dc.contributor.author | Amielańczyk, Krzysztof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-26T15:53:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-26T15:53:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2084-140X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/3989 | |
dc.description.abstract | The offence of embezzlement of public funds – peculatus – is an interesting research subject due to the Roman legislator’s original approach to the issue of the classification of types of criminal offences (crimina). The paper aims to present Roman regulations concerning peculatus from the perspective of the methods of classifying its features as adopted by the compilers, taking into account both the normative contents of original laws (created by the original authors of these laws), as well as those added by later legislative factors: emperors, the senate and jurisprudence. The study of the Julian law on embezzlement of public funds may be conducted following the Justinian’s title Ad legem Iuliam peculatus et de sacrilegis et de residuis (Dig., 48, 13). Peculatus was the basic type of the offence of embezzlement of public funds. In the time of Augustus, two separate types of the offence isolated from peculatus, which were sacrilegium (probably within one law - lex Iulia peculatus) and embezzlement of a specific kind of money, i.e. pecunia residua (probably within a separate law - lex Iulia de residuis). Despite being quite precisely defined by the law, the type of the offence of embezzlement of public funds must have raised doubts when it came to applying the law, in cases where the act the offender was charged with came close to theft (crimen furti) or forgery (crimen falsi). | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego (Lodz University Press) | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Center for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe;2 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.title | Peculatus – Several Remarks on the Classification of the Offence of Embezzlement of Public Funds in Roman Law | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 11-25 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gnoli F., Ricerche sul crimen peculatus, Milano 1979. | |
dc.references | Gnoli F., Sulla repressione penale della ritenzione di ‘pecunia residua’ nella ‘lex Iulia peculatus’, "Rendiconti dell’Istituto lombardo, Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche" 107, 1973, p. 437–472. | |
dc.references | Gnoli F., Cic., Nat. deor. 3,74 e l’origine della „quaestio perpetua peculatus”, "Rendiconti dell’Istituto lombardo, Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche" 109, 1975, p. 331–341. | |
dc.references | Ziegler H.-D., Untersuchungen zur Strafrechtsgesetzgebung des Augustus, München 1964. | |
dc.references | Cicero, De officiis. | |
dc.references | Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita. | |
dc.references | Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae. | |
dc.references | Cicero, Pro Cluentio. | |
dc.references | Cicero, Pro Murena. | |
dc.references | Gnoli F., Sulla paternita e sulla datazione della ‘lex Iulia’, "Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris" 38, 1972, p. 328–338. | |
dc.references | Sondel J., Słownik łacińsko-polski dla prawników i historyków, Kraków 1997. | |
dc.references | d’Orgeval B., L’empereur Hadrien. Oeuvre legislative et administrative, Paris 1950. | |
dc.references | Birley A.R., Hadrian. The Restless Emperor, London 1997. | |
dc.references | Birley A.R., Hadrian. Cesarz niestrudzony, trans. R. Wiśniewski, Warszawa 2002. | |
dc.references | Dębiński A., Sacrilegium w prawie rzymskim, Lublin 1995. | |
dc.references | Gnoli F., ‘Rem privatam de sacrosurripere’ (contributo allo studio della repressione del ‘sacrilegium’ in diritto romano), "Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris" 40, 1974, p.151–204 | |
dc.references | Bauman R., Tertullian and the Crime of Sacrilegium, "Journal of Religious History" 4, 1967, p. 175–183. | |
dc.references | Corpus Iuris Civilis, ed. T. Mommsen, vol. I, Berolini 1906. | |
dc.references | Corpus Iuris Civilis, ed. T. Mommsen, vol. II, Berolini 1954. | |