Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGu, Hongfei
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-18T15:22:39Z
dc.date.available2021-06-18T15:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1427-9657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/37707
dc.description.abstractWhile much discussion centres on China’s engagement with Central and Eastern European countries, few studies investigate the role of subnational actors in the relations between the two sides. This paper brings China’s cooperation with Central and Eastern European (CEECs) countries, centred around what is popularly known as the “16 + 1” mechanism. It aims to unravel the link between local governments and the “16 + 1” cooperation mechanism. Local governments’ external cooperation is a new attempt in China’s diplomatic layout. It argues that the exchanges between local governments are a useful supplement to the in-depth cooperation between the two sides, and the cooperation between the two sides has formed a relatively stable pattern. At present, it has entered the stage of an in-depth integration focusing on optimization and upgrading. The further development of local cooperation mainly depends on whether it can play a sufficient leading role in the economic development of China and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEastern Reviewpl
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectChina-CEE Relationsen
dc.subjectLocal Governmenten
dc.subjectChina-Poland Relationsen
dc.titleSubnational actors in the relations between China and Central and Eastern European countriesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number101-121
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationChinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, P.R.China, Institute of European Studiesen
dc.identifier.eissn2451-2567
dc.referencesBlatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M., Thiele, J. 2008. The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competencies and Strategies. West European Politics 31(3), pp. 464–490.en
dc.referencesCasarini, N. 2015. China’s Rebalancing towards Europe. The International Spectator 50(3), pp. 122–129.en
dc.referencesChen, S.Y. 2019. Status Quo and Problems of Sino-Polish Humanities Exchange under the Framework of “17+1 Cooperation”. 17+1 Think Tanks Network Research Report (6).en
dc.referencesChen, Z. 2001. Subnational Governments and Foreign Affairs. Beijing: China Changcheng Press.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2013. The Bucharest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2014. The Belgrade Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2015. The Suzhou Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016. The Riga Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2017. The Budapest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2018. The Sofia Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesChinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2019. The Dubrovnik Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.en
dc.referencesColl, F.R. 2010. Foreign Policy of Constituents Units in A Globalized World. In Foreign Policy of Constituent’s Units at the Beginning of 21st Century. Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics, pp. 11–13.en
dc.referencesCzerep, J. 2017. Influence of the Łódź-Chengdu Railway on the Perception of 16+1 in Poland, Working Paper (5). China-CEE Institute.en
dc.referencesFrąk, M. 2017. Drugi „sukces” Macierewicza. Chińczycy odchodzą z Łodzi. Gazeta Wyborcza, http://lodz.wyborcza.pl/lodz/1,35153,21204457,drugi-sukces-macierewicza-chinczycy-odchodza-z-lodzi.html (accessed 13.09.2019).en
dc.referencesGóralczyk, B. 2017. China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: Enter the Dragon. European View 16(1), pp. 153–162.en
dc.referencesGrajewski, P.Ż. 2017. Polish foreign policy 2015–2017. Poland.pl, https://poland.pl/politics/opinions/polish-foreign-policy-2015-2017/ (accessed 1.01.2018).en
dc.referencesGrewal, D.S. 2008. Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization. Yale: Yale University Press.en
dc.referencesHuang, P.. Liu, Z.K. 2018. The Cooperation Between China and Central & Eastern European Countries (16+1) 2012–2017. Social Sciences Academic Press (China).en
dc.referencesJakóbowski, J., Popławski, K., Kaczmarski, M. 2018. The Silk Railroad. The EU-China Rail Connections: Background, Actors, Interests. Warszawa: Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich.en
dc.referencesJanduła, M. 2016. Hatrans: Przetarliśmy szlak dla pociągów Chiny – Polska. Rynek Kolejowy, http://www.rynek-kolejowy.pl/wiadomosci/hatrans-przetarlismy-szlak-dla-pociagow-chiny--polska-79567.html (accessed 5.08.2019).en
dc.referencesKamiński, T. 2019. What are the Factors Behind the Successful EU-China Cooperation on the Subnational Level? Case Study of the Lodzkie Region in Poland. Asia Europe Journal 17(2), pp. 227–242.en
dc.referencesKamiński, T., Skorupska, A., Szczudlik, J. 2019. The Subnational Dimension of EU-China Relations, PISM Report, p. 32.en
dc.referencesKowalski, B. 2017. China’s Foreign Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” Format in the South-South Cooperation Perspective, Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, 7R65ZH.en
dc.referencesLiu, Z. 2017. Europe and the “Belt and Road Initiative”: Responses and Risks. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.en
dc.referencesMaoz, Z. 2010. Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of International Networks, 1816–2001 (Vol. 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesMierzejewski, D. 2017. Between Central and Local Interdependence: Dimensions of Poland’s Relations with China. In: China’s Relations with Central and Eastern Europe from ‘Old Comrades’ to New Partners. New York and Oxford: Routledge, pp. 154–169.en
dc.referencesNagel, C.J. 2010. Foreign policy: The Case of the German Länder. In: F. Requejo (ed.). Foreign Policy of Constituent Units at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Barcelona, Spain: Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics.en
dc.referencesPietrasiak, M., Bywalec, G., Kaminski, T., Mierzejewski, D., Słowikowski, M. 2018. Paradiplomacy in Asia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.en
dc.referencesShepard, W. 2016. How Those China-Europe ‘Silk Road’ Trains First Began. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2016/06/29/the-story-of-how-those-china-europe-silk-road-trains-first-began/#68f70ec81734 (accessed 25.06.2019).en
dc.referencesSong, W. ed. 2017. China’s Relations with Central and Eastern Europe: From “Old Comrades” to New Partners. New York and Oxford: Routledge.en
dc.referencesStatistical Bureau of Sichuan. Sichuan Provincial People’s Government Work Report 2018.en
dc.referencesSzczudlik, J. 2015. “One Belt, One Road”: Mapping China’s New Diplomatic Strategy. PISM Bulletin 67, pp. 1–2.en
dc.referencesTatham, M. 2016. With, Without, or Against the State? How European Regions Play the Brussels Game. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesTiezzi, S.T. 2016. China’s Xi Brings “Belt and Road” to Serbia, Poland. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/chinas-xi-brings-belt-and-road-to-serbia-poland (accessed 30.04.2019).en
dc.referencesVan der Pluijm, R., Melissen, J. 2007. City Diplomacy: The Expanding Role of Cities in International Politics. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.en
dc.referencesWang, J.S. 2012. “Marching Westwards”: The Rebalancing of China’s Geostrategy. International and Strategic Studies Report (Peking University) 73, pp. 1–4.en
dc.referencesWang, Y. 2016. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Holds Event Presenting Sichuan Province, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (China).en
dc.referencesWojciechowski, P. 2017. Nowy Jedwabny Szlak łączy Europę z Dalekim Wschodem.en
dc.referencesGazeta Wyborcza, http://trojmiasto.wyborcza.pl/trojmiasto/7,35612,21417281,nowy-jedwabny-szlak-laczy-europe-z-dalekim-wschodem.html (accessed 13.09.2019).en
dc.referencesWorld Bank, 2018. The World Bank Annual Report.en
dc.referencesYuan, H. 2018. China’s Strategic Narrative and Challenges: The Case of Poland. Stosunki Międzynarodowe 54(2), pp. 121–141.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailguhf@cass.org.cn
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1427-9657.08.10
dc.relation.volume8


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0