Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSchreiner, Laura
dc.contributor.authorKastrup, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Jochen
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T19:43:58Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T19:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-16
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/50265
dc.description.abstractIn 2017, it was decided that the United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace (UNOSDP) is to be closed. This qualitative study aims to analyse the reasons for the closure as well as its effects on Sport for Development and Peace (SDP) in the United Nations. Against the background of the systems theory, we conducted interviews with participants from relevant organisations. It is shown that the way the UNOSDP worked underwent a change and that the new tasks as well as their fulfilment were viewed controversially. Additionally, broader changes in development policy set a new frame for SDP.en
dc.description.abstractW 2017 r. podjęto decyzję o zamknięciu Biura Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Sportu na rzecz Rozwoju i Pokoju (UNOSDP). Niniejsze badanie jakościowe ma na celu przeanalizowanie przyczyn zamknięcia, a także jego wpływu na rolę sportu w aspekcie rozwoju i pokoju w Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych. Opierając się na teorii systemów, przeprowadziliśmy wywiady z uczestnikami z odpowiednich organizacji. Wykazano, że Biuro NZ ds. Sportu na rzecz Rozwoju i Pokoju zmieniło tryb pracy, a nowo wyznaczone zadania, jak również ich realizacja, wzbudzały kontrowersje. Ponadto, szerzej zakrojone zmiany w polityce rozwojowej wytyczyły nowe ramy dla krzewienia idei sportu na rzecz rozwoju i pokoju.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectsport for development and peaceen
dc.subjectUnited Nationsen
dc.subjectsystems theoryen
dc.subjectUnited Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peaceen
dc.subjectorganisational structuresen
dc.subjectsport na rzecz rozwoju i pokojupl
dc.subjectOrganizacja Narodów Zjednoczonychpl
dc.subjectteoria systemówpl
dc.subjectBiuro ONZ ds. Sportu na rzecz Rozwoju i Pokojupl
dc.subjectstruktury organizacyjnepl
dc.titleSport for Development and Peace in the United Nations: An Empirical Study on the Development of the Role of SDP in the UN in the Context of the Closure of the UNOSDPen
dc.title.alternativeSport na rzecz rozwoju i pokoju w Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych Empiryczne badanie poświęcone rozwojowi roli sportu na rzecz rozwoju w ONZ w kontekście zamknięcia Biura NZ ds. Sportu na rzecz Rozwoju i Pokojupl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number85-102
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSchreiner, Laura - Bielefeld University, Department of Sports Scienceen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKastrup, Valerie - Bielefeld University, Department of Sports Scienceen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMayer, Jochen - University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Department of Sports and Exerciseen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.referencesBardocz-Bencsik, M., Doczi, T. “Mapping Sport for Development and Peace as Bourdieu’s Field”. Physical Culture & Sport. Studies & Research, 81.1 (2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2019-0001en
dc.referencesBeutler, I. “Sport Serving Development and Peace: Achieving the Goals of the United Nations Through Sport”. Sport in Society, 11.4 (2008): 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802019227en
dc.referencesBorggrefe, C., Cachay, K., Riedl, L. Spitzensport Und Studium. Eine Organisationssoziologische Studie Zum Problem Dualer Karrieren. Schorndorf: Hofmann, 2009.en
dc.referencesCoalter, F. “The Politics of Sport-for-Development: Limited Focus Programmes and Broad Gauge Problems?”. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45.3 (2010): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210366791en
dc.referencesCollison, H., Darnell, S., Giulianotti, R., Howe, D. “Sport for Social Change and Development: Sustaining Transnational Partnerships and Adapting International Curriculums to Local Contexts in Rwanda”. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 33.15 (2016): 1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1318850en
dc.referencesCollison, H., et al. Routledge Handbook of Sport for Development and Peace. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.en
dc.references“Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases”. UN 2017. Web. 22.06.2019. https://www.un.org/press/en/2017/db170504.doc.htmen
dc.referencesGiulianotti, R. “The Sport, Development and Peace Sector: A Model of Four Social Policy Domains”. Journal of Social Policy, 40.4 (2011): 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279410000930en
dc.referencesGläser, J., Laudel, G. Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. 4. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91538-8en
dc.references“Intergovernmental Committee for Physical Education and Sport (CIGEPS)”. UNESCO 2020 6.01.2021. Web. 15.02.2021. https://en.unesco.org/themes/sport-and-anti-doping/cigepsen
dc.referencesKidd, B. “A New Social Movement: Sport for Development and Peace”. Sport in Society, 11.4 (2008): 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802019268en
dc.referencesKühl, S. Organisationen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93185-2en
dc.referencesLevermore, R., Beacom, A. “Reassessing Sport-for-Development: Moving Beyond ‘Mapping the Territory’”. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4.1 (2012): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.627362en
