Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Discourses regarding the sustainability and environmental considerations in physical planning of second homes in Norwegian mountain destinations: a comparison between governmental documents, research literature and the general media

dc.contributor.authorTjørve, Even
dc.contributor.authorTjørve, Kathleen M. C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T08:04:00Z
dc.date.available2023-03-08T08:04:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-17
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/46207
dc.description.abstractThe neoliberal trend in spatial planning seemingly causes the loss of control of spatial plans for destination developments in the mountain regions of southern Norway. The predominant local discourse, as seen in local newspapers and other media, was originally positive to the development of second homes. Changes in development plans have, as in the Skeikampen-destination case, incited strong counter-discourses based on concerns for pasture rights, nature values, and access, in addition to sustainability in general. These discourses create a perception of reality in stark contrast to the central- government discourse, as found in the plan and building act, and governmental documents.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectdiscoursesen
dc.subjectmountain resorten
dc.subjectsecond-homesen
dc.subjectspatial planningen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.titleDiscourses regarding the sustainability and environmental considerations in physical planning of second homes in Norwegian mountain destinations: a comparison between governmental documents, research literature and the general mediaen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number131-147
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTjørve, Even - Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Organisation Science, PO Box 952, 2604 Lillehammer, Norwayen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTjørve, Kathleen M. C. - Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Organisation Science, PO Box 952, 2604 Lillehammer, Norwayen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesAALL, C. (2017), ‘Hyttelivet er ikkje lenger berekraftig’, Syn og segn (3), https://www.synogsegn.no/artiklar/2017/utg%C3%A5ve-3-17/carlo-aall/ [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesAASETRE, J. (2021), ‘Chapter 4. Kampen om utmarka: Hytter, beitemark eller urørt natur?’, [in:] FLÆMSÆTER, F. and FLØ, B. E. (eds.), Utmark i endring, Oslo: Cappelen Dam, pp. 93–121. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.151en
dc.referencesBENJAMINSEN, T. A. and SVARSTAD, H. (2017), Politisk økologi: Miljø, menneske og makt (2nd ed.), Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.en
dc.referencesBORGE, L.-E., ELLINGSEN, W., HJELSETH, A., LEIKVOLL, G. K., LØYLAND, K. and NYHUS, A. H. (2015), Inntekter og utgifter i hyttekommuner, TF-rapport nr. 349. Telemarksforskning, Agderforskning & SØF. https://openarchive.usn.no/usn-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2439423/2680.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesCRISTENSEN, T. B. (2019, 21. February), Hyttebygging truer naturen i Norge, Naturvernforbundet. https://naturvernforbundet.no/uttalelser-fra-styrendeorganer/hyttebygging-truer-naturen-i-norge-article38933-2128.htm [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesECKERBERG, K. and JOAS, M. (2004), ‘Multi-Level Governance: A Concept under Stress?’, Local Environment 9 (5), pp. 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000255315en
dc.referencesERIKSEN, K. (8 April 2022), Hyttebygging truer naturen i Norge, Naturvernforbundet. https://naturvernforbundet.no/areal-og-plansaker/hyttebygging-truer-naturen-i-norge-article42955-4407.html [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesFIMREITE, A. L., MEDALEN, T. and AARS, J. (2005), ‘By-governance’, [in:] FIMREITE, A. L. and MEDALEN, T. (eds.), Governance i norske storbyer, Mellom offentlig styring og privat initiativ. Oslo: Spartacus, pp. 11–34.en
dc.referencesFLOGNFELDT, T. and TJØRVE, E. (2013), ‘The shift from hotels and lodges to second-home villages in mountain-resort accommodation’, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 13 (4), pp. 332–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2013.862440en
dc.referencesGAUSDAL KOMMUNE (2021), Planprogram for revisjon av Kommunedelplan for Skei (2022–2035). Fastsatt av kommunestyret i k-sak 40/21 den 17.06.2021. https://gausdal.custompublish.com/getfile.php/4874445.1852.utwkqqasnapibb/Planprogram+Fastsatt+17_06_21.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesHAJER, M. (1995), The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesKALTENBORN, B. P. (1 April 2018), ‘Hyttebyggingen har gått over alle støvleskaft’, Aftenposten.en
