Pokaż uproszczony rekord

AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland

dc.contributor.authorFeltynowski, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorRzeńca, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorRzeńca, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorWróblewski, Wiktor
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T10:35:09Z
dc.date.available2023-12-11T10:35:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/48712
dc.description.abstractUrban parks are significant elements that improve the quality of life in built-up areas. This research aims to identify the most attractive park in Lodz, Poland, using a set of assessment indicators. In our opinion, the decision-making process in assessing the attractiveness of urban parks may be assisted by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Two methods were chosen from the MCDA group, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research shows that the proposed methods reveal which park needs support and calls for investment.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjecturban parksen
dc.subjectpark attractivenessen
dc.subjecturban amenitiesen
dc.subjectthe AHP and TOPSIS methodsen
dc.titleAHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Polanden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number145-169
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFeltynowski, Marcin - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, ul. POW 3/5, 90-255 Łódź, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRzeńca, Agnieszka - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, ul. POW 3/5, 90-255 Łódź, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRzeńca, Piotr - Office of Spatial Planning of the Lodz Voivodship, al. Piłsudskiego 12, 90-051 Łódź, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWróblewski, Wiktor - Lodz University of Technology, Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, ul. Stefana Żeromskiego 116, 90-543 Łódź, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesAZIMIFARD, A., MOOSAVIRAD, S. H. and ARIAFAR, S. (2018), ‘Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran’s steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods’, Resources Policy, 57, pp. 30−44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.002en
dc.referencesBAYCAN-LEVENT, T., VREEKER, R. and NIJKAMP, P. (2009), ‘A Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Green Spaces in European Cities’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 16 (2), pp. 193−213.en
dc.referencesBERDIE, A. D., OSACI, M., MUSCALAGIU, I. and BARZ, C. (2017), ‘A combined approach of AHP and TOPSIS methods applied in the field of integrated software systems’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 200. https://10.1088/1757-899X/200/1/012041en
dc.referencesBIERNACKA, M. and KRONENBERG, J. (2018), ‘Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces’, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 36, pp. 22−33. https://10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007en
dc.referencesCHEN, W. Y. and WANG, D. T. (2013), ‘Economic development and natural amenity: An econometric analysis of urban green spaces in China’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, pp. 435−442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.08.004en
dc.referencesCHENG, A. S. and MATTOR, K. M. (2006), ‘Why won’t they come? Stakeholder perspectives on collaborative national forest planning by participation level’, Environmental Management, 38, pp. 545−561.en
dc.referencesCZEMBROWSKI, P. and KRONENBERG, J. (2016), ‘Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 146, pp. 11−19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005en
dc.referencesCZEMBROWSKI, P., KRONENBERG, J. and CZEPKIEWICZ, M. (2016), ‘Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing’, Ecological Economics, 130, pp. 166−175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.004en
dc.referencesde GROOT, R. S., WILSON, M. A. and BOUMANS, R. M. J. (2002), ‘A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services’, Ecological Economics, 41, pp. 393−408.en
dc.referencesDEGÓRSKA, B. and DEGÓRSKI, M. (2017), ‘Green Infrastructure as a Very Important Quality Factor in Urban Areas - Warsaw Case Study’, Europa XXI, 32, pp. 51−70.en
dc.referencesDENG, H., YEH, Ch. H. and WILLIS, R. J. (2000), ‘Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights’, Computers & Operations Research, 27 (10), pp. 963−973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6en
dc.referencesDONAHUE, M. L., KEELER, B. L., WOOD, S. A., FISHER, D. M., HAMPSTEAD, Z. A. and MCPHERSON, T. (2018), ‘Using social media to understand drivers of urban park visitation in the Twin Cities, MN’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, pp. 1−10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.006en
dc.referencesFELTYNOWSKI, M. (2023), ‘Urban green spaces in land-use policy – types of data, sources of data and staff – the case of Poland’, Land Use Policy, 127, 106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106570en
dc.referencesGLAESER, E. L., KOLKO, J. and SAIZ, A. (2001), ‘Consumer city’, Journal of Economic Geography, 1 (1), pp. 27−50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.27en
dc.referencesGLAESER, E. L., KOLKO, J. and SAIZ, A. (2003), ‘Consumers and Cities’, Research in Urban Policy, 9, pp. 177−183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3520(03)09005-6en
dc.referencesGRAY, J.and LÄMMERHIRT, D.(2017), Data And The City: New report on how public data is fostering civic engagement in urban regions, Cambridge: St John’s Innovation Centre.en
dc.referencesGUILFORD, J.P.(1942), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.en
dc.referencesGUO, S., YANG, G., PEI, T., MA, T., SONG, C., SHU, H., DU, Y. and ZHOU, Ch. (2019), ‘Analysis of factors affecting urban park service area in Beijing: Perspectives from multi-source geographic data’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, pp. 103−117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.016en
dc.referencesHANINE, M., BOUTKHOUM, O., TIKNIOUINE, A. and AGOUTI, T. (2016), ‘Application of an integrated multicriteria decision making AHPTOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection’, Springer Plus, 5, p.263. https://10.1186/s40064-016-1888-zen
dc.referencesHUANG, J. (2008), ‘Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection’, 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2008.4670971en
dc.referencesHWANG, Ch.L.and YOON, K.(1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. A State of the Art Survey, New York: Springer-Verlag.en
dc.referencesKITCHIN, R.(2014), The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, London: SAGE Publications.en
dc.referencesKOBRYŃ, A. (2014), Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenią, Warszawa: Difin.en
