, p. 10–13.en
dc.referencesAlberici Monachii Trium Fontium Chronicon, ed. P. Scheffer-Boichorst, Hannoverae 1874 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 23].en
dc.referencesAnatemy z Palei historycznej, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].en
dc.referencesLa chanson de la croisade albigeoise, vol. I, ed. E. Martin-Chabot, Paris 1931.en
dc.referencesCharte de Niquinta, antipape des heretiques surnommés d’Albigeois, ed. D. Zbiral, [in:] 1209–2009 Cathares. Une histoire à pacifier?, ed. A. Brenon, Loubatieres 2010.en
dc.referencesCosmas the Priest, The Discours against Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].en
dc.referencesDe heresi catharorum in Lombardia, ed. A. Dondaine, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 19, 1949, p. 306–312.en
dc.referencesEckbertus Abbas Schonaugensis, Sermones contra catharos, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. CXCV, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1855.en
dc.referencesÉtienne de Bourbon, Anecdotes historiques, légendes et apologues, ed. A. Lecoy de La Marche, Paris 1877.en
dc.referencesEuthymius of the Periblepton, A letter, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].en
dc.referencesEuthymius Zigabenus, Panoplia dogmatica, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, vol. CXXX, ed. J.P. Migne, Paris 1886.en
dc.referencesEutymiusz Tyrnowski, Żywot Świętego Hilariona Megleńskiego, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczneen
dc.referencesna Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].en
dc.referencesInnocentius IV, Inquisitoribus Lombardiae, ut Roberto haeretico debitam poenam imponant, effodiant e terra haereticorum ossa, eaque, necnon quoddam castrum ac domos exurant, vol. I, ed. T. Rippol, Bullarium Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum, Roma 1729.en
dc.referencesInterrogatio Iohannis, [in:] Le livre secret des cathares. Interrogatio Iohannis. Edition critique, traduction commentaire, ed. et trans. E. Bozoky, Paris 2009.en
dc.referencesJan Egzarcha, Heksameron, [in:] Średniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].en
dc.referencesKsięga Henocha słowiańska, [in:] Apokryfy Starego Testamentu, ed. R. Rubinkiewicz, Warszawa 1999.en
dc.referencesManifestatio haeresis albigensium et lugdunensium, ed. A. Cazenave, [in:] Die Mächte des Guten und Bösen. Vorstellungen im XII. u. XIII. Jahrhundert über ihr Wirken in der Heilsgeschichte, ed. A. Zimmermann, Berlin 1977 [= Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 11].en
dc.referencesMatthaeus Parisiensis, Chronica Maiora, ed. F. Liebermann, Hannoverae 1888 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 28].en
dc.referencesMichael Psellos, De daemonum energia seu operatione, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, vol. CXXII, ed. J.P. Migne, Paris 1889.en
dc.referencesMoneta de Cremona, Adversus Catharos et Valdenses libri quinque, ed. T.A. Ricchini, Roma 1743.en
dc.referencesO Morzu Tyberiadzkim, ed., trans. A. Kawecka, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.en
dc.referencesPetrus Vallium Sarnaii Monachus, Hystoria Albigensis, vol. I, ed. P. Guebin, E. Lyon, Paris 1926.en
dc.referencesRituel, ed. Ch. Thouzellier, [in:] Ch. Thouzellier, Rituel cathare, Paris 1977 [= Sources chrétiennes, 236].en
dc.referencesRituel Provencal, ed. L. Cledat, [in:] L. Cledat, Le nouveau testament. Traduit au XIIIe siècle en langue provençale suivi d’un rituel cathare, Geneve 1968.en
dc.referencesRoberti Autissiodorensis Chronicon, ed. O. Holder-Egger, Hannoverae 1882 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores, 26].en
dc.referencesSłowo o Adamie i Ewie, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.en
dc.referencesSumma Fratris Raineri de ordine fratrum praedicatorum, de Catharis et Pauperibus de Lugduno, [in:] Un Traité Neo-Manicheen du 13 siècle, Le Liber de duobus principiis suivi d’un fragment de Rituel Cathare, ed. A. Dondaine, Roma 1939.en
dc.referencesSummula contra hereticos. Un traite contre les cathares du XIIIeme siecle, ed. J. Duvernoy, http://jean.duvernoy.free.fr/text/pdf/summula.pdf [3 V 2023].en
dc.referencesThe Synodikon of Tsar Boril Against The Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].en
dc.referencesTheophylact Lecapenus, To Peter, King of Bulgaria about The Bogomils, [in:] Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c.650–c.1450, trans. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, Manchester–New York 2013 [= Manchester Medieval Sources].en
