Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGórka, Katarzyna
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T06:26:20Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T06:26:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-03
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/45898
dc.description.abstractGlobal South perspective rarely reaches the academic vanguard. While they represent over 80% of the world population, the voices from less developed regions often are ignored in academic debate. This fact produces an important disequilibrium in relation to the dissemination of knowledge, sharing of experiences and exchange of thoughts and, consequently, undermines and hinders the development of scientific disciplines. Forensic anthropology is no exception in this trend.The present article brings up the subject of the context of forensic anthropology in Brazil to demonstrate the interconnection of the professional situation of this discipline, its structural and bureaucratic limitations and their effect on the perpetuation of human rights violation. Various aspects of daily practice of forensic anthropology in a context devoid of basic resources generate a setting that affects both the victims and their families. Despite an outstanding performance and dedication of professionals, structural limitations often substantially affect the effectiveness of their service. The present article discusses these aspects in a conceptual framework of the relation between the practice of forensic anthropology and human rights violation. In this research, Brazil serves as a case-study, an intensively studied subject that brings interpretations that can be applied in a broader context.The article aims at opening a broader, international debate that would increase the visibility of the relationship between the practice of forensic anthropology and the structure generating and/or maintaining violence in a specific economic and legislative context especially present in the countries of the so-called global South.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;4en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectforensic anthropologyen
dc.subjecthuman rightsen
dc.subjectGlobal Southen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectinfrastructureen
dc.subjectviolenceen
dc.subjectstructural violenceen
dc.subjecttheoryen
dc.titleA violent structure. Southern perspective on the practice of forensic anthropology as a public serviceen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number15-30
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of Anthropology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesAdovasio JM. 2011. An “outsider” look at forensic anthropology. In: Dirkmaat DC, editor. A Companion to Forensic Anthropology. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Blackwell, 683–689.en
dc.referencesAlbanese J, Saunders SR. 2006. Is It Possible to Escape Racial Typology in Forensic Identification? In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and forensic medicine: Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 281–316.en
dc.referencesBaraybar JP, Blackwell R. 2014. Where are they? Missing forensics and memory. Ann Anthropol Pract 38(1):22–42.en
dc.referencesBethard JD, DiGangi EA. 2020. Letter to the Editor–Moving Beyond a Lost Cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry Estimates in the United States. Forensic Sci Int 65(5):1791–1792.en
dc.referencesBufacci V. 2007. Violence by omission. In: Bufacci V, editor. Violence and social justice. Cork, UK: University College, 48–65.en
dc.referencesCalmon M. 2019. Forensic anthropology and missing persons: A Brazilian perspective. Forensic Sci Int 298:425.e1-425.e6.en
dc.referencesChristensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ. 2019. Forensic Anthropology: Current Methods and Practice, 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier.en
dc.referencesClifford Boyd C, Boyd CD. 2018. Forensic Anthropology: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.en
dc.referencesClifford Boyd C, Boyd CD. 2011. Theory and the Scientific Basis for Forensic Anthropology. J Forensic Sci 56(6):1407–1415.en
dc.referencesCollyer FM. 2018. Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, Global South. Curr Sociol 66(1):56–73.en
dc.referencesCunha E, Cattaneo C. 2006. Forensic anthropology: The state of the art. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and forensic medicine: Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 39–56.en
