Pokaż uproszczony rekord

How Innovation Districts (Do Not) Work: the Case Study of Cracow

dc.contributor.authorGądecki, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorAfeltowicz, Łukasz
dc.contributor.authorAnielska, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorMorawska, Ilona
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-09T14:44:05Z
dc.date.available2021-08-09T14:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38508
dc.description.abstractThis article is an attempt to answer the question: how one selects a neighbourhood to develop an innovation district, using the case of Cracow. This article mainly refers to the issue of the shape of innovation districts, showing how much the morphology of such spaces and their functions can promote or limit the development of innovative enterprises from the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) industry. It also refers to our research carried out with quantitative and qualitative methods in Poland, using two locations in Cracow as a case study. In this paper, we focus on the significant restrictions which hinder the emergence and development of such districts. We also indicate the potential solutions to these difficulties such as the temporary spaces of events we mapped and which we called ‘totemic spaces’.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectinnovation districten
dc.subjectICTen
dc.subjectclusteren
dc.titleHow Innovation Districts (Do Not) Work: the Case Study of Cracowen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number149-171
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGądecki, Jacek - Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Cieszyńska 2, 30-015 Kraków, Poland; AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Humanities Gramatyka 8a, 30-071 Kraków, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAfeltowicz, Łukasz - AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Gramatyka 8a, 30-071 Kraków, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAnielska, Karolina - Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMorawska, Ilona - Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Cieszyńska 2, 30-015 Kraków, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesASHEIM, B., BUGGE, M.M., COENEN, L. and HERSTAD, S. (2013), ‘What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems’, Papers in Innovation Studies, 5.en
dc.referencesAUDRETSCH, D.B. and FELDMAN, M.P. (2004), ‘Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation’, Handbook of regional and urban economics, Elsevier, 4, pp. 2713–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-Xen
dc.referencesBAPTISTA, R. (2000), ‘Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters?’ International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp. 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00045-4en
dc.referencesBECATTINI, G. (1990), ‘The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Concept’, [in:] PYKE, F., BECATTINI, G. and SENGENBERGER, W. (eds.), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva, IILS.en
dc.referencesBOSCHMA, R. (2005), ‘Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment’, Regional Studies, 39 (1), pp. 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887en
dc.referencesBRESCHI, S. and LISSONI, F. (2001), ‘Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4), pp. 975–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.975en
dc.referencesBUZARD, K., CARLINO, G.A., HUNT, R.M., CARR, J. and SMITH, T.E. (2015), Localized Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from the Agglomeration of American R&D Labs and Patent Data, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Research Department. https://doi.org/10.21799/frbp.wp.2015.03en
dc.referencesCARLINO, G. and KERR, W.R. (2015), ‘Agglomeration and Innovation’, Chapter 6, [in:] DURANTON G., HENDERSON J.V. and STRANGE, W.C. (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 5, Elsevier, pp. 349–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00006-4en
dc.referencesCRESCENZI, R., NATHAN, M. and RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2016), ‘Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation’, Research Policy, 45 (1), pp. 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.003en
dc.referencesCUSMANO, L., MORRISON, A. and PANDOLFO, E. (2014), ‘Spin-off and clustering: a return to the Marshallian district’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39 (1), pp. 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu032en
dc.referencesDELGADO, M., PORTER, M.E. and STERN, S. (2014), ‘Clusters, convergence, and economic performance’, Research Policy, 43 (10), pp. 1785–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007en
dc.referencesDEPRET, M.H. and HAMDOUCH, A. (2013), ‘Clusters, Networks, and Entrepreneurship’, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_199en
dc.referencesERIKSSON, R.H. (2011), ‘Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plants?’, Economic Geography, 87 (2), pp. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01112.xen
dc.referencesFLORIDA, R. (2010), Narodziny klasy kreatywnej: oraz jej wpływ na przeobrażenia w charakterze pracy, wypoczynku, społeczeństwa i życia codziennego, Warsaw, Narodowe Centrum Kultury.en
dc.referencesGLAESER, E.L. (2014), https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/07/renewing-urban-renewal/ (accessed on 27.10.2019).en
dc.referencesGLAESER, E.L., KALLAL, H.D., SCHEINKMAN, J.A. and SHLEIFER, A. (1992), ‘Growth in cities’, Journal of Political Economy, 100 (6), pp. 1126–1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856en
dc.referencesGLAESER, E.L., RESSEGER, M. and TOBIO, K. (2009), ‘Inequality in Cities’, Journal of Regional Science, 49 (4), pp. 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00627.xen
dc.referencesGRAHAM, S. and GUY, S. (2002), ‘Digital space meets urban space. Sociotechnologies of urban restructuring in downtown San Francisco’, City, 6 (3), pp. 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481022000037788en
dc.referencesHEALY, A. and MORGAN, K. (2012), ‘Spaces of innovation: Learning, proximity and the ecological turn’, Regional Studies, 46 (8), pp. 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.672725en
dc.referencesHOWELLS, J.R. (2002), ‘Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography’, Urban Studies, 39 (5–6), pp. 871–884.en
dc.referencesJACOBS, J. (2016), The economy of cities, Vintage.en
dc.referencesJAFFE, A.B., TRAJTENBERG, M. and HENDERSON, R. (1993), ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), pp. 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401en
dc.referencesKATZ, B. and WAGNER, J. (2014), The rise of innovation districts: A new geography of innovation in America, Washington: Brookings Institution.en
dc.referencesKLEPPER, S. (2010), ‘The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit’, Journal of Urban Economics, 67 (1), pp. 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.004en
dc.referencesKO, A.J. (2017), ‘A Three-Year Participant Observation of Software Startup Software Evolution’, IEEE, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.29en
dc.referencesLÖW, M. (2016), The Sociology of Space – Materiality, Social Structures, and Action, New York, Cultural Sociology, Palgrave, Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-69568-3en
dc.referencesMAFFESOLI, M. (1995), The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society, Sage.en
dc.referencesMAILLAT, D. (1995), ‘Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7 (2), pp. 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629500000010en
dc.referencesMARKUSEN, A. (1996), ‘Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts’, Economic Geography, 72 (3), pp. 293–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402en
dc.referencesMARSHALL, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, 8th Edition, London, Macmillan.en
dc.referencesMARTIN, R. and SUNLEY, P. (2003), ‘Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?’, Journal of Economic Geography, 3, pp. 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5en
dc.referencesMAUSS, M. (2002), The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, Routledge.en
dc.referencesMICEK, G. (2017), Bliskość geograficzna przedsiębiorstw zaawansowanego przemysłu i usług a przepływy wiedzy, Krakow, Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie.en
dc.referencesMIRABAL, N.R. (2009), ‘Geographies of Displacement: Latina/os, oral history, and the politics of gentrification in San Francisco’s Mission District’, The Public Historian, 31 (2), pp. 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2009.31.2.7en
dc.referencesMORETTI, E. (2012), The new geography of jobs, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.en
dc.referencesMORGAN, K. (2004), ‘The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems’, Journal of Economic Geography, 4 (1), pp. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/4.1.3en
dc.referencesMORRISON, A. and BEVILACQUA, C. (2019), ‘Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district’, Urban Research & Practice, 12 (4), pp. 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1472799en
dc.referencesOLIVEIRA, V. (2018), Teaching Urban Morphology, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76126-8en
dc.referencesPORTER, M.E. (2000), ‘Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1), pp. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105en
dc.referencesRODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. and CRESCENZI, R. (2008), ‘Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1 (3), pp. 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn011en
dc.referencesSAXENIAN, A. (1996), Regional advantage, Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrsqhen
dc.referencesSPENCER, G.M. (2015), ‘Knowledge Neighborhoods: Urban Form and Evolutionary Economic Geography’, Regional Studies, 49 (5), pp. 883–898.en
dc.referencesSTORPER, M. and VENABLES A.J. (2004), ‘Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy’, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, pp. 351–370.en
dc.referencesWIŚNIEWSKI, M. (2011), ‘Zabłocie – a model revitalization?’, Herito , 4, pp. 58–77.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailGądecki, Jacek - jgadecki@agh.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailAfeltowicz, Łukasz - alf@agh.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailAnielska, Karolina - karolina.anielska@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailMorawska, Ilona - ilona.j.morawska@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.07
dc.relation.volume27


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
5812-Article_Text-20833-1-10-2 ...
Rozmiar:
2.328MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0