Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorDall’Aglio, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T10:00:23Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T10:00:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38858
dc.description.abstractIn the correspondence between Innocent III and Kalojan of Bulgaria (1197–1207), the title of the Bulgarian ruler is recorded both as rex and imperator. While the pope consistently employs the title rex, Kalojan refers to himself, in every occasion, with the title imperator. Some scholars have speculated that the use of this title was a deliberate political move: styling himself imperator, Kalojan was claiming a much greater political dignity than that of king of Bulgaria, putting himself on the same level as the emperor of Constantinople. On the other hand, while Innocent’s letters were obviously written in Latin, Kalojan’s letters were originally in Bulgarian, translated in Greek, and finally translated from Greek to Latin. Therefore, the use of the word imperator may be just an attempt at translating the term βασιλεύς, not in the sense of Emperor of the Romans but merely in that of autocrat, a ruler whose power was fully independent from any other external political authority. This recognition was of a fundamental importance for Kalojan, since the rulers of Bulgaria’s neighbouring states, the kingdom of Hungary, the Byzantine empire, and especially the Latin empire of Constantinople, were not willing to recognize his legitimacy as an independent sovereign.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europeen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectpower conceptualization and legitimizationen
dc.subjectcrusade studiesen
dc.subjectSecond Bulgarian Stateen
dc.subjectLatin Empire of Constantinopleen
dc.subjectrelations between Bulgaria and Byzantiumen
dc.subjectInnocent IIIen
dc.subjectChurch history of the Romansen
dc.titleRex or Imperator? Kalojan’s Royal Title in the Correspondence with Innocent IIIen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number171-185
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Historical Studiesen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesActa Innocentii PP. III (1198–1216), ed. T. Haluščynskyj, Vatican City 1944 [= Pontificia commissio ad redigendum codicem iuris canonici orientalis. Fontes, 3.2].en
dc.referencesThe Deeds of Innocent III by an Anonymous Author, trans. J.M. Powell, Washington 2004.en
dc.referencesDujčev I., Prepiskata na papa Inokentij III s bălgarite. Uvod, tekst i komentar, “Годишник на Софий- ския Университет. Историко-Филологически факултет” / “Godišnik na Sofijskija Universitet. Istoriko-Filologičeski fakultet” 38, 3, 1942, p. 71–116.en
dc.referencesGeoffroi de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, vol. I–II, ed. E. Faral, 2Paris 1961.en
dc.referencesGesta Innocentii PP. III, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. CCIV, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1855, col. 147–148.en
dc.referencesHistoria de expeditione Friderici imperatoris, [in:] Quellen zur Geschichte des Kreuzzuges Kaiser Friedrichs I, ed. A. Chroust, Berlin 1928 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores rerum Germanicarum in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae historicis separatim editi, N.S., 5].en
dc.referencesHistoria Peregrinorum, [in:] Quellen zur Geschichte des Kreuzzuges Kaiser Friedrichs I, ed. A. Chroust, Berlin 1928 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Scriptores rerum Germanicarum in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae historicis separatim editi, N.S., 5].en
dc.referencesNicephori Chrysobergae ad Angelos orationes tres, ed. M. Treu, Breslau 1892.en
dc.referencesNicetae Choniatae Historia, ed. J.-L. van Dieten, Berlin–New York 1975 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae. Series Berolinensis, 11].en
dc.referencesNicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae, ed. J.-L. van Dieten, Berlin–New York 1972 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae. Series Berolinensis, 3].en
dc.referencesDie Register Innocenz’ III, vol. I–XIV, ed. O. Hageneder et al., Vienna–Graz–Koln 1964–2018.en
dc.referencesRobert de Clari, La conquete de Constantinople, ed. J. Dufournet, Paris 2004.en
dc.referencesVetera monumenta slavorum meridionalium historiam illustrantia, vol. I, ed. A. Theiner, Rome 1836.en
dc.referencesAtanasov G., Instituciite na srednovekovnite bălgarski vladeteli, Pleven 1999.en
dc.referencesBakalov G., Srednovekovnijat bălgarski vladetel, Sofija 1995.en
dc.referencesBălgarskijat zlaten vek. Sbornik v čest na car Simeon Veliki (893–927), ed. V. Gjuzelev, I. Iliev, K. Nenov, Plovdiv 2015.en
dc.referencesBiliarsky I., La translation des reliques a la capitale du second empire bulgare et les idees du pouvoir, [in:] Liturgia e agiografia tra Roma e Costantinopoli. Atti del I e II seminario di studio, Roma– Grottaferrata 2000–2001, ed. K. Stantchev, S. Parenti, Grottaferrata 2007, p. 329–338.en
dc.referencesBožilov I., Bălgarija pri Asenevci, “Исторически преглед” / “Istoričeski pregled” 36, 2, 1980, p. 80–95.en
dc.referencesBožilov I., Car Simeon Veliki (893–927). Zlatnijat vek na srednovekovna Bălgarija, Sofija 1983.en
dc.referencesBožilov I., Familijata na Asenevci (1186–1460). Genealogija i prosopografija, Sofija 1994.en
dc.referencesBožilov I., Gjuzelev V., Istorija na Srednovekovna Bălgarija, VII–XIV vek, vol. I, Sofija 1999.en
dc.referencesBrand C., Byzantium confronts the West, 1180–1204, Cambridge Mass. 1968.en
dc.referencesThe Bulgarian State in 927–969. The Epoch of Tsar Peter I, ed. M.J. Leszka, K. Marinow, Łodź–Krakow 2018 [= Byzantina Lodziensia, 34].en
dc.referencesCalasso F., I glossatori e la teoria della sovranita. Studio di diritto comune pubblico, 3Milan 1957.en
dc.referencesDall’Aglio F., ‘As it Had Been in the Past’: the Idea of National Continuity in the Establishment of the Second Bulgarian Kingdom, [in:] Laudator Temporis Acti. Studia in Memoriam Ioannis A. Božilov, vol. I, ed. I. Biliarsky, Sofia 2018, p. 282–299.en
dc.referencesDall’Aglio F., ‘In ipsa silva longissima Bulgariae’: Western Chroniclers of the Crusades and the Bulgarian Forest, “Bulgaria Mediaevalis” 1, 2010, p. 403–416.en
dc.referencesDall’Aglio F., Innocenzo III e i Balcani. Fede e politica nei ‘Regesta’ pontifici, Napoli 2003.en
dc.referencesDančeva-Vasileva A., Bălgarija i Latinskata imperija (1204–1261), Sofija 1985.en
dc.referencesDobičina A., A “Divine Sanction” on the Revolt: the Cult of St. Demetrius of Thessalonica and the Uprising of Peter and Asen, “Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Center for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-Eastern Europe” 2, 2012, p. 111–124.en
dc.referencesGagova K., Kalojan – Car na Bălgarija i Vlahija, “Исторически преглед” / “Istoričeski pregled” 55, 3/4, 1999, p. 3–17.en
dc.referencesGjuzelev V., Četvărtijat krăstonosen pohod, prevzemaneto na Carigrad i bălgaro-latinskite otnošenija 1204–1207 g., “Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика ” 28, 2004, p. 80–88.en
dc.referencesIordanov I., Korpus na pečatite na srednovekovna Bălgarija, Sofija 2001.en
dc.referencesKajmakamova M., Vlast i istorija v srednovekovna Bălgarija, VII–XIV vek, Sofija 2011.en
dc.referencesKolarov C., Andreev Y., Certaines questions ayant trait aux manifestations de continuite d’idees en Bulgarie medievale au des XII–XIV siecles, “Estudios Humanisticos” 9, 1979, p. 77–97.en
dc.referencesLeszka M.J., Marinow K., Carstwo Bułgarskie. Polityka, społeczeństwo, gospodarka, kultura 866–971, Warszawa 2015.en
dc.referencesMadgearu A., The Asanids. The Political and Military History of the Second Bulgarian Empire (1185–1280), Leiden 2017.en
dc.referencesMarinov K., Tărnovo kato svešten grad prez kăsnoto srednovekovie, [in:] Tărnovskata dăržava na Duha. Deseti jubileen meždunaroden simpozium, Veliko Tărnovo, 17–19 oktomvri 2013 g., V. Tărnovo 2015, p. 698–722.en
dc.referencesMladjov I., The Crown and the Veil: Titles, Spiritual Kinship, and Diplomacy in Tenth-Century Bulgaro- Byzantine Relations, “History Compass” 13, 2015, p. 171–183.en
dc.referencesNenov K., Bălgarskoto carstvo v latinskite izvori za krăstonosnija pohod na Fridrih Barbarosa (1189–1190), “Bulgaria Mediaevalis” 8, 2017, p. 135–169.en
dc.referencesNicol D., The Despotate of Epiros, Oxford 1959.en
dc.referencesOdrinskata bitka ot 1205 g., ed. V. Gjuzelev, Sofija 2005.en
dc.referencesPolyvianny D., The Cults of Saints in the Political Ideology of the Bulgarian Empire, [in:] Fonctions sociales et politiques du culte des saints dans les societes de rite grec et latin au Moyen Age et a l’epoque moderne, ed. M. Derwich, M. Dmitriev, Wrocław 1999, p. 401–417.en
dc.referencesStephenson P., Byzantium’s Balkan Frontier. A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204, Cambridge 2000.en
dc.referencesTricht F. van, The Latin Renovatio of Byzantium The Empire of Constantinople (1204–1228), Leiden 2011.en
dc.referencesUspenskij F., Obrazovanie vtorogo Bolgarskogo carstva, Odessa 1879.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailfra.dallaglio@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.09.10
dc.relation.volume9


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0