Show simple item record

Dialogue with the community in the planning process. How to use the participatory approach as a planning tool for the community’s benefit?

dc.contributor.authorDeuskar, Aseem
dc.contributor.authorKhozrevanidze, Ketevan
dc.contributor.authorOzeren, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorParadowska, Iga
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T08:04:04Z
dc.date.available2023-03-08T08:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-17
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/46213
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.titleDialogue with the community in the planning process. How to use the participatory approach as a planning tool for the community’s benefit?en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number271-284
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDeuskar, Aseem - Polytechnic University of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Turin, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKhozrevanidze, Ketevan - Mersin University, Çiftlikköy, Mersin Ünv., 33110 Yenişehir/Mersin, Turkeyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationOzeren, Zeynep - Polytechnic University of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Turin, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationParadowska, Iga - University of Łódź, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kopcińskiego 31, 90-142 Łódź, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesBRYSON, J. (2004), ‘What to do when Stakeholders matter’, Public Management Review, 6 (1), pp. 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722en
dc.referencesCARDI (2012), 10 guidelines for writing policy recommendations, Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland.en
dc.referencesCROWE, S., CRESSWELL, K., ROBERTSON, A., HUBY, G., AVERY, A., and SHEIKH, A. (2011), ‘The case study approach’, BMC medical research methodology, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100en
dc.referencesEDEN, G., SHARMA, S., ROY, D., JOSHI, A., NOCERA, J. A. and RANGASWAMY, N. (2019), ‘Field trip as method: a rapid fieldwork approach’, [in] Proceedings of the 10th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364183.3364188en
dc.referencesERDIAW-KWASIE, M. O., and BASSON, M. (2018), ‘Reimaging socio-spatial planning: Towards a synthesis between sense of place and social sustainability approaches’, Planning Theory, 17 (4), pp. 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1473095217736793en
dc.referencesGUREL, E., and TAT, M. (2017), ‘SWOT Analysis: A Theoretical Review’, The Journal of International Social Research, 10 (51), pp. 994–1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832en
dc.referencesJACKSON, G. and MORPETH, N. (1999), ‘Local Agenda 21 and Community Participation in Tourism Policy and Planning: Future or Fallacy’, Current Issues in Tourism, 2 (1), pp. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683509908667841en
dc.referencesPRETO, I., MCCALL, M. K., FREITAS, M. and DOURADO, L. (2016), ‘Participatory Mapping of the Geography of Risk: Risk Perceptions of Children and Adolescents in Two Portuguese Towns’, Children, Youth and Environments, 26 (1), pp. 85–110. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.26.1.0085en
dc.referencesWESTON, J. and WESTON, M. (2013), ‘Inclusion and Transparency in Planning Decision-Making: Planning Officer Reports to the Planning Committee’, Planning Practice & Research, 28 (2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.704736en
dc.referencesJORGE, J. P., OLIVEIRA, V., SANTOS, L. L., VIANA, A. S. and MALHEIROS, C. (2022), ‘The Spatial Planning System in Portugal’, Theoretical Framework Report on European Spatial Planning of Tourism Destinations.en
dc.referencesKAIKA, M. (2017), ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: the New Urban Agenda as immunology … or … what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with «smart cities» and indicators’, Environment and Urbanization, 29 (1), pp. 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816684763en
dc.referencesKALLET, R. H. (2004), ‘How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper’, Respiratory Care, 49 (10), pp. 1229–1232.en
dc.referencesNANCY, J. L. (1991), ‘The inoperative community’, [in] CONNOR, P. (ed.), Theory and history of literature, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–42.en
dc.referencesVAN CAUWENBERGH, N., CIURÓ, A. B., and AHLERS, R. (2018), ‘Participatory processes and support tools for planning in complex dynamic environments: a case study on web-GIS based participatory water resources planning in Almeria, Spain’, Ecology and Society, 23 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09987-230202en
dc.contributor.authorEmailDeuskar, Aseem - deuskaraseeeem@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailKhozrevanidze, Ketevan - qeti.xozrevanidze.97@mail.ru
dc.contributor.authorEmailOzeren, Zeynep - s298840@studenti.polito.it
dc.contributor.authorEmailParadowska, Iga - ul0221854@edu.uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.29.2.14
dc.relation.volume29


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
624_14_ESRAP.pdf
Size:
1.490Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0