dc.referencesTractatus de Hereticis, ed. A. Dondaine, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 20, 1950, p. 308–324.en
dc.referencesThe Vision of Isaiah, [in:] Heresies of the High Middle Ages, trans. W.L. Wakefield, A.P. Evans, New York–London 1969.en
dc.referencesAcerbi A., La Visione di Isaia nelle vicende dottrinali del catarismo lombardo e provenzale, “Cristianesimo nella storia” 1, 1980, p. 75–122.en
dc.referencesBadalanova Geller F., The Sea of Tiberias: Between Apocryphal Literature and Oral Tradition, [in:] The Old Testament Apocrypha in the Slavonic Tradition. Continuity and Diversity, ed. L. di Tommaso, Ch. Böttrich, Tübingen 2011, p. 13–23.en
dc.referencesBesse G., Histoire de ducs, marquis et comtes de Narbonne, Paris 1660.en
dc.referencesBiget J.L., L’histoire du « catharisme » occitan: un noeud de questions, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 13–34, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2422en
dc.referencesBiget J.L., Les bons hommes sont-ils les fils des bogomiles? Examen critique d’une idée reçue, “Slavica Occitania” 16, 2003, p. 133–188.en
dc.referencesBiget J.L., Réflexions sur « l’hérésie » dans le Midi de la France au Moyen Âge, “Heresis” 36–37, 2001, p. 29–74, 294–295.en
dc.referencesBiget J.L., Retour sur le « concile de Sant-Félix », [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 81–110, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2426en
dc.referencesBiget J.L., Un faux du XIIIe siècle? Examen d’une hypothèse, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 105–133, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00008en
dc.referencesBorst A., Die Katharer, Stuttgart 1953.en
dc.referencesBozoky E., Circulation et portée de l’apocryphe Interrogatio Iohannis, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 65–80, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2425en
dc.referencesBozoky E., Le livre secret des cathares. Un lien entre l’orient et l’Occident, “Slavica Occitania” 16, 2003, p. 199–205.en
dc.referencesBrunn U., Cathari, catharistae et cataphrygae. Ancetres des cathares du XII siècle, “Heresis” 36–37, 2002, p. 183–200.en
dc.referencesBrunn U., Des contestataires aux “Cathares”: discours de réforme et propagande antihérétique dans les pays du Rhin et de la Meuse avant l’Inquisition, Paris 2006.en
dc.referencesCompte rendu des interventions de M. Zerner, J.-L. Biget et J. Chiffoleau, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 37–56, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00006en
dc.referencesDalarun J., Dufour A., Grondeux A., Muzerelle D., Zinelli F., La ‘charte de Niquinta’, analyse formelle, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 135–201, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00009en
dc.referencesDondaine A., La hiérarchie cathare en Italie I, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 19, 1949, p. 280–312.en
dc.referencesDondaine A., La hiérarchie cathare en Italie II, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 20, 1950, p. 234–324.en
dc.referencesDossat Y., A propos du concile de Saint-Félix: Les Milingues, “Cahiers de Fanjeaux” 3, 1968, p. 201–214, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.1968.945en
dc.referencesDrakopoulos T., L’unité de Bogomilo-Catharisme d’après quatre textes latins analysés à la lumière des sources byzantines, Geneve 2010.en
dc.referencesDuvernoy J., Catharisme. La religion des cathares, Toulouse 1979.en
dc.referencesDuvernoy J., Le catharisme. L’histoire des cathares, Toulouse 1979.en
dc.referencesHamilton B., The Cathar Council of Saint-Felix Reconsidered, “Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum” 48, 1978, p. 23–53.en
dc.referencesHamilton B., The Origins of the Dualist Church of Drugunthia, “Eastern Churches Review” 6, 1974, p. 115–124.en
dc.referencesInventer l’hérésie? Discours polémiques et pouvoirs avant l’Inquisition, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 1998.en
dc.referencesIvanov J., Livres et legendes bogomiles. Aux Sources du Catharisme, Paris 1976.en
dc.referencesJiménez P., Relire la charte de Niquinta I: Etude et portée de la charte, “Heresis” 22, 1994, p. 1–26.en
dc.referencesJiménez-Sanchez P., Les catharismes. Modèles dissidents du christianisme médiéval (XIIe–XIIIe siècles), Rennes 2008, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.3688en
dc.referencesde Jonge M., Tromp J., The Life of Adam and Eve and Related Literature, Sheffield 1997.en