dc.referencesMARKUSEN, A. (2006), ‘Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists’, Environment and Planning A, 38 (10), pp. 1921−1940. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38179en
dc.referencesMCNEUR, C. (2016), ‘Parks, People, and Property Values: The Changing Role of Green Spaces in Antebellum Manhattan’, Journal of Planning History, 16 (2), pp. 98−111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513216657563en
dc.referencesMEEROW, S. and NEWELL, J. P. (2017), ‘Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, pp. 62−75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005en
dc.referencesMENKE, P. (2016), ‘Grüne Infrastruktur – Konzepte und Strategien zur Förderung eines Bewusstseins für den Wert von Stadtgrün’, Standort, 40 (2), pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-016-0424-2en
dc.referencesMILLER, G. A. (1994), ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’, Psychological Review, 101 (2), pp. 343–352.en
dc.referencesNILSSON, H., NORDSTRÖM, E. M. and ÖHMAN, K. (2016), ‘Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS’, Forests, 7 (5), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100en
dc.referencesNORDSTRÖM, E. M., ERIKSSON, L. O. and ÖHMAN, K. (2010), ‘Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden’, Forest Policy and Economics, 12, pp. 562−574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006en
dc.referencesOLEKSIEJUK, E.and JANKOWSKA, A.(2007), Zieleń miejska – naturalne bogactwo miasta. Lasy w miastach Unii Europejskiej – zasady gospodarowania i ochrona, Toruń: Polskie Zrzeszenie Inżynierów i Techników Sanitarnych Oddział Toruń.en
dc.referencesONDER, E. and DAG, S. (2013), ‘Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Approaches for Supplier Selection in a Cable Company’, Journal of Business, Economics & Finance, 2 (2), pp. 56−74.en
dc.referencesÖNÜT, S. and SONER, S. (2008), ‘Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment’, Waste Management 28 (9), pp. 1552−1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019en
dc.referencesOZTURK, D. and BATUK, F. (2011), ‘Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for Spatial Decision Problems’, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/Gi4DM/PDF/PP12.pdf [accessed on: 27.02.2022].en
dc.referencesPIETRZYK-KASZYŃSKA, A., CZEPKIEWICZ, M. and KRONENBERG, J. (2017), ‘Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, pp. 85−95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012en
dc.referencesPODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A., PRZYWOJSKA, J. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2022), ‘A Public Value-Based, Multilevel Evaluation Framework to Examine Public Bike-Sharing Systems. Implications for Cities’ Sustainable Transport Policies’, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 23 (2), pp. 180−194. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2022-0016en
dc.referencesPODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2021), ‘Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9 (2), pp. 651−662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003.en
dc.referencesPRAKASH, Ch. and BARUA, M. K. (2015), ‘Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment’, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, pp. 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.001en
dc.referencesPublic Space Charter (in Polish: Karta Przestrzeni Publicznej) (2009). http://www.tup.org.pl/down-load/KartaPrzestrzeniPublicznej.pdf [accessed on: 10.01.2022].en
dc.referencesROKHSARI, S. and SADEGHI-NIARAKI, A. (2015), ‘Urban Network Risk Assessment Based on Data Fusion Concept using Fuzzy-AHP, TOPSIS and VIKOR in GIS Environment’, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 6 (2), pp. 73−86.en
dc.referencesSAATY, T.L.and VARGAS, L.G.(2012), Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: Springer.en
dc.referencesSAATY, T.L.(1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill.en
dc.referencesSAATY, T. L. (2007), ‘Multi-decisions decision-making: In addition to wheeling and dealing, our national political bodies need a formal approach for prioritization’, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, pp. 1001−1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.023en
dc.referencesSAATY, T. L. (2008), ‘Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process’, International Journal Services Sciences, 1 (1), pp. 83−98.en
dc.referencesSAATY, T.L.and KEARNS, K.P.(1985), Analytical Planning. The Organization of System, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.en
dc.referencesSENDZIMIR FOUNDATION, A Report From the Project ‘Count on Green’. https://uslugiekosystemow.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/report_count_on_green.pdf [accessed on: 20.01.2022].en
dc.referencesSOKOŁOWICZ, M. (2017), ‘Udogodnienia miejskie – element publicznego wymiaru zasobów mieszkaniowych’, Folia Oeconomica Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, 6 (332), pp. 125−142. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.332.09en
dc.referencesTOŁWIŃSKI, T. (1963), Urbanistyka. Tom III Zieleń w urbanistyce, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en
dc.referencesWRÓBLEWSKI, W. and KROC, T. (2022), ‘Współczesne podejście do terenów zieleni w mieście a ich utrzymanie i rozwój w Łodzi’, Builder, 294 (1), pp. 9−11. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.5802en
dc.referencesXIAO, Y., LI, Z. and WEBSTER, Ch. (2016), ‘Estimating the mediating effect of privately-supplied green space on the relationship between urban public green space and property value: Evidence from Shanghai, China’, Land Use Policy, 54, pp. 439−447. https://10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.001en
dc.referencesYAMU, C. and FRANKHAUSER, P. (2015), ‘Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl’, Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 42 (6), pp. 1054−1078. https://10.1068/b130171pen
dc.referencesYUE, Z. (2011), ‘A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS’, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (4), pp. 1926−1936.en
dc.referencesZACHARIASZ, A. (2006), Zieleń jako współczesny czynnik miastotwórczy ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli parków publicznych, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailFeltynowski, Marcin - marcin.feltynowski@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailRzeńca, Agnieszka - a.rzenca@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailRzeńca, Piotr - rzenca.piotr@bppwl.lodzkie.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailWróblewski, Wiktor - w.wroblewski@p.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07
dc.relation.volume30


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
145-169_Feltynowski_et_al..pdf
Rozmiar:
1.032MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0