Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbana, Alessandro
dc.contributor.editorSocha, Marcin
dc.contributor.editorZaręba, Michał
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T11:15:51Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T11:15:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationAlbana A., Beijing turns to the seas. Combining assertive postures with cooperation, [in:] M. Socha, M. Zaręba (ed.), Asia in World Politics: Past, Present, and Future, WUŁ, Łódź 2021, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-793-4.02pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-793-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42143
dc.description.abstractChina’s effort to build itself up into a maritime superpower has drawn scholars’ attention. Questions arise whether the Chinese maritime turn can be considered in terms of potential destabilization of the maritime border in the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean region, or rather, as a contributor to maintaining such an order. Those who believe that China’s maritime rise represents a destabilizing force, point at Beijing’s assertive posture in the East and South China seas. Other scholars argue, that Chinese navy (PLAN) has taken part in humanitarian assistance, disaster relief (HA/DR) and anti-piracy missions in the Indo-Pacific region, contributing to the international maritime cooperation. State-of-the-art analyses have focused either on China’s assertiveness, chiefly in regional seas, or on Beijing’s difficulties to catching up with a blue-water navy status in a global scenario. Rather than assuming China’s maritime projection as a uniform pattern, this study empasizes that Beijing pursues a twofold strategy. On regional waters, where its navy is capable of exercising effective military might, China operates assertively and does not seek multilateral cooperation. On the high seas, where PLAN’s forays suffer from weaker preparedness and training, Beijing has joined the international community in maintaining the world order. China pursued naval diplomacy efforts, as demonstrated by its participation in anti-piracy missions in the Gulf of Aden since 2008 and its contribution to numerous HA/DR initiatives. China’s regional assertiveness and its global cooperative posture reinforce Beijing’s maritime projection.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofAsia in World Politics: Past, Present, and Future;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectChinapl_PL
dc.subjectSouth China Seapl_PL
dc.subjectEast China Seapl_PL
dc.subjectseapowerpl_PL
dc.titleBeijing turns to the seas. Combining assertive postures with cooperationpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number11-25pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Venicepl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-794-1
dc.referencesAlmond, R.G. 2018, “Trade, war, and the South China Sea”, The Diplomat, viewed 13 September 2018, https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/trade-war-and-the-south-china-sea/pl_PL
dc.referencesAsia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2018, “China lands first bomber on South China Sea Island, Asia maritime transparency”, viewed 7 September 2018, https://amti.csis.org/china-lands-first-bomber-south-china-sea-island/pl_PL
dc.referencesAsia Maritime Transparency Initiative, n.d., “China Island Tracker”, viewed 4 September 2018, https://amti.csis.org/island-tracker/china/pl_PL
dc.referencesCasarini, N. 2018, “Beijing’s ambitions in the South China Sea: how should Europe respond?”, Istituto Affari Internazionali, viewed 20 September 2018, http://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/beijings-ambitions-south-china-sea-how-should-europe-respondpl_PL
dc.referencesChellaney, B. 2016, “Major maritime powers and their changing relationship: The United States, Europe, China, India and others” in Krause, J. & Bruns, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Naval Strategy and Security, Routledge, Abingdon & New York, pp. 328–338.pl_PL
dc.referencesChellaney, B. 2018, “Who lost the South China Sea?”, Project Syndicate, viewed 11 September 2018, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/united-states-policy-south-china-sea-expansionism-by-brahma-chellaney-2018-06pl_PL
dc.referencesChen, D. & Wang, J. 2011, “Lying low no more?: China’s new thinking on the Tao Guang Yang Hui strategy”, China: An International Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 195–216.pl_PL
dc.referencesChina Power Team, 2017a, “How Is China bolstering its military diplomatic relations?”, China Power, viewed 18 September 2018, https://chinapower.csis.org/china-military-diplomacy/pl_PL
dc.referencesChina Power Team, 2017b, “How much trade transits the South China Sea?”, China Power, viewed 19 September 2018, https://chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea/pl_PL
dc.referencesChubb, A. 2016, Chinese Popular Nationalism and PRC Policy in the South China Sea, PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, viewed 19 September 2018, https://api.research-repository. uwa.edu.au/portalfiles/portal/15600509/THESIS_DOCTOR_OF_PHILOSOPHY_CHUBB_Andrew_2016.PDFpl_PL
dc.referencesChubb, A. 2017, “China’s ‘blue territory’ and the technosphere in maritime East Asia”, Tecnosphere Magazine, viewed 20 September 2018, https://technosphere-magazine. hkw.de/p/Chinas-Blue-Territory-and-the-Technosphere-in-Maritime-East-AsiagihSRWtV8AmPTof2traWnApl_PL
dc.referencesCole, B.D. 2016, China’s Quest for Great Power: Ships, Oil and Foreign Policy, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis.pl_PL
dc.referencesCooper, Z. 2018, “Security implications of China’s military presence in the Indian Ocean” in Szechenyi, N. (ed.), China’s Maritime Silk Road. Strategic and Economic Implications for the Indo-Pacific Region, Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp. 26–29.pl_PL
dc.referencesCorbett, J.S. 1918, Some Principles of Maritime Strategy, Longmans, Green & CO., London.pl_PL
dc.referencesGallo, W. 2018, “US excludes China from military drill over South China Sea actions”, Voice of America, viewed 19 September 2018, https://www.voanews.com/a/us-excludes-china-rimpac-military-drill-south-china-sea/4406716.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesGarofano, J. 2008, “China–Southeast Asia relations: problems and prospects” in Yoshihara, T. & Holmes, J.R. (eds), Asia Looks Seaward. Power and Maritime Strategy, Praeger Security International, Westport, pp. 169–184.pl_PL
dc.referencesGhiasy, R., Su, F. & Saalman, L. 2018, “The 21st century maritime Silk Road: security implications and ways forward for the European Union”, SIPRI, viewed 19 September 2018, https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/the-21st-century-maritime-silk-road.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesHattendorf, J. 2015, Mahan on Naval Strategy: Selections from the Writings of Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis.pl_PL
dc.referencesHayton, R. 2018, “The modern creation of China’s ‘historic rights’ claim in the South China Sea”, Asian Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2018, pp. 370–382.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeng, Y.K. 2017, “China and Japanese ‘soft power’ projection: a tangled web of culture, geostrategic competition, and naval power” in Lam, P.E. (ed.), China-Japan Relations in the 21st Century. Antagonism Despite Interdependency, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 263–287.pl_PL
dc.referencesHui, X. & Cao, X. 2016, “A perspective on China’s maritime security strategy” in Krause, J. & Bruns, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Naval Strategy and Security, Routledge, Abingdon & New York, pp. 339–350.pl_PL
dc.referencesJu, H. 2015, China’s Maritime Power and Strategy. History, National Security and Geopolitics, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.pl_PL
dc.referencesLegarda, H. 2018, “China global security tracker, No. 3”, January–June 2018, MERICS, viewed 18 September 2018, https://www.merics.org/en/merics-trackers/china-global-security-tracker-3pl_PL
dc.referencesMahan, A.T. 1911, “The importance of command of the sea”, Scientific American, Vol. 105, No. 24, pp. 511–512.pl_PL
dc.referencesMahan, A.T. 2015, The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660–1783, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMahanta, S. 2015, “Dredging for disaster”, Foreign Policy, viewed 20 September 2018, https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/15/dredging-for-disaster-china-land-reclamation-south-china-sea-spratly/pl_PL
dc.referencesMcVadon, E.A. 2011, “The PLA Navy as an instrument of statecraft” in Saunders, P.C., Yung, C.D., Swaine, M. & Yang, A.N.D. (eds), The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles, National Defense University Press, Washington D.C., pp. 215–246.pl_PL
dc.referencesNational Development and Reform Commission of the PRC & State Oceanic Administration, 2017, “‘一带一路’ 建设海上合作设想” [The concept of maritime cooperation in the construction of the “Belt and Road Initiative”], National Development and Reform Commission, viewed 18 September 2018, https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201711/t20171116_962592.html?code=&state=123pl_PL