dc.referencesCunha E, Ubelaker DH. 2020. Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review. Forensic Sci Res 5(2):89–97.en
dc.referencesCunha E. 2010. Some reflections on the popularity of forensic anthropology today. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol 22:190–193.en
dc.referencesDavilla J. 2013. Dictatorships in Latin America. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.en
dc.referencesde Lima Amaral EF. 2013. Brazil: internal migration. In: Ness I, editor. The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration; Hoboken – NJ, United States: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–7.en
dc.referencesDiGangi EA, Bethard JD. 2021. Uncloaking a Lost Cause: Decolonizing ancestry estimation in the United States. Am J Phys Anthropol 175:422–436.en
dc.referencesDirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, et al. 2008. New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 137(S47):33–52.en
dc.referencesDunn RR, Spiros MC, Kamnikar KR, et al. 2020. Ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology: A review. WIREs Forensic Sci 2:e1369.en
dc.referencesFerllini R. 1999. The role of forensic anthropology in human rights issues. In: Fargrieve S, editor. Forensic osteological analysis: A book of case studies. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 287–301.en
dc.referencesFMB. 2020. Institutos médico-legais: Segundo CFM, Brasil apresenta discrepâncias de acesso. Federação Médica Brasileira. Available at: http://portalfmb.org.br/2016/10/19/institutos-medico-legais-segundo-cfm-brasil-apresenta-discrepancias-de-acesso-so/ [Accessed 31 October 2021].en
dc.referencesGaltung J. 1969. Violence, peace, and peace research. J Peace Res. 6(3):167–191.en
dc.referencesGaspar Neto VV. 2017. Biological anthropology in Brazil: A preliminary overview. Vibrant – (Brasília) 14(3):e14303.en
dc.referencesGórka K, Plens CR. 2021. In search of identity – the field of forensic anthropology in Brazil. J Forensic Sci 66(1):44–55.en
dc.referencesGórka K, Plens CR. 2020. Na fronteira Brasil – Polônia: cooperação acadêmica em Antropologia Forense a serviço dos Direitos Humanos. Revista Historia Debates e Tendências Passo Fundo 20(3):14–27.en
dc.referencesHughes SC. 2001. The Involvement of the Forensic Anthropologist in Human Rights Issues. Master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4136 [Accessed 13 September 2021].en
dc.referencesIBGE. 2020. IBGE divulga estimativa da população dos municípios para 2020. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadística. Available at: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-sala-de-imprensa/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/28668-ibge-divulga-estimativa-da-populacao-dos-municipios-para-2020 [Accessed 5 November 2020].en
dc.referencesICMP. 2020. Legal Frameworks and Rights. International Commission for Missing Persons. Available at: https://www.icmp.int/the-missing/legal-frameworks-andrights/ [Accessed 25 May 2020].en
dc.referencesIPEA. 2019. Atlas da violência. Instituto de Pesquisa Económica Aplicada. Available at: https://www.ipea.gov.br/atlasviolencia/dados-series/20 [Accessed 17 November 2021].en
dc.referencesKing R. 2011. Power and Networks in Worldwide Knowledge Coordination: The Case of Global Science. High Educ Policy 24:359–376.en
dc.referencesKlepinger LL. 2006. Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.en
dc.referencesLegarin M. 2010. Brazil must investigate and punish crimes committed under military dictatorship. Available at: https://cejil.org/comunicado-de-prensa/brazil-must-investigate-and-punish-crimes-committed-under-military-dictatorship/ [Accessed 20 October 2021].en
dc.referencesLoveman BE. 2018. Military Government in Latin America, 1959–1990. In: Vinson B, editor. Oxford Bibliographies in “Latin American Studies”. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766581/obo-9780199766581-0015.xml [Accessed 20 October 2021].en
dc.referencesMartinez M, Sá C. 2020. Highly Cited in the South: International Collaboration and Research Recognition Among Brazil’s Highly Cited Researchers. J Stud Int Educ 24(1):39–58.en
dc.referencesMazur M, Górka K, Alemán Aguilera I.2022. Smile photograph analysis and its connection with focal length as one of identification methods in forensic anthropology and odontology. Forensic Sci Int 335:111285.en
