Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Multi-level regional development governance: A European typology

dc.contributor.authorCotella, Giancarlo
dc.contributor.authorJanin Rivolin, Umberto
dc.contributor.authorPede, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPioletti, Maurizio
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T12:29:25Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T12:29:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/39585
dc.description.abstractThe European Union identifies the regional level as the ideal spatial scale for resources’ redistribution, in so doing turning European regions into key spatial development players. This raises challenges due to the heterogeneity of the EU in terms of administrative configurations, and spatial governance and planning systems. The contribution of this article draws on the results of three interlinked ESPON research projects to shed light on the matter. Building on an overview of the institutional variables that may influence successful regional development, it proposes a typology of multi-level regional development governance in the EU and reflects upon the potentials for delivering economic, social, and territorial cohesion.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectEU cohesion policyen
dc.subjectmulti-level governanceen
dc.subjectterritorial governanceen
dc.subjectspatial planning systemsen
dc.subjectregional developmenten
dc.titleMulti-level regional development governance: A European typologyen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number201-221
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCotella, Giancarlo - Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJanin Rivolin, Umberto - Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPede, Elena - Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPioletti, Maurizio - Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italyen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. (2014), ‘The engagement of territorial knowledge communities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: a Baltic Perspective’, European Planning Studies, 4 (22), pp. 712–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772735en
dc.referencesADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. J. (eds.) (2011), ‘Territorial knowledge channels in a multi-jurisdictional policy environment. A theoretical framework’, [in:] ADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. J. (eds.) (2011) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge, pp. 26–55. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973en
dc.referencesARESTIS, P. and PELAGIDIS, T. (2010), ‘Absurd Austerity Policies in Europe’, Challenge, 53 (6), pp. 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132530603en
dc.referencesARMONDI, S. and De GREGORIO HURTADO, S. (eds.) (2020), Foregrounding Urban Agendas. The New Urban Issue in European Experiences of Policy-Making, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29073-3en
dc.referencesBARON, M., GRASLAND, C., CUNNINGHAM-SABOT, E., RIVIÈRE, D. and VAN HAMME, G. (eds.) (2010), Villes et régions européennes en décroissance, Maintenir la cohésion territoriale, Paris: Lavoisier/ Hermès.en
dc.referencesBERISHA, E., COTELLA, G., JANIN RIVOLIN, U. and SOLLY, A. (2021), ‘Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: a European typology’, European planning studies, 29 (1), pp. 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295en
dc.referencesCAMAGNI, R. and CAPELLO, R. (2014), Rationale and Design of EU Cohesion Policies in a Period of Crisis with special reference to CEECs, GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Policy Paper, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12047en
dc.referencesCEC – Commission of the European Communities (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Regional Development Studies, Luxembourg: European Communities. http://www.espace-project.org/publications/EUcompendium.pdfen
dc.referencesCEC – Commission of the European Communities (2017), My region, my Europe, our future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion7/7cr.pdfen
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. (2007), ‘Central Eastern Europe in the global market scenario: Evolution of the system of governance in Poland from socialism to capitalism’, Journal fur Entwicklungspolitik, 23 (1), pp. 98–124. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-23-1-98en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. (2014), ‘Spatial Planning in Poland between European Influences and Dominant Market Forces’, [in:] REIMER, M., GETIMIS, P. and BLOTEVOGEL, H. (eds.) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Change, London: Routledge, pp. 255–277.en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. (2019), ‘The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy’, [in:] MEDEIROS, E. (ed.), Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Dimension, Springer, pp. 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G., ADAMS, N. and NUNES, R., (2012), ‘Engaging in European Spatial Planning: A Central and Eastern European Perspective on the Territorial Cohesion Debate’, European Planning Studies, 7 (20), pp. 1197–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673567en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G. and JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2015), ‘Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analítico’, Territorio, 73, pp. 127–134. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019en
dc.referencesCOTELLA, G., OTHENGRAFEN, F., PAPAIOANNOU, A. and TULUMELLO, S. (2015a), ‘Socio-spatial and socio-political implications of the economic crisis and austerity politics in Southern-European cities’, [in:] KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (eds.) Cities in Crisis. Socio-spatial Impacts of the Economic Crisis in Southern European Cities, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 27–47.en
dc.referencesDĄBROWSKI, M. (2014), ‘Towards place-based regional and local development strategie in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level’, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29 (4–5), pp. 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214535715en
dc.referencesDAVIES, H. W. E., EDWARDS, D., HOOPER, A. J., and PUNTER, J. V. (1989), ‘Comparative study’, [in:] DAVIES, H. W. E. (ed.), Planning control in Western Europe, London: HMSO, pp. 409–442.en
dc.referencesDAVIES, S. (2017), Does Cohesion policy work? Meta-review of research on the effectiveness of cohesion policy, European Policy Research Paper, 99. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2a-hUKEwiIyoPumffdAhXQy6QKHYPYDvAQFjAAegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eprc-strath.eu%2Fpublic%2Fdam%2Fjcr%3A2059df3a-8ca9-47da-b0e0-786f31b52160%2FEPRP%252099.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RDRjO9ONrq-WVbuqThwQLen
dc.referencesDE MELLO, L. and BARENSTEIN, M. (2001), Fiscal Decentralisation and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis, IMF Working Paper 01/71, Fiscal Affairs Department. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451849240.001en
dc.referencesD’OTTAVIO, G., CONWAY, M., PATEL, K. K., KOTT, S., METZLER, G., FICKERS, A. and SIERP, A. (2020), ‘New Narratives of European Integration History’, Contemporanea, 23 (1), pp. 99–132.en
dc.referencesDOTTI, N. F. (ed.) (2016), Learning from implementation and evaluation of the EU Cohesion Policy: Lessons from a research-policy dialogue, Brussels: RSA Research Network on Cohesion Policy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308903187_Learning_from_implementation_and_evaluation_of_the_EU_Cohesion_Policy_Lessons_from_a_research-policy_dialogueen
dc.referencesDÜHR, S., COLOMB, C. and NADIN, V. (2010), European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290en
dc.referencesESPON (2007), ESPON 2.3.2 Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report, Luxembourg: ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdfen
dc.referencesESPON (2013), ESPON TANGO. Territorial approaches for new governance. Final Report – Scientific Report, Luxembourg: ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON_TANGO_Scientific_Report_Final.pdfen
dc.referencesESPON (2017), ESPON ReSSI. Regional Strategies for sustainable and inclusive territorial development. Regional interplay and EU dialogue. Annex 2 – Governance regimes, opportunities and challenges for Europea regions and cities, Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ReSSI_Delivery%204_Annex%202_Governance%20Opportunities%20Challenges_FINAL.pdfen
dc.referencesESPON (2018), ESPON COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Applied Research 2016–2018. Final Report. Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/planning-systemsen
dc.referencesESPON (2021), ESPON METRO – The role and future perspectives of Cohesion Policy in the planning of Metropolitan Areas and Cities, Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/metroen
dc.referencesFALUDI, A. (2001). European Spatial Planning: A Contested Field. Built Environment (1978–), 27 (4), pp. 244–252, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23288462 [accessed on: 15.02.2021]en
dc.referencesFALUDI, A. (2008), ‘The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror’, Environment and Planning A, 40 (6), pp. 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39225en
dc.referencesFALUDI, A. (2010), Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age?, London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842324en
dc.referencesFERLAINO, F. and MOLINARI, P. (2009), Neofederalismo, neoregionalismo e intercomunalità, geografia amministrativa dell’Italia e dell’Europa, Bologna: Il Mulino.en
dc.referencesFRATESI, U. and WISHLADE, F. G. (2017), ‘The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts’, Regional Studies, 51 (6), pp. 817–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673en
dc.referencesGAGLIARDI, L. and PERCOCO, M. (2017), ‘The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions’, Regional Studies, 51 (6), pp. 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384en
dc.referencesGOLDSMITH, M. (1992), ‘Local Government’, Urban Studies, 29 (3–4), pp. 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080501en
dc.referencesHESSE, J. J. and SHARPE, L. J. (1991), ‘Conclusions’, [in:] HESSE, J. J. (ed.), Local government and urban affairs in international perspective: analyses of twenty Western industrialised countries, Schriften zur kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis, Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.en
dc.referencesHIX, S. (2005), The political system of the European Union, London: Palgrave MacMillan.en
dc.referencesHOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2001), Multi-level governance and European integration, Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.en
dc.referencesHOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2003), ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2), pp. 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649en
dc.referencesJANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2008), ‘Conforming and Performing Planning Systems in Europe: An Unbearable Cohabitation’, Planning Practice and Research, 23 (2), pp. 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081en
dc.referencesJANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2010), ‘EU territorial governance: learning from institutional progress’, European Journal of Spatial Development, (38), pp. 1–28, http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/refer-eed%2038.pdfen
dc.referencesJANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2012), ‘Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison’, Planning Practice and Research, 27 (1), pp. 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181en
dc.referencesJANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2017), ‘Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: a European comparison’, European Planning Studies 25 (6), pp. 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110en
dc.referencesKRAAY, A., KAUFMANN, D. and MASTRUZZI, M. (2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues, Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-5430 https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430en
dc.referencesMATSAGANIS, M. and LEVENTI, C. (2014), ‘The Distributional Impact of Austerity and the Recession in Southern Europe’, South European Society and Politics, 19 (3), pp. 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.94770en
dc.referencesMUÑOZ GIELEN, D. and TASAN-KOK, T. (2010), ‘Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands’, European Planning Studies, 18 (7), pp. 1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191en
dc.referencesNADIN, V. and STEAD, D. (2008), ‘European spatial planning systems, social models and learning’, disP, 172 (1), pp. 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001en
dc.referencesNEWMAN, P. and THORNLEY, A. (1996), Urban planning in Europe: international competition, national systems, and planning projects, London–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesNUGENT, N. (2006), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke and Durham NC: Palgrave and Duke University Press.en
dc.referencesRODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and GILL, N. (2003), ‘The global trend towards devolution and its implications’, Environment and Planning C, 21 (3), pp. 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0235en
dc.referencesSCHAKEL, A. H., HOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2015), ‘Multilevel governance and the state’, [in:] LEIBFRIED, S., HUBER, E., LANGE, M., LEVY, J. D., NULLMEIER, F. and STEPHENS, J. D. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state, Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 269–285.en
dc.referencesSCHARPF, F. W. (1994), ‘Community and autonomy: multi-level policy making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1 (2), pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406956en
dc.referencesSCHMITT, P. and VAN WELL, L. (2017), ‘Tracing the place-based coordinative frameworks of EU Territorial Cohesion Policy. From European spatial planning towards European territorial governance’, [in:] MEDEIROS, E. (ed.), Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743-7en
dc.referencesSTEAD, D. and COTELLA, G. (2011), ‘Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors. Some conclusions’, disP, 186 (3), pp. 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146en
dc.referencesSUTCLIFFE, J. B. (2000), ‘The 1999 reform of the structural fund regulations: multi-level governance or renationalization?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7 (2), pp. 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343205en
dc.referencesTULUMELLO, S., COTELLA, G. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2020), ‘Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies’, International Planning Studies, 25 (1), pp. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1701422en
dc.contributor.authorEmailCotella, Giancarlo - giancarlo.cotella@polito.it
dc.contributor.authorEmailJanin Rivolin, Umberto - umberto.janinrivolin@polito.it
dc.contributor.authorEmailPede, Elena - elena.pede@polito.it
dc.contributor.authorEmailPioletti, Maurizio - maurizio.pioletti@polito.it
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.28.1.11
dc.relation.volume28


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
6295-Article_Text-28009-1-10-2 ...
Rozmiar:
1.395MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0