dc.referencesLindsey, I. “Governance in sport-for-development: Problems and possibilities of (not) learning from international development”. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52.7 (2017): 801–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215623460en
dc.referencesLindsey, I., and Grattan, A. “An ‘International Movement’? Decentring Sport-for-Development Within Zambian Communities”. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4.1 (2011): 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.627360en
dc.referencesLuhmann, N. Die Politik Der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000.en
dc.referencesLuhmann, N. Schriften Zur Organisation 2. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23210-8_12en
dc.referencesLuhmann, N. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984.en
dc.referencesMayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen Und Techniken. 11., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim [u.a.]: Beltz Verlagsgruppe, 2010.en
dc.references“Office of the Spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General”. Highlight 4 May 2017. 26.06.2018. Web. 3.06.2020. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/highlight/2017-05-04.htmlen
dc.referencesPeachey, J.W., Musser, A., Shin, N.R., Cohen, A.. “Interrogating the Motivations of Sport for Development and Peace Practitioners”. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53.7 (2018): 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216686856en
dc.referencesSchreiner, L. Regierungsorganisationen als machtvolle Führungsinstanzen des „Sport for Development and Peace“ – Feldes? Empirische Analysen zur Nutzung des Sports in der Entwicklungspolitik der United Nations und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld, 2023.en
dc.referencesSchulenkorf, N., Spaaij, R.. “Commentary: Reflections on Theory Building in Sport for Development and Peace”. International Journal of Sport Management & Marketingarketing, 16.1/2 (2015): 71–77.en
dc.referencesSchulenkorf, N., Sugden, J., Burdsey, D. “Sport for Development and Peace as Contested Terrain: Place, Community, Ownership”. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6.3 (2014): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.825875en
dc.references“Secretary-General Appoints Wilfried Lemke of Germany as Special Adviser on Sport for Development and Peace”. UN 2008. Web. 12.11.2019. https://www.un.org/press/en/2008/sga1128.doc.htmen
dc.referencesSherry, E., Schulenkorf, N., Seal, E., Nicholson, M., Hoye, R. “Sport-for-Development in the South Pacific Region: Macro-, Meso-, and Micro-Perspectives”. Sociology of Sport Journal, 34 (2017): 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2017-0022en
dc.referencesSvensson, P.G., Levine, J. “Rethinking Sport for Development and Peace: The Capability Approach”. Sport in Society, 20.7 (2017): 905–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2016.1269083en
dc.referencesThiel, A. Steuerung Im Organisierten Sport: Ansätze Und Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Naglschmid, 1997. Sozialwissenschaften Des Sports 4.en
dc.referencesThiel, A., Tangen, J.O. “Niklas Luhmann, System Theory and Sport”. In: Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Sport. Ed. Richard Giulianotti. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2015. 72–82. Routledge International Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203404065-10en
dc.referencesThiel, A., Mayer, J. “Characteristics of Voluntary Sports Clubs Management: A Sociological Perspective”. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9.1 (2009): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740802461744en
dc.referencesThiel, A., Seiberth, K., Mayer, J. Sportsoziologie: Ein Lehrbuch in 13 Lektionen. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Verlag, 2013. Sportwissenschaft studieren Band 8.en
dc.references“Third UNOSDP Youth Leadership Camp (YLC)”. Sportanddev.org 2012. Web. 6.06.2020. https://www.sportanddev.org/en/event/third-unosdp-youth-leadership-camp-ylcen
dc.referencesTinaz, C., Knott, B. “Sport and Development in Emerging Nations”. In: Routledge Research in Sport Politics and Policy. Ed. J. Grix, L. Chalip, B. Houlihan. London–New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.en
dc.referencesUN General Assembly. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1., 2015.en
dc.referencesUNOSDP. Annual Report 2015. 2016. Web. https://www.un.org/sport/sites/www.un.org.sport/files/ckfiles/files/UNOSDP_Annual_Report_2015%20(1).pdfen
dc.referencesvan Luijk, N. “The International Olympic Committee: A United Nations Permanent Observer of post-politics?”. International Area Studies Review 21.2 (2018): 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918761110en
dc.referencesWagner, U., Storm, R.K., Hoberman, J.M. Observing Sport: Modern System Theoretical Approaches. Schorndorf: Hofmann, 2010. Reihe Sportsoziologie.en
dc.referencesWalgenbach, P. “Neoinstitutionalistische Ansätze in Der Organisationstheorie”. In: Organisationstheorien. Ed. A. Kieser, M. Ebers. 7., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 2014: 295–345.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailSchreiner, Laura - laura.schreiner@uni-bielefeld.de
dc.contributor.authorEmailKastrup, Valerie - valerie.kastrup@uni-bielefeld.de
dc.contributor.authorEmailMayer, Jochen - jochen.mayer@ph-gmuend.de
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.29.06
dc.relation.volume29


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0