dc.referencesMinistério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. 2021a. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/desaparecidos/cadastro-nacional [Accessed 6 October 2021].en
dc.referencesMinistério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. 2021b. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ministerio-da-justicae-seguranca-publica-lanca-campanha-decoleta-de-dna-para-auxiliar-familias-nabusca-de-pessoas-desaparecidas [Accessed 6 October 2022].en
dc.referencesMiranda GE, Freitas SG, Maia LVA, et al. 2016. An unusual method of forensic human identification: use of selfie photographs. Forensic Sci Int 263:14–17.en
dc.referencesOdeth LE. 2010. A comparative analysis of Global North and Global South economies. J Sustain Dev Afr 12(3):338–348.en
dc.referencesPassalacqua NV, Pilloud MA, Congram D. 2021. Forensic Anthropology as a Discipline. Biology 10:691.en
dc.referencesPeters MA. 2006. The rise of global science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations. Eur J Educ 41(2):225–244.en
dc.referencesPotter H. 2018. A Lei da Anistia e o esquecimento dos crimes da ditadura militar. Available at: https://www.dw.com/pt-br/a-lei-da-anistia-e-o-esquecimento-doscrimes-da-ditadura-militar/a-45082182 [Accessed 20 October 2021].en
dc.referencesRoss AH, Pilloud M. 2021. The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: A call for reform. Am J Phys Anthropol 176(4):672–683.en
dc.referencesRoss AH, Williams SE. 2021. Ancestry Studies in Forensic Anthropology: Back on the Frontier of Racism. Biology 10:602.en
dc.referencesSabzalieva E, Martinez M, Sá C. 2020. Moving Beyond “North” and “South”: Global Perspectives on International Research Collaborations. J Stud Int Edu 24(1):3–8.en
dc.referencesSENASP. 2012. Diagnostico da Perícia Criminal no Brasil. [pdf]. Ministério da Justiça, Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Pública. Available at: https://www.mpma.mp.br/arquivos/CAOPCEAP/Diagn%C3%B3stico%20Per%C3%ADcia%20Criminal%20no%20Brasil.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2021].en
dc.referencesSilva RF, Franco A, Seixas JR, et al. 2016. Positive identification of a decomposed human body through forensic anthropology and smile photographs a case report. Eur J Forensic Sci 3(4):1–4.en
dc.referencesSilva RF, Pereira SD, Prado FB, et al. 2008. Forensic odontology identification using smile photograph analysis-case reports. J Forensic Odontostomatol 26(1):12–7. PMID: 22689352.en
dc.referencesSINALID. 2022. Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público. Available at: https://www.cnmp.mp.br/portal/institucional/comissoes/comissao-de-defesa-dos-direitos-fundamentais/sinalid/informacoes-sobre-o-sistema [Accessed 2 October 2022].en
dc.referencesSmay D, Armelagos G. 2000. Galileo Wept: A critical assessment of the use of race in Forensic Anthropology. Transform Anthropol 9(2):19–29.en
dc.referencesSquires K, García-Mancuso R. 2021. Ethical challenges associated with the study and treatment of human remains in anthropological sciences in the 21st century. Revista Argentina de Antropologia Biológica 23(2):1–22.en
dc.referencesTrindade Filho, A. 2018. Instituto de Pesquisa de DNA Forense, Polícia Civil do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Personal communication, 29.05.2018.en
dc.referencesUN. 2020. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights [Accessed 15 September 2021].en
dc.referencesUNIFESP. 2021. Grupo de Trabalho Perus identifica segundo desaparecido político. Boletim da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Available at: https://www.unifesp.br/boletins-anteriores/item/3642-grupo-de-trabalho-perus-identifica-segundo-desaparecido-politico [Accessed 17 November 2021].en
dc.referencesUNODC. 2019. Global Study on Homicide: Homicide trends, patterns and criminal justice response [pdf]. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes. Vienna. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet2.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2020].en
dc.referencesWinburn AP, Clemmons CMJ. 2021. Objectivity is a myth that harms the practice and diversity of forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synergy 3:100196.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkatarzyna.gorka@hirszfeld.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.85.4.02
dc.relation.volume85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0