dc.contributor.author | Pinzani, Alessandro | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gensler, Marek | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kędziora, Krzysztof | |
dc.contributor.editor | Miksa, Joanna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-28T11:13:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-28T11:13:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pinzani A., A Civic Ethics in Kant?, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.27 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8220-570-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42289 | |
dc.description.abstract | The paper investigates whether there is space in Kant’s practical thought for juridical
morality and for political virtues. To this end, we will first discuss the Doctrine of
Method of the second Critique and consider the possible existence of a moral schematism
analogous to the transcendental schematism of the first Critique. We will then
consider differences and similarities between Kant’s doctrine of right and his ethics,
in order to ponder the question whether one can assert the possibility of political and
civic virtues in his political thought. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | doctrine of method | pl_PL |
dc.subject | schematism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | republicanism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | civic virtues | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Kant | pl_PL |
dc.title | A Civic Ethics in Kant? | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 527-541 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8220-571-8 | |
dc.references | Allison, H. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bacin, S. (2010). “Methodology of Pure Practical Reason”, in: Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–215. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Beck, L. W. (1960). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Berkowitz, P. (1999). Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gonnelli, F. (1999). Guida alla lettura della ‘Critica della ragion pratica’ di Kant. Roma–Bari: Laterza. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Habermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Höffe, O. (2001). Königliche Völker. Zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kaniowski, A. M. (2013). “Kantian Re-construction of Intersubjectivity Forms: The Logic of the Transition from Natural State to the Threshold of the Civic State”, in: Flores, I. B. and Himma, K. E. (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 49–64. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1900–). Gesammelte Schriften (Hrsg.): Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Critique of Practical Reason”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Doctrine of Right”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Doctrine of Virtue”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Metaphysics of Morals”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by Wood, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “The Conflict of the Faculties”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996). “Towards Perpetual Peace”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, M. J., introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kopper, J. (2004). “Die Bedeutung der Methodenlehre”, in: Fischer, N. (ed.), Kants Metaphysik und Religionsphilosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 391–407. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Machiavelli, N. (1981). Lettere, edited by F. Gaeta. Milano: Feltrinelli. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Machiavelli, N. (1997). Discourses on Livy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Munzel, G. F. (1999). Kant’s Conception of Moral Character. The Critical Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Munzel, G. F. (2002). “Doctrine of Method and Closing”, in: Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (Klassiker Auslegen). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 203–217. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pinzani, A. (2005). “Der systematische Stellenwert der pseudo-ulpianischen Regel in Kants Rechtslehre”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 59 (1), pp. 71–94. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rousseau, J. J. (1992). Du contrat social. Paris: Flammarion. | pl_PL |
dc.references | dos Santos, R. (2007). Moralität und Erziehung bei Immanuel Kant. Kassel: Kassel University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Seubert, S. (1999). Gerechtigkeit und Wohlwollen. Bürgerliches Tugendverständnis nach Kant. Frankfurt am Main–New York: Campus. | pl_PL |
dc.references | de Tocqueville, A. (2004). Souvenirs. Paris: Gallimard. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8220-570-1.28 | |