dc.referencesNational Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Commerce of the PRC, 2015, “推动共建丝绸之路经济带和21世纪海上丝绸之路的愿景与行动” [Vision and actions on jointly building the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road], People’s Daily Online, viewed 15 October 2018, http://ydyl.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0425/c411837-29235511.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesNi, A. 2018, “Despite strong words, the US has few options left to reverse China’s gains in the South China Sea”, The Conversation, viewed 19 September 2018, http:// theconversation.com/despite-strong-words-the-us-has-few-options-left-to-reverse-chinas-gains-in-the-south-china-sea-97089pl_PL
dc.referencesNie, W. 2016, “Xi Jinping’s foreign policy dilemma: One Belt, One Road or the South China Sea?”, Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 422–444.pl_PL
dc.referencesNye, J.S. 2004, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs, New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesNye, J.S. 2011, “The war on soft power”, Foreign Policy, viewed 20 September 2018, https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/12/the-war-on-soft-power/pl_PL
dc.referencesPanda, A. 2018, “South China Sea: what China’s first strategic bomber landing on Woody Island means”, The Diplomat, viewed 23 September 2018, https://thediplomat. com/2018/05/south-china-sea-what-chinas-first-strategic-bomber-landing-on-woody-island-means/pl_PL
dc.referencesScholik, N. 2016, “Power-projection vs. Anti-Access/Area-Denial (A2/AD): The Operational Concepts of the U.S. Navy (USN) and the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) in the Indo-Pacific Region” in Krause, J. & Bruns, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Naval Strategy and Security, Routledge, Abingdon & New York, pp. 177–188.pl_PL
dc.referencesState Council Information Office of the PRC, 2015, 《中国的军事战略》白皮书 [“China’s Military Strategy” White Paper], viewed 18 September 2018, http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/2015/Document/1435161/1435161.htmpl_PL
dc.referencesThayer, C.A. 2018, “A closer look at the ASEAN-China single draft South China sea code of conduct”, The Diplomat, viewed 10 September 2018, https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/a-closer-look-at-the-asean-china-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct/pl_PL
dc.referencesTill, G. 2009, Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century, Routledge, Abingdon.pl_PL
dc.referencesTobin, L. 2018, “Underway – Beijing’s strategy to build China into a maritime great power”, Naval War College Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, Art. 5, pp. 17–32.pl_PL
dc.referencesTownshend, A. & Medcalf, R. 2016, Shifting Waters: China’s New Passive Assertiveness in Asian Maritime Security, Lowy Institute for International Policy, Sydney.pl_PL
dc.referencesUS Energy Information Administration, 2013, South China Sea, viewed 19 September 2018, https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.php?RegionTopicID=SCSpl_PL
dc.referencesUS Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2017, Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2017, viewed 17 September 2018, https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDFpl_PL
dc.referencesWebb, W.T. 2011, “The mythical foundation of the post-modern navy”, Petty Tyranny, viewed 17 September 2018, https://pettytyranny.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/the-mythical-foundations-of-the-post-modern-navy/pl_PL
dc.referencesYahuda, M. 2012, “China’s recent relations with maritime neighbours”, The International Spectator, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 30–44.pl_PL
dc.referencesYoshihara, T. & Holmes, J.R. 2010, Red Star over the Pacific: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Maritime Strategy, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis.pl_PL
dc.referencesYoshihara, T. 2010, “China’s ‘soft’ naval power in the Indian Ocean”, Pacific Focus, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 59–88.pl_PL
dc.referencesZha, D. & Sutter, R. 2017, “Outlooks on Chinese energy security vulnerabilities” in Mochizuki, M.M. & Ollapally, D.M. (eds), Energy Security in Asia ad Eurasia, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 36–59.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-793-4.02


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe