Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPinzani, Alessandro
dc.contributor.editorGensler, Marek
dc.contributor.editorGralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.editorKazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta
dc.contributor.editorKędziora, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.editorMiksa, Joanna
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T11:13:52Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T11:13:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPinzani A., A Civic Ethics in Kant?, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.27pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-570-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42289
dc.description.abstractThe paper investigates whether there is space in Kant’s practical thought for juridical morality and for political virtues. To this end, we will first discuss the Doctrine of Method of the second Critique and consider the possible existence of a moral schematism analogous to the transcendental schematism of the first Critique. We will then consider differences and similarities between Kant’s doctrine of right and his ethics, in order to ponder the question whether one can assert the possibility of political and civic virtues in his political thought.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofPractica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectdoctrine of methodpl_PL
dc.subjectschematismpl_PL
dc.subjectrepublicanismpl_PL
dc.subjectcivic virtuespl_PL
dc.subjectKantpl_PL
dc.titleA Civic Ethics in Kant?pl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number527-541pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarinapl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-571-8
dc.referencesAllison, H. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBacin, S. (2010). “Methodology of Pure Practical Reason”, in: Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–215.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeck, L. W. (1960). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerkowitz, P. (1999). Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGonnelli, F. (1999). Guida alla lettura della ‘Critica della ragion pratica’ di Kant. Roma–Bari: Laterza.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.pl_PL
dc.referencesHöffe, O. (2001). Königliche Völker. Zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.pl_PL
dc.referencesKaniowski, A. M. (2013). “Kantian Re-construction of Intersubjectivity Forms: The Logic of the Transition from Natural State to the Threshold of the Civic State”, in: Flores, I. B. and Himma, K. E. (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 49–64.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1900–). Gesammelte Schriften (Hrsg.): Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Critique of Practical Reason”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Doctrine of Right”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Doctrine of Virtue”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Metaphysics of Morals”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by Wood, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “The Conflict of the Faculties”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996). “Towards Perpetual Peace”, in: Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, M. J., introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKopper, J. (2004). “Die Bedeutung der Methodenlehre”, in: Fischer, N. (ed.), Kants Metaphysik und Religionsphilosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 391–407.pl_PL
dc.referencesMachiavelli, N. (1981). Lettere, edited by F. Gaeta. Milano: Feltrinelli.pl_PL
dc.referencesMachiavelli, N. (1997). Discourses on Livy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMunzel, G. F. (1999). Kant’s Conception of Moral Character. The Critical Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMunzel, G. F. (2002). “Doctrine of Method and Closing”, in: Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (Klassiker Auslegen). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 203–217.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinzani, A. (2005). “Der systematische Stellenwert der pseudo-ulpianischen Regel in Kants Rechtslehre”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 59 (1), pp. 71–94.pl_PL
dc.referencesRousseau, J. J. (1992). Du contrat social. Paris: Flammarion.pl_PL
dc.referencesdos Santos, R. (2007). Moralität und Erziehung bei Immanuel Kant. Kassel: Kassel University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeubert, S. (1999). Gerechtigkeit und Wohlwollen. Bürgerliches Tugendverständnis nach Kant. Frankfurt am Main–New York: Campus.pl_PL
dc.referencesde Tocqueville, A. (2004). Souvenirs. Paris: Gallimard.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-570-1.28


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe