Pokaż uproszczony rekord

The Slovenian planning system 30 years later: Lessons learnt and lessons not learnt

dc.contributor.authorMarot, Naja
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T18:33:15Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T18:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/41148
dc.description.abstractAfter gaining independence, countries such as Slovenia put a lot of effort into adapting their legislations to new market conditions. While concentrating on legislation, they often dismissed several other factors which influence policy and decision making. Among them, a particularly important role is played by the Europeanisation of planning, and the turn towards a higher flexibility of processes and land uses as opposed to the predetermination via zoning. While shedding light on these issues, this paper reflects on the incremental evolution of the Slovenian spatial planning system from the approval of the first Spatial Planning Act in 2003 towards a territorial governance approach characterised by a mix of regulatory processes and plans.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectspatial planning systemen
dc.subjectplanning lawen
dc.subjectEuropeanisationen
dc.subjectSloveniaen
dc.subjectterritorial governanceen
dc.titleThe Slovenian planning system 30 years later: Lessons learnt and lessons not learnten
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number63-81
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Landscape Architecture, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Sloveniaen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesARNSTEIN, S. R. (1969), ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), pp. 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225en
dc.referencesBALDWIN, R. and BLACK, J. (2008), ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, The Modern Law Review, 71 (1), pp. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00681.xen
dc.referencesBERISHA, E., COTELLA, G., JANIN RIVOLIN, U. and SOLLY, A. (2021), ‘Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology’, European Planning Studies, 29 (1), pp. 181−200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295en
dc.referencesBLACK, J. (2002), ‘Regulatory Conversations’, Journal of Law and Society, 29 (1), pp. 163–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00215en
dc.referencesBUITELAAR, E., GALLE, M. and SOREL, N. (2011), ‘Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalization of planning law’, Environment and Planning A, 43 (4), pp. 928−941. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43400en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. (2020), ‘How Europe hits home? The impact of European Union policies on territorial governance and spatial planning’, Géocarrefour, 94 (3). https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.15648en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. and RIVOLIN, U. J. (2011), ‘Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy’, disP - The Planning Review, 47 (186), pp. 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. and STEAD, D. (2011), ‘Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors: Some conclusions’, disP - The Planning Review, 47 (186), pp. 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146en
dc.referencesDEKLEVA, J. (1999), ‘Instruments of spatial development regulation’, [in:] DROZG, V. (ed.), The key instruments of urban and spatial planning at the start of the new millennium: the state of art and the trend (SI: Ključni vzvodi urbanističnega in prostorskega planiranja na prelomu tisočletja: stanje in trendi). Book of abstracts. 15. Sedlarjevo srečanje, Maribor, 21.–23. Ljubljana, Town and Spatial Planning Association of Slovenia, pp. 27–38.en
dc.referencesDÜHR, S. and NADIN, V. (2007), ‘Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe’, Planning, Practice & Research, 22 (3), pp. 373−394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701666738en
dc.referencesDUHR, S., STEAD, D. and ZONNEVELD, W. (eds.) (2007), ‘The Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Territorial Cooperation’, Planning Practice & Research, 22 (3), pp. 291–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245en
dc.referencesFALUDI, A. (2014), ‘EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning?’ Planning Theory & Practice, 15 (2), pp. 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902095en
dc.referencesFENKO, A. B. and LOVEC, M. (2015), ‘From a Good to a Poor Student: The De-Europeanisation of Slovenian Foreign Policy in the Light of (European) Economic and Financial Crisis’, Études helléniques/Hellenic Studies, 23 (1), pp. 111–140.en
dc.referencesFINK-HAFNER, D. and DEŽELAN, T. (2014), ‘The political science professional project in Slovenia: from communist monism, democratisation and Europeanisation to the financial crisis’, Društvena istraživanja, 23 (1), pp. 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.23.1.07en
dc.referencesFINK-HAFNER, D., HAFNER-FINK, M. and NOVAK, M. (2015), ‘Europeanisation as a factor of national interest group political-cultural change: The case of interest groups in Slovenia’, East European Politics and Societies, 29 (1), pp. 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414535625en
dc.referencesGAJŠEK, M. (2018), ‘Prostorsko planiranje med državnim intervencionizmom in prostim trgom. Spatial planning in-between state interventionism and the free market’, [in:] ZAVODNIK LAMOVŠEK, A. (ed.), Prostorski načrtovalci 21. stoletja: 60 let KPP, 45 let IPŠPUP. Ljubljana: UL FGG – Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo Univerze v Ljubljani, pp. 39–45.en
dc.referencesGEDDES, A., LEES, C. and TAYLOR, A. (2013), The European Union and South East Europe: the dynamics of Europeanization and multilevel governance, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112267en
dc.referencesGOLOBIČ, M., MAROT, N., COF, A., BANTAN, M., HUDOKLIN, J. and HOČEVAR, I. (2014), SPRS2030 – Analysis of the implementation of the Strategy of the Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia. Ljubljana, Biotehniška fakulteta, Novo Mesto: ACER.en
dc.referencesGUALINI, E. (2003), ‘Challenges to multi-level governance: contradictions and conflicts in the Europeanization of Italian regional policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10 (4), 616–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000101280en
dc.referencesInformal meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion (2020), Territorial Agenda 2030. https://www.territorialagenda.eu/files/agenda_theme/agenda_data/Territorial%20Agenda%20documents/TerritorialAgenda2030_201201.pdf [accessed on: 13.01.2021].en
dc.referencesKAJFEŽ-BOGATAJ, L., ČREPINŠEK, Z., ZALAR, M., GOLOBIČ, M., MAROT, N. and LESTAN, K. A. (2014), Groundworks for the evaluation of the risks and opportunities climate changes bring to Slovenia: final report, Ljubljana: Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, p. 149.en
dc.referencesKAJNČ, S. (2011), ‘The europeanisation of Slovenian foreign policy: from accession to presidency of the council of the EU’, Teorija in Praksa, 48 (3), pp. 668−687.en
dc.referencesKLEMENČIČ, M. (2013), ‘The effects of Europeanisation on institutional diversification in the Western Balkans’, The globalisation challenge for European Higher Education: Convergence and diversity, centres and peripherie, Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, pp. 117–138.en
dc.referencesKOMAR, O. and NOVAK, M. (2020), ‘Introduction: (De) democratisation in Slovenia and Montenegro: Comparing the Quality of Democracy’, Politics in Central Europe, 16 (3), pp. 569−592. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0026en
dc.referencesLADRECH, R. (1994), ‘Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: The case of France’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 32, pp. 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1994.tb00485.xen
dc.referencesLOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT ACT (2007), Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 94, pp. 12729–12746.en
dc.referencesLUHMANN, N. (2008), Law as a social system, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 498.en
dc.referencesLUUKKONEN, J. (2011), ‘Europeanization of spatial planning. Exploring the spatialities of European integration’, Nordia Geographical Publications, 40 (3), pp. 1–59.en
dc.referencesMAIER, K. (2012), ‘Europeanization and changing planning in East-Central Europe: An Easterner’s view’, Planning Practice & Research, 27, pp. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661596en
dc.referencesMANSFELDOVÁ, Z. (2011), ‘Central European parliaments over two decades–diminishing stability? Parliaments in Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17 (2), pp. 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.574023en
dc.referencesMAROT, N. (2010), An Assessment of the role of spatial planning legislation in the Slovenian spatial planning system, Doctoral thesis. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, p. 312.en
dc.referencesMAROT, N. (2011), ‘Upravljavska sposobnost slovenskih občin na področju prostorskega načrtovanja’, Acta geographica Slovenica, 50, (1), pp. 131−157. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS50106en
dc.referencesMAROT, N. (2014), Resilience: a word non-existing, yet sufficiently integrated into planning, Spa-ce.net conference, Bratislava.en
dc.referencesMAROT, N. (2018), ‘Evropeizacija slovenskega prostorskega načrtovanja - deset let prizadevanj in izkušenj = Europeanisation of Slovenian spatial planning - ten years of efforts and experiences’, [in:] ZAVODNIK LAMOVŠEK, A. (ed.), Prostorski načrtovalci 21. stoletja: 60 let KPP, 45 let IPŠPUP. Ljubljana: UL FGG - Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo Univerze v Ljubljani, pp. 46–53.en
dc.referencesMAROT, N. (2021), ‘Slovenia: [Countries subject to the Mediterranean ICZM Protocol]’, [in:] ALTERMAN, R. and PELLACH, C. (eds.), Regulating coastal zones: international perspectives on land-management instruments, (Urban planning and environment), New York: Routledge, pp. 220–236. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432699-11en
dc.referencesMAROT, N., KLEPEJ, D., OGRAJENŠEK, I., PERVIZ, L., URŠIČ, M. and HORVAT, U. (2020), Urban tourism and COVID-19; Report of the activity 3.5, WP3, Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana; Maribor: University of Maribor, p. 54.en
dc.referencesMAROT, N., KOLARIČ, Š. and GOLOBIČ, M. (2013), ‘Slovenia as the natural Park of Europe? Territorial impact assessment in the case of Natura 2000’, Acta geographica Slovenica, 53 (1), pp. 91–116. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS53105en
dc.referencesMAROT, N., PENKO SEIDL, N., KOSTANJŠEK, B. and HARFST, J. (2019), Study on the green infrastructure and ecological connectivity governance in the EUSALP area: Action group 7: To develop ecological connectivity in the whole EUSALP territory, Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, p. 87.en
dc.referencesMCAUSLAN, P. (1980), The ideologies of planning law, Oxford: Pergamon Press, p. 282.en
dc.referencesMIHELIČ, B., HUMAR, M., NIKŠIČ, M. et al. (2015), Urbanistični terminološki slovar, Ljubljana: Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije, ZRC SAZU. https://doi.org/10.3986/978-961-254-943-5en
dc.referencesMIKULEC, B. (2017), ‘Impact of the Europeanisation of education: Qualifications frameworks in Europe’, European Educational Research Journal, 16 (4), pp. 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116673645en
dc.referencesMINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING (2004), Strategy of the Spatial Development of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning.en
dc.referencesMÜNTER, A. and REIMER, M. (2020), ‘Planning Systems on the Move? Persistence and Change of the German Planning System’, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1832362en
dc.referencesNEEDHAM, B. (2007), ‘Final comment: Land-use planning and the law’, Planning Theory, 6 (2), pp. 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077588en
dc.referencesPETERLIN, M. and MCKENZIE, J. K. (2007), ‘The Europeanization of spatial planning in Slovenia’, Planning, Practice & Research, 22 (3), pp. 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701666811en
dc.referencesPOGAČNIK, A. (2005), ‘Prispevek k integraciji prostorskega, socialnega, gospodarskega in okoljskega načrtovanja’, Dela, 24, pp. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.24.49-59en
dc.referencesPURKARTHOFER, E. (2016), ‘When soft planning and hard planning meet: Conceptualising the encounter of European, national and sub-national planning’, European Journal of Spatial Development, 61, pp. 1–20.en
dc.referencesRAAGMAA, G. and STEAD, D. (2014), ‘Spatial Planning in the Baltic States: Impacts of European Policies’, European Planning Studies, 22 (4), pp. 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772730en
dc.referencesSPATIAL PLANNING ACT (2003), Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 110, pp. 13057–13083.en
dc.referencesSPATIAL PLANNING ACT (2007), Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 33, pp. 4585–4602.en
dc.referencesSPATIAL PLANNING ACT (2017), Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 61, pp. 8254–8310.en
dc.referencesŠOBOT, A. and LUKŠIČ, A. (2020), ‘Natura 2000 Experiences in Southeast Europe: Comparisons from Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Journal of Comparative Politics, 13 (1), pp. 46–57.en
dc.referencesTULUMELLO, S., COTELLA, G. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2020), ‘Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies’, International Planning Studies, 25 (1), pp. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1701422en
dc.referencesVAN DIJK, T. and BEUNEN, R. (2009), ‘Laws, people and land use: A sociological perspective on the relation between laws and land use’, European Planning Studies, 17 (12), pp. 1797–1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903322314en
dc.referencesWEBER, M. (1964), Max Weber, the theory of social and economic organization, New York: Free Press, p. 436.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailNaja.Marot@bf.uni-lj.si
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.04
dc.relation.volume28


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
63-81_Marot.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.506MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0