Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Impact of learning city networks on multi-level urban development and transformation processes

dc.contributor.authorJonas, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMueller, André
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T07:55:03Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T07:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-24
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/49938
dc.description.abstractLearning city networks are real-time laboratories related to national and local urban development policies. In order to support learning city networks, the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) together with the Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building (BMWSB), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), and partner cities have developed and further enhanced the multi-level D4UC (Dialogues for Urban Change) Method since 2012. This method makes an international exchange on the specificities of urban transformation processes, based on purposeful projects, possible for participating cities. The article discusses methods and lessons learned and is framed within a theoretical background of learning networks.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjecturban laboratoriesen
dc.subjectmulti-level governanceen
dc.subjectD4UC methoden
dc.titleImpact of learning city networks on multi-level urban development and transformation processesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number91-105
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJonas, Andrea - Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR), Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR), Division Urban Development, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMueller, André - Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR), Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR), Division European (and International) Spatial and Urban Development; University of Bonn, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Geographyen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesBARBER, B. (2013), If mayors ruled the world. Dysfunctional nations and rising cities, New Haven: Yale University Press.en
dc.referencesBBSR – BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR BAU-, STADT- UND RAUMFORSCHUNG (2023), Density and mixed-use: Innovative approaches to redensification in German and American cities, Research Project, https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/EN/research/programs/ExWoSt/Studies/density-mixed-used/01-start.html;jsessionid=FCE688CBB91481DBBBFBB8BA2187F084.live21323 [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesBBSR – BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR BAU-, STADT- UND RAUMFORSCHUNG (2020), The New Leipzig Charter: Synthesis and focus. Empowering cities to act in pursuit of the common good, documentation of work progress and presentation of results.en
dc.referencesBMWSB – BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR WOHNEN, STADTENTWICKLUNG UND BAUWESEN / BBSR – BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR BAU-, STADT- UND RAUMFORSCHUNG (2023), Dialogues for Urban Change, https://www.nationale-stadtentwicklungspolitik.de/NSPWeb/EN/Projects/D4UC/d4uc_node.html [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesBMI – BUNDESMINISTERIUM DES INNERN, FÜR BAU UND HEIMAT (2020), Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the EU: New Leipzig Charter for urban development adopted. 30. November 2020, https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/pressemitteilungen/EN/2020/12/newleipzig-charter.html [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesCHETTY, R., JACKSON, M. O. and KUCHLER, T. et al. (2022), ‘Social capital I: measurement and associations with economic mobility’, Nature, 608, pp. 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4en
dc.referencesDEUTSCHER BUNDESTAG (2015), ‘Leitlinien der Bundesregierung zur internationalen Zusammenarbeit für nachhaltige Urbanisierung – Partner in einer Welt der Städte’, Drucksache 18/4924 des Deutschen Bundestags.en
dc.referencesEHLICHMAN, D. and SAWYER, D. (2018), ‘Learn Before You Leap: The Catalytic Power of a Learning Network’, Stanford Social Innovation Review. DOI: 10.48558/813x-nk18en
dc.referencesG7 GERMANY (2022a), ‘Ministerial Meeting on Sustainable Urban Development’, Communiqué. 13 September 2022, https://www.bmwsb.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/Webs/BMWSB/DE/veroeffentlichungen/termine/communique-g7.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesG7 GERMANY (2022b), Joining forces to make cities liveable, G7 Ministers’ Meeting on Urban Development, https://www.g7germany.de/g7-en/news/g7-articles/g7-urban-development-ministers-2125542 [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesGMF – GERMAN MARSHALL FUND (2019), Dialogues for Change 3.0, a U.S.-German Cities Exchange for Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development 2016–2018, https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/Dialogues%20for%20Change.pdf [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesGMF – GERMAN MARSHALL FUND (2016), Civic Engagement Principles for Transatlantic Cities: Inspiration from the Dialogues for Change Initiative 2013–2015, https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/D4C%25202016.pdf [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesHAMBLETON, R. (2020), ‘From «Best Practice» to «Relevant Practice» in International Cityto-City Learning’, [in:] VAN DEN DOOL, L. (d.) (2020), Strategies for Urban Network Learning. International Practices and Theoretical Reflections, Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_3en
dc.referencesHUD – US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (2023a), HUD Policy Areas, https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/policy-areas/#community-and-economic-development [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesHUD – US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (2023b), Six Livability Principles, https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/economic_development/Six_Livability_Principles [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesMUELLER, A. (2016), Intercultural Impulses for Urban Development in Germany. D4C Method, BBSR-Analysen KOMPAKT 02/2016, urn:nbn:de:101:1-201610274577.en
dc.referencesMUELLER, A. (2013), ‘Ein Kommentar zum Memorandum «Städtische Energien – Zukunftsaufgaben der Städte»’, [in:] RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY (ed.) (2013), Schwerpunkt Integrierte Stadtentwicklungspolitik, pnd online 1/2013, https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/570510/files/PND%202013%2C1.pdf [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesNESTI, G. (2018), ‘Co-production for innovation. The urban living lab experience’, Policy and Society, 37 (3), pp. 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692en
dc.referencesOECD (2017), National Urban Policy in OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264271906-enen
dc.referencesRICHE, C., AUBIN, D. and MOYSON, S. (2020), ‘Too much of a good thing? A systematic review about the conditions of learning in governance networks’, European Policy Analysis, 7 (1), pp. 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1080en
dc.referencesSCHAAP, L. and VAN DEN DOO, L. (2020), ‘Introduction: Studying for urban network Learning’, [in:] VAN DEN DOOL, L. (ed.), Strategies for Urban Network Learning. International Practices and Theoretical Reflections, Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_1en
dc.referencesSIMONS, P. R. J. and RUIJTERS, M. (2004), ‘Learning Professionals: Towards an Integrated Model’, [in:] BOSHUIZEN, H. and BROMME, R. (eds), Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert, pp. 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2094-5_11en
dc.referencesVAN DEN DOOL, L. and SCHAAP, L. (2020), ‘Learning Processes in an Urban Governance Context: A theoretical Exploration’, [in:] VAN DEN DOOL, L. (ed.) (2020), Strategies for Urban Network Learning. International Practices and Theoretical Reflections, Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_2en
dc.referencesWEBER, E. P. and KHADEMIAN, A. M. (2008), ‘Wicked problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings’, [in:] Public Administration Review, March/April 2008, pp. 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.xen
dc.referencesWBGU – GERMAN ADVISORY COUNCIL ON GLOBAL CHANGE (2016), Humanity on the move: Unlocking the transformative power of cities, Berlin.en
dc.referencesUN DESA – UNITED NATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, POPULATION DIVISION (2018), World Urbanization Prospects. The 2018 Revision, https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesUNITED NATIONS, GENERAL ASSEMBLY (2017), New Urban Agenda, resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 December 2016, A/RES/71/256-EN, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/858344?ln=es [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.referencesUNITED NATIONS, UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION (2015), The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, https://www.undrr.org/implementing-sendai-framework/what-sendai-framework [accessed on: 17.03.2023].en
dc.contributor.authorEmailJonas, Andrea - andrea.jonas@bbr.bund.de
dc.contributor.authorEmailMueller, André - andre.mueller@bbr.bund.de
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.30.2.07
dc.relation.volume30


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
91-105_Jonas,_Mueller.pdf
Rozmiar:
488.3KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0