dc.referencesKALTENBORN, B. P. (4 March 2021), ‘Utbygging på Skei – nå må Gausdal våkne!’, GD. https://www.gd.no/utbygging-pa-skei-na-ma-gausdal-vakne/o/5-18-1310215 [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesKOMMUNAL- OG DISTRIKTSDEPARTEMENTET (2008), Lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling (plan- og bygningsloven), Oslo: Kommunal- og distriktsdepartementet. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-27-71 [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesKOMMUNAL- OG MODERNISERINGSDEPARTEMENTET (2021), Fjell- og innlandsstrategi, Oslo: Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/931b031f226743a387c532408711f531/no/pdfs/fjell-og-innlandsstrategi.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesLANDBRUKSDEPARTEMENTET (2021), Utmarka er gull verdt, Regjeringa.no. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/utmarka-er-gull-verd/id2886015/en
dc.referencesLANDBRUKSKONTORET I LILLEHAMMERREGIONEN (2019), Årsrapport 2019, Landbrukskontoret i Lillehammer-regionen. https://www.gausdal.kommune.no/getfile.php/4707173.1852.jzkjnmkuwisssu/%C3%85rsrapport%20for%20Landbruk%202019.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesLERFALD, M., KNUTSEN, H., ANES, P. K., UGGEN, K. T., KVAMME, S., RYE, S. K. P., TOMTER, S. and OWREN, E. (2016), Verdiskaping i landbruk og landbruksbasert virksomhet i Oppland. ØF-rapport 10/2016. Østlandsforskning. https://www.ostforsk.no/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/201610_Sluttrapport-Oppland-Masterdokument.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesMDG (2021), Arbeidsprogram 2021–2021, Miljøpartiet de grønne. https://assets.nationbuilder.com/mdg/pages/4124/attachments/original/1631475774/Arbeidsprogram_2021-2025_bokmal.pdf?1631475774 [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesMILJØVERNDEPARTEMENTET (2005), Planlegging av fritidsbebyggelse. Veileder. T-1450, Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kilde/md/bro/2005/0063/ddd/pdfv/266942-t-1450.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesMILJØVERNDEPARTEMENTET (2012), Kommuneplanprosessen – samfunnsdelen – handlingsdelen. Veileder. T-1492, Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/493007ab4f9349a295a34982f77173ec/t-1492.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesRIKSRVISJONEN (2007), Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av bærekraftig arealplanlegging og arealdisponering i Norge, Dokument nr. 3:11 (2006–2007). Riksrevisjonen. https://www.stortinget.no/globalassets/pdf/dokumentserien/2006-2007/dok_3_11_2006_2007.pdf [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesROBBINS, P. (2020), Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.), Oxford: Wiley. SAGLIE, I.-L. and HARVOLD, K. (2010), ‘Arealplanlegging’, [in:] HARVOLD, K. (ed.), Ansvar og virkemidler ved tilpasning til klimaendringer, Samarbeidsrapport NIBR/CICERO/NIVA/TØI 2010, pp. 29–46.en
dc.referencesSKJEGGEDAL, T., ERICSSON, B. ARNESEN, T. and OVERVÅG, K. (2010), ‘Hytteliv i endring’, Plan 25, Januar 2010, pp. 42–49. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3045-2009-06-11en
dc.referencesSKJEGGEDAL, T., FLEMSAETER, F. and GUNDERSEN, V. (2021), ‘Land use planning in disputed mountain areas: conflicting interests and common arenas’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64 (7), pp. 1133–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1812379en
dc.referencesSLÅEN, Å and HOLØ, R. M. (2021), ‘Regjeringa vil ha meir utmarksbeite – bøndene peiker på konfliktar med hyttefolket’, NRK. https://www.nrk.no/innlandet/regjeringa-vil-ha-meir-utmarksbeite_-men-bondene-fryktar-fleire-konfliktar-med-hyttefelt-1.15725054 [accessed on: 21.05.2022].en
dc.referencesSSB/STATISTISK SENTRALBYRÅ (2022), ‘Befolkning’, https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/folketall/statistikk/befolkningen
dc.referencesTJØRVE, E. and FLOGNFELDT, T. (2013), ‘The effect of distance and belonging on second-home markets’, Tourism Geographies, 15 (2), pp. 268–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2012.726264en
dc.referencesTJØRVE, E., TJØRVE, K. M. C. and OWUSU, K. (2022), ‘Barriers and challenges to sustainable physical planning for mountain destinations and second-homes developments in the mountain region of south-eastern Norway: The reign of governments or developers?’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 29 (2), pp. 115–129. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.29.2.07en
dc.contributor.authorEmailTjørve, Even - even.tjorve@inn.no
dc.contributor.authorEmailTjørve, Kathleen M. C. - kathy.tjorve@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.29.2.08
dc.relation.volume29


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
624_08_ESRAP.pdf
Rozmiar:
374.7KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0