dc.referencesde Lacger L., L’albigeois pendant la crise de l’albigéisme, “Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique” 29, 1933, p. 272–315, 586–633, 849–904.en
dc.referencesLe livre secret des cathares. Interrogatio Iohannis. Edition critique, traduction commentaire, ed. Et trans. E. Bozoky, Paris 2009.en
dc.referencesMyszor W., Średniowieczna religijność ludowa. Dualizm w świetle Interrogatio Iohannis, “Studia Religiologica” 41, 2008, p. 11–19.en
dc.referencesNew Perspectives on 2 Enoch, ed. A.A. Orlov, G. Boccaccini, Leiden–Boston 2012.en
dc.referencesObolensky D., The Bogomils, Cambridge 1948.en
dc.referencesOrlov A.A., From Apocalypticism to Merkabah Mysticism. Studies in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha, Leiden 2007 [= Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, 114], https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154391.i-488en
dc.referencesPegg M.G., Le catharisme en questions: falsifiabilité, vérité historique et une nouvelle histoire du christianisme medieval, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 331–371, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2439en
dc.referencesPegg M.G., The Paradigm of Catharism; or, the Historians’ Illusions, [in:] Cathars in Question, ed. A. Sennis, York 2016 [= Heresy and Inquisition in the Middle Ages], p. 21–52.en
dc.referencesRoche J., Enjeux et embûches de la recherche actuelle sur le catharisme: l’exemple de la charte de Nicétas, [in:] Autour de Montaillou, un village occitan. Histoire et religiosité d’une communauté villageoise au Moyen Age. Actes du colloque de Montaillou, 25–26–27 août 2000, ed. A. Brenon, Ch. Dieulafait, E. Le Roy Ladurie, Castelnaud-la-Chapelle 2001, p. 75–117.en
dc.referencesRoche J., Une Église cathare. L’évêché du Carcassès, Carcassonne-Béziers-Narbonne, Cahors 2005.en
dc.referencesSaldzhiev H., On the Prehistory of Bogomilism – The Historical and Religious Continuum of the Dualistic Groups in Early Medieval Bulgaria (8th–10th Century), “Studia Ceranea” 11, 2021, p. 721–761, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.11.38en
dc.referencesSłowo o widzeniu Barucha, kiedy to anioł, posłany na świętą górę zwaną Syjonem, płakał nad zniewoleniem Jerozolimy, [in:] Apokryfy i legendy starotestamentowe Słowian południowych, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, Kraków 2006.en
dc.referencesStoyanov Y., Medieval Christian Dualist Perceptions and Conceptions of Biblical Paradise, “Studia Ceranea” 3, 2013, p. 149–166, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.11en
dc.referencesStoyanov Y., The Debate on Medieval Western Christian Dualism through the Prism of Slavonic Pseudepigrapha, “Scrinium” 14, 2018, p. 334–350, https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00141P23en
dc.referencesŚredniowieczne herezje dualistyczne na Bałkanach. Źródła słowiańskie, ed. G. Minczew, M. Skowronek, J.M. Wolski, Łódź 2015 [= Series Ceranea, 1].en
dc.referencesThéry J., L’hérésie des bons hommes. Comment nommer la dissidence religieuse non vaudoise ni béguine en Languedoc (XIIe – début XIVe siècle)?, “Heresis” 36–37, 2002, p. 297–298.en
dc.referencesTrivellone A., Des Églises cathares en Italie? Pour une étude critique des sources italiennes, [in:] Le « catharisme » en questions, ed. J.L. Biget, S. Caucanas, M. Fournié, D. Le Blévec, Fanjeaux 2020, p. 37–63, https://doi.org/10.3406/cafan.2020.2424en
dc.referencesTurdeanu E., Apocryphes slaves et roumains de l’Ancien Testament, Leiden 1981 [= Studia in veteris testamenti pseudepigrapha, 5], https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004675506en
dc.referencesWakefield W.L., Evans A.P., Heresies of the High Middle Ages, New York–London 1969.en
dc.referencesZbiral D., La Charte de Niquinta et le rassemblement de Saint-Félix: État de la question, [in:] 1209–2009 Cathares. Une histoire à pacifier?, ed. A. Brenon, Loubatieres 2010.en
dc.referencesZbiral D., Největší hereze. Dualismus, učenecká vyprávění o katarství a budování křesťanské Evropy, Brno 2007.en
dc.referencesZerner M., La charte de Niquinta, l’hérésie et l’érudition des années 1650–1660, [in:] L’Histoire du catharisme en discussion. Le « concile » de Saint-Félix 1167, ed. M. Zerner, Nice 2001 [= Collection d’études médiévales de Nice, 3], p. 203–248, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.CEM-EB.4.00010en
dc.contributor.authorEmailpiotr.czarnecki@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.13.43
dc.relation.volume13


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
99-123_Czarnecki.pdf
Rozmiar:
266.8KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0