Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorNieminen, Mika
dc.contributor.authorKuziemska-Pawlak, Kamila
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T11:52:58Z
dc.date.available2022-12-13T11:52:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/44627
dc.description.abstractA stylized fact of international capital markets is that advanced countries tend to be long and developing countries short in risky assets (i.e., portfolio equity and foreign direct investment (FDI)). In other words, residents of advanced countries hold a larger stock of portfolio equity abroad than residents of developing countries, and firms in advanced countries have more foreign subsidiaries than firms in developing countries. This paper is the first to utilize a large-scale international survey on economic preferences to propose a behavioral explanation for the heterogeneity in the asset composition of international investment positions. We provide robust empirical evidence that countries with a high time preference (i.e., patience) or a high risk preference (i.e., risk-taking) tend to have a positive net international investment position and a positive net risky position. In addition, we show that countries with a high degree of negative reciprocity (e.g., willingness to punish for unfair action) tend to have a positive net FDI position. Overall, our findings suggest that preferences are important determinants of cross- country variation in net foreign asset positions.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologicznypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLodz Economics Working Paper;
dc.subjectTime Preferencepl_PL
dc.subjectRisk Aversionpl_PL
dc.subjectNegative Reciprocitypl_PL
dc.subjectInternational Investment Positionpl_PL
dc.subjectEquity Investmentpl_PL
dc.subjectForeign Direct Investmentpl_PL
dc.titleCross-Country Variation in Economic Preferences and the Asset Composition of International Investment Positionspl_PL
dc.typeWorking Paperpl_PL
dc.page.number45pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSchool of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskyläpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.referencesBailey, N. 2018. Exploring the relationship between institutional factors and FDI attractiveness: A meta-analytic review. International Business Review 27 (1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.05.012pl_PL
dc.referencesBuiter, W. H. 1981. Time preference and international lending and borrowing in an overlapping- generation model. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 767–797. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/261002pl_PL
dc.referencesCa‘ Zorzi, M., Chudik, A., Dieppe, A. 2012. Thousands of models, one story: Current account imbalances in the global economy. Journal of International Money and Finance 31 (6): 1319– 1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.02.003pl_PL
dc.referencesCatāo, L. A. V., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. 2014. External liabilities and crises. Journal of International Economics 94 (1): 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.05.003pl_PL
dc.referencesChinn, M. D., Ito, H. 2007. Current account balances, financial development and institutions: Assaying the world “saving glut”. Journal of International Money and Finance 26 (4): 546– 569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.03.006pl_PL
dc.referencesChinn, M., Prasad, E. 2003. Medium-term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: an empirical exploration. Journal of International Economics 59 (1): 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00089-2pl_PL
dc.referencesContractor, F. J., Dangol, R., Nuruzzaman, N., Raghunath, S. 2020. How do country regulations and business environment impact foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows? International Business Review 29 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101640pl_PL
dc.referencesCoutinho, L., Turrini, A., Zeugner, S. 2022. Assessing the euro area current account. Journal of International Money and Finance 121 (102512). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102512pl_PL
dc.referencesDumas, B. 1989. Two-person dynamic equilibrium in the capital market. The Review of Financial Studies 2 (2): 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/2.2.157pl_PL
dc.referencesFalk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. 2018. Global evidence on economic preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (4): 1645–1692. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy013pl_PL
dc.referencesFehr, E., Gächter, S., Kirchsteiger, G. 1997. Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence. Econometrica 65 (4): 833–860. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171941pl_PL
dc.referencesFernández, C., Ley, E., Steel, M. F. J. 2001. Model uncertainty in cross-country growth regressions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (5): 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.623pl_PL
dc.referencesFukao, K., Hamada, K. 1989. The Fisherian time preference and the evolution of capital ownership patterns in a global economy. NBER Working Paper No. 3104. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3104pl_PL
dc.referencesGloberman, S., Shapiro, D. 2002. Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure. World Development 30 (11): 1899–1919 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00110-9pl_PL
dc.referencesGourinchas, P.-O., Rey, H. 2007. From world banker to world venture capitalist: US external adjustment and the exorbitant privilege. In: Clarida, R. (Ed.), G-7 Current account imbalances: sustainability and adjustment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (IL), pp. 11- 55. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0121pl_PL
dc.referencesGourinchas, P.-O., Rey, H. 2014. External adjustment, global imbalances, valuation effect. In: Gopinath, G., Helpman, E., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Volume 4. North-Holland, pp. 585–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00010-0pl_PL
dc.referencesGourinchas, P.-O., Rey, H. 2019. The international monetary and financial system. Annual Review of Economics 11: 859–893. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053518pl_PL
dc.referencesGourinchas, P.-O., Rey, H. 2022. Exorbitant privilege and exorbitant duty. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 16944. https://cepr.org/publications/dp16944pl_PL
dc.referencesGruber, J. W., Kamin, S. B. 2007. Explaining the global pattern of current account imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance 26 (4): 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.03.003pl_PL
dc.referencesHenrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., Ziker, J. 2006. Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312 (5781): 1767–1770. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1127333pl_PL
dc.referencesInternational Monetary Fund. 2009. Balance of payments and international investment position manual, Sixth Edition. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/pdf/bpm6.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesKorff, A., Steffen, N. 2022. Economic preferences and trade outcomes. Review of World Economics 158: 253–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-021-00431-4pl_PL
dc.referencesKosfeld, M., Rustagi, D. 2015. Leader punishment and cooperation in groups: Experimental field evidence from commons management in Ethiopia. American Economic Review 105 (2): 747– 783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120700pl_PL
dc.referencesLane P. R., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. 2001. The external wealth of nations: measures of foreign assets and liabilities for industrial and developing countries. Journal of International Economics 5: 263–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00102-7pl_PL
dc.referencesLane, P. R., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. 2018. The external wealth of nations revisited: International financial integration in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. IMF Economic Review 66: 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-017-0048-ypl_PL
dc.referencesMaggiori, M. 2017. Financial intermediation, international risk sharing, and reserve currencies. American Economic Review 107 (10): 3038–3071. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130479pl_PL
dc.referencesMeier, S., Sprenger, C. 2010. Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (1): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.1.193pl_PL
dc.referencesMendoza, E. G., Quadrini, V., Ríos-Rull, J.-V. 2009. Financial integration, financial development, and global imbalances. Journal of Political Economy 117 (3): 371–416. https://doi.org/10.1086/599706pl_PL
dc.referencesMetzler, L. A. 1960. The process of international adjustment under conditions of full employment: A Keynesian view. In: Caves, R. E., Johnson, H. G. (eds.), Readings in International Economics. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood (IL), pp. 465–486.pl_PL
dc.referencesNieminen M. 2022. Cross-country variation in patience, persistent current account imbalances and the external wealth of nations. Journal of International Money and Finance 121: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102517pl_PL
dc.referencesNunn, N., Trefler, D. Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. 2014. In E. Helpman, G. Gopinath, and K. Rogoff (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Volume 4, Chapter 5, pp. 263–315. North Holland, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00005-7pl_PL
dc.referencesObstfeld, M. 1990. Intertemporal dependence, impatience, and dynamics. Journal of Monetary Economics 26 (1): 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(90)90031-Xpl_PL
dc.referencesObstfeld, M. 2012. Does the current account still matter? American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 102 (3): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.1pl_PL
dc.referencesObstfeld, M., Rogoff, K. 1996. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).pl_PL
dc.referencesRieger, M. O., Wang, M., Hens, T. 2015. Risk preferences around the world. Management Science 61 (3): 637–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1869pl_PL
dc.referencesStepanchuk, S., Tsyrennikov, V. 2015. Portfolio and welfare consequences of debt market dominance. Journal of Monetary Economics 74: 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2015.06.005pl_PL
dc.referencesSunde, U., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Meyerheim, G. 2022. Patience and comparative development. The Review of Economic Studies 89 (5): 2806–2840. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdab084pl_PL
dc.referencesSutter, M., Kocher, M. G., Glätzle-Rützler, D., Trautmann, S. T. 2013. Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. American Economic Review 103 (1): 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.510pl_PL
dc.referencesTurrini, A., Zeugner, S. 2019. Benchmarks for net international investment positions. Journal of International Money and Finance 95: 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.01.017pl_PL
dc.referencesVermeulen, R., de Haan, J. 2014. Net foreign asset (com)position: Does financial development matter? Journal of International Money and Finance 43: 88–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.12.006pl_PL
dc.referencesWang, M., Rieger, M. O., Hens, T. 2016. How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology 52: 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.001pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmika.p.nieminen@jyu.fipl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailkamila.kuziemska@uni.lodz.plpl_PL
dc.relation.volume3pl_PL
dc.disciplineekonomia i finansepl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord