Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMicek, Grzegorz
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Polanden
dc.references2019 Global Coworking Survey (2019), Coworking Forecast, Deskmag.en
dc.referencesAKHAVAN, M., MARIOTTI, I., ASTOLFI, L. and CANEVARI, A. (2019), ‘Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on the Social Streets in Italy’, Urban Science, 3 (2). doi: 10.3390/urbansci3010002en
dc.referencesBEDNÁŘ, P. and DANKO, L. (2020), ‘Coworking spaces as a driver of the post-Fordist city: A tool for building a creative ecosystem’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 105–125.en
dc.referencesBÜRKNER, H.-J. and LANGE, B. (2020), ‘New geographies of work: Re-scaling micro-worlds’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 53–74.en
dc.referencesCAPDEVILA, I. (2015), ‘Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (3), 1540004, pp. 1–25.en
dc.referencesDOUGHERTY, D. (2012), ‘The maker movement’, Innovations, 7 (3), pp. 11–14.en
dc.referencesGĄDECKI, J., AFELTOWICZ Ł., ANIELSKA, K. and MORAWSKA, I. (2020), ‘How innovation districts (do not) work: The case study of Cracow’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 149–171.en
dc.referencesHATCH, M. (2014), The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers, New York: McGraw‐Hill.en
dc.referencesKOJO, I. and NENONEN, S. (2017), ‘Evolution of co-working places: drivers and possibilities’, Intelligent Buildings International, 9 (3), pp. 164–175.en
dc.referencesMARIOTTI, I. and AKHAVAN, M. (2020), ‘Exploring proximities in coworking spaces: Evidence from Italy’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 37–52.en
dc.referencesMARIOTTI, I., PACCHI, C. and DI VITA, S. (2017), ‘Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 47–66.en
dc.referencesMICEK, G. (2020), ‘Studies of proximity in coworking spaces: The basic conceptual challenges’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 9–35.en
dc.referencesOLDENBURG, R. (1989), The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community, Cambridge, MA, Da Capo Press.en
dc.referencesPARLAK, M. and BAYCAN, T. (2020), ‘The rise of creative hubs in Istanbul’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 127–147.en
dc.referencesSALONE C., BONINI BARALDI, S. and PAZZOLA, G. (2017), ‘Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy)’, European Planning Studies, 25 (12), pp. 2117–2137.en
dc.referencesSCHMIDT, S. and BRINKS, V. (2017), ‘Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 26, pp. 291–299.en
dc.referencesSCHUTJENS, V. and KRUGER, M. (2020), ‘The role of proximity in resources exchanged by incubatees of BioPartner Center Leiden, the Netherlands’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 75